Literature DB >> 29397126

Universal videolaryngoscopy: a structured approach to conversion to videolaryngoscopy for all intubations in an anaesthetic and intensive care department.

T M Cook1, N J Boniface2, C Seller2, J Hughes2, C Damen2, L MacDonald2, F E Kelly2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used, but not yet routine practice, for tracheal intubation. Few departments formally trial equipment before adopting it into practice. We describe the decision-making and implementation processes that our department used when introducing universal VL, with the C-MAC© (Karl Storz, Germany), throughout our anaesthesia and intensive care departments.
METHODS: We used a structured process to assess the feasibility of a change to universal VL. After departmental training, we undertook a 2 month trial period of mandating VL for all adult in-theatre intubations. Thereafter, VL remained widely available, but not mandated. We regularly surveyed anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants to evaluate departmental opinion regarding the introduction of universal VL.
RESULTS: Before the trial period, one-third of anaesthetists judged that universal VL would be of overall benefit to patient safety, team dynamics, and quality of care. Reservations from both junior and senior anaesthetists focused on training concerns. Support for a changeover to VL, amongst both anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants, increased throughout the trial period. Six months after the 2 month trial, support had grown further and was almost unanimous. Anaesthetists reported significant benefits in clinical performance, teaching, and human factors, especially teamwork and situation awareness.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing a formal and prolonged trial of mandatory VL in theatre led to changes in perceptions and departmental consensus. As a result of the trial, the department agreed to the use of C-MAC© videolaryngoscopy as the default intubation technique throughout theatres and intensive care, with removal of standard Macintosh laryngoscopes from routine use.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway; complications; difficult; human factors; intubation; patient safety; videolaryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29397126     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chun; Mi Hwa Chung; Jung Eun Kim; Kyung Mi Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Jung Mo Son; Jiho Park; Joo Hyun Jun
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 2.  Airway Leads and Airway Response Teams: Improving Delivery of Safer Airway Management?

Authors:  Carolyn Smith; Alistair F McNarry
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 3.  Recent advances in laryngoscopy in adults.

Authors:  Matteo Parotto; Richard Cooper
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-06-06

4.  Airway management equipment and practice: time to optimise institutional, team, and personal preparedness.

Authors:  Matthew Gibbins; Fiona E Kelly; Tim M Cook
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Influence of videolaryngoscopy using McGrath Mac on the need for a helper to perform intubation during general anaesthesia: a multicentre randomised video-no-video trial.

Authors:  Olivier Belze; Zoé Coppere; Jonathan Ouattara; Laurie-Anne Thion; Xavier Paqueron; Jean-Michel Devys; Sabrina Ma; Titouan Kennel; Marc Fischler; Morgan Le Guen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

7.  Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID-19 era: A manikin based pilot study.

Authors:  Ashish Kannaujia; Rudrashish Haldar; Rafat Shamim; Prabhakar Mishra; Anil Agarwal
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-01

8.  A special issue on respiration and the airway: critical topics at a challenging time.

Authors:  Takashi Asai; Ellen P O'Sullivan; Hugh C Hemmings
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  The Anesthesiologist's Role in Teaching Airway Management to Nonanesthesiologists: Who, Where, and How.

Authors:  Thomas E Grissom; Ron E Samet
Journal:  Adv Anesth       Date:  2020-10-05

10.  Changing the view: impact of simulation-based mastery learning in pediatric tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Amélia G Reis; Sylvia C L Farhat; Vitor E L Carvalho; Claudio Schvartsman
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.990

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.