Literature DB >> 29397196

The effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the fatigue failure load of adhesively cemented feldspathic ceramic discs.

Andressa B Venturini1, Catina Prochnow2, Gabriel K R Pereira3, Arie Werner4, Cornelis J Kleverlaan5, Luiz Felipe Valandro6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the influence of hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching at different concentrations on the fatigue failure load of adhesively cemented feldspathic ceramic discs (Vita Mark II). Besides, their effect on the micromorphology of ceramic surface was investigated.
METHODS: Eighty ceramic discs (ϕ=10 mm; thickness=1.5 mm) were cemented to epoxy supporting discs (ϕ=10 mm; thickness=2.0mm) using different surface conditioning methods (n=20): nonetched control (CTRL), or etched for 60s with different HF concentrations: 1% (HF1), 5% (HF5), or 10% (HF10). All the ceramic discs received a silane application (Monobond Plus). The epoxy discs were etched with 10% HF for 60s and received a primer coating (Multilink Primer A+B). Adhesively cementation was performed (Multilink Automix), and the assemblies (ceramic discs/epoxy discs) were subjected to cyclic loads in water by a staircase approach (500,000 cycles; 20Hz; initial load=290N; step size=30N). Fatigue failure load data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests (α=.05).
RESULTS: Mean failure load of the HF5 group (255.0±23.0N) was significantly lower; HF1 group (301.7±71.0N) presented intermediate values, and the highest values were achieved in CTRL (351.7±13.4N) and HF10 (341.7±20.6N) groups. All the failures were radial cracks starting from the bonding surface. SIGNIFICANCE: In terms of fatigue failure load, etching with 1% and 5% HF had a deleterious effect on the fatigue behavior of an adhesively cemented feldspathic ceramic, while 10% HF had no negative influence.
Copyright © 2018 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid etching; Fatigue; Glass ceramics; Mechanical cycling; Surface treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29397196     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  4 in total

1.  Effect of different surface treatments and multimode adhesive application on the Weibull characteristics, wettability, surface topography and adhesion to CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic.

Authors:  Karina Barbosa Souza; Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura; Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva; Gabriela Monteiro de Araújo; Rafael de Almeida Spinelli Pinto; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite; Mutlu Özcan; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Shear Bond Strength of a Direct Resin Composite to CAD-CAM Composite Blocks: Relative Contribution of Micromechanical and Chemical Block Surface Treatment.

Authors:  Vincent Fouquet; François Lachard; Sarah Abdel-Gawad; Elisabeth Dursun; Jean-Pierre Attal; Philippe François
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks.

Authors:  Yuko Nagasawa; Yoshikazu Eda; Hirotaka Shigeta; Marco Ferrari; Hiroshi Nakajima; Yasushi Hibino
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Influence of substrate design for in vitro mechanical testing.

Authors:  Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; Renata-Marques de Melo; Marco-Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-02-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.