| Literature DB >> 29396692 |
Abstract
Maillard reactions products (MRPs) are a major colorant of distillery effluent. It is major source of environmental pollution due to its complex structure and recalcitrant nature. This study has revealed that sucrose glutamic acid-Maillard reaction products (SGA-MRPs) showed many absorption peaks between 200 and 450 nm. The absorption maximum peak was noted at 250 nm in spectrophotometric detection. This indicated the formation of variable molecular weight Maillard products during the SGA-MRPs formation at high temperature. The identified aerobic bacterial consortium consisting Klebsiella pneumoniae (KU726953), Salmonella enterica (KU726954), Enterobacter aerogenes (KU726955), Enterobacter cloaceae (KU726957) showed optimum production of MnP and laccase at 120 and 144 h of growth, respectively. The potential bacterial consortium showed decolourisation of Maillard product up to 70% in presence of glucose (1%), peptone (0.1%) at optimum pH (8.1), temperature (37 °C) and shaking speed (180 rpm) within 192 h of incubation. The reduction of colour of Maillard product correlated with shifting of absorption peaks in UV-Vis spectrophotometry analysis. Further, the changing of functional group in FT-IR data showed appearance of new peaks and GC-MS analysis of degraded sample revealed the depolymerisation of complex MRPs. The toxicity evaluation using seed of Phaseolus mungo L. showed reduction of toxicity of MRPs after bacterial treatment. Hence, this study concluded that developed bacterial consortium have capability for decolourisation of MRPs due to high content of MnP and laccase.Entities:
Keywords: GC–MS analysis; Laccase; Manganese peroxidase; Melanoidins; Metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29396692 PMCID: PMC5797191 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-018-2416-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0959-3993 Impact factor: 3.312
Physico-chemical analysis of sucrose-glutamic acid Maillard products
| Parameter | Untreated (control) | Bacterial treated | Reduction (%) | Discharge permissible limit (USEPA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 96 h | After 192 h | ||||
| Color appearance | Dark brown | Dark brown | Light brown | – | – |
| pH | 6.9 ± 0.0 | 4.1 ± 0.10b | 8.1 ± 0.20a | − 14.28 | – |
| BOD | 8641 ± 160.33 | 5472 ± 1.04a | 2568 ± 2.01a | 70.28 | 40.00 |
| COD | 11586 ± 92.82 | 4867 ± 1.29a | 4201 ± 3.11a | 63.74 | 120.00 |
| TDS | 1050.77 ± 2.39 | 997.1 ± 1.01b | 687.92 ± 2.90a | 34.53 | – |
| VS | 457.83 ± 9.39 | 254.24 ± 1.11a | 113.41 ± 1.12a | 75.22 | – |
| Phenolics | 110.56 ± 1.40 | 89.01 ± 0.01b | 55.77 ± 1.43a | 49.55 | 750.00 |
All values are mean (n = 3) ± SD in mg L−1 except pH
BOD biological oxygen demand, COD chemical oxygen demand, TDS total dissolved solid, VS volatile solids
Student’s t test (two tailed as compared with untreated sample) was performed, where
aHighly significant at p < 0.001
bSignificant at p < 0.01
Fig. 1Effect of different nutrient and environmental parameters on SGA-MRPs decolourisation. a Carbon source, b nitrogen source, c pH, and d temperature and shaking speed at 37 °C for 24–192 h incubation
Fig. 2a Growth pattern and b scanning electron micrograph of developed bacterial consortium during degradation and decolourisation of SGA-MRPs
Fig. 3Analysis of untreated and treated SGA-MRPs at different time interval by a UV–Vis spectrum, and b HPLC analysis (at 250 nm)
Fig. 4GC–MS chromatogram of organic compounds extracted with ethyl acetate from SGA-MRPs. a Control, b bacterial degraded after 96 h incubation, and c bacterial degraded after 192 h incubation
Organic compounds identified by GC–MS analysis extracted with ethyl acetate from untreated (control) and bacterial treated SGA-MRPs
| SI. No. | Name of compound | RT | C | BT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 h | 192 h | ||||
| 1 | Nonane, 3,7-dimethyl | 7.76 | + | − | − |
| 2 | Butane, 2,3-bis(trimethylsiloxy) | 7.82 | − | + | − |
| 3 | 1-Octanol,2,2-dimethyl | 7.85 | + | − | − |
| 4 | 3,6-Dioxa-2,7-disilaoctane,2,2,4,5,7,7-hexamethyl | 8.00 | − | + | − |
| 5 | Dodecane, 2,6, 10-trimethyl | 8.05 | + | − | − |
| 6 | 8.34 | + | − | − | |
| 7 | 1-Dodecene | 8.41 | + | − | − |
| 8 | Piperidine, 1,4-dimethyl | 8.68 | − | + | − |
| 9 | Undecane, 2-methyl | 8.80 | + | − | − |
| 10 | Butanoic acid, TMS ester | 9.12 | + | − | − |
| 11 | Dodecane | 9.28 | + | + | − |
| 12 | 3-Hydroxy-2-butanone. TMS ester | 9.41 | − | − | + |
| 13 | Ethanolamine, TBS | 9.65 | − | − | + |
| 14 | Silane, trimethyl(4-methylphenoxy) | 10.31 | − | + | − |
| 15 | Butane, 2,3-bis(TMSoxy) | 10.52 | − | − | + |
| 16 | α- | 10.53 | − | + | − |
| 17 | 2-Hexenoic acid, 5-(1-ethoxyethoxy), 2-(TMS)ethyl ester | 10.57 | − | + | − |
| 18 | Silanol, trimethyl, benzoate | 12.36 | + | − | − |
| 19 | Octanoic acid, TMS ester | 12.75 | − | + | − |
| 20 | Silanol, trimethyl-phosphate | 12.90 | + | − | − |
| 21 | Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl | 13.22 | + | − | − |
| 22 | Benzeneacetic acid, TMS ester | 13.44 | + | − | − |
| 23 | 1-Tetradecanol | 13.60 | + | − | − |
| 24 | Butanedioic acid, bis(TMS)ester | 13.82 | − | + | − |
| 25 | 2-Bromo dodecane | 13.93 | + | − | − |
| 26 | Pentadecane | 14.03 | + | − | + |
| 27 | Dodecane, 2,6,11-trimethyl | 14.07 | + | − | − |
| 28 | Vanillin, | 14.45 | − | + | − |
| 29 | Heptadecane | 14.47 | + | − | − |
| 30 | 4-Methoxy-α-(TMS)benzenemethanol | 14.51 | − | + | − |
| 31 | Nonanoic acid, TMS ester | 14.85 | − | + | − |
| 32 | 1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3-dimethyl-7-(TMS) | 15.34 | − | + | − |
| 33 | Tetradecane | 15.77 | + | − | − |
| 34 | Decanoic acid, TMS ester | 16.92 | − | + | − |
| 35 | Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl | 17.60 | + | − | − |
| 36 | 2-(2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy-trimethylsilane | 17.84 | + | − | − |
| 37 | Phenol,2,4-bis(1,1dimethylethyl) | 17.95 | + | − | − |
| 38 | 1-Tetradecanol | 18.17 | + | − | − |
| 39 | Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl | 18.30 | + | − | − |
| 40 | Undecenoic aicd, TMS ester | 18.51 | − | − | + |
| 41 | Undecenoic acid, TMS ester | 18.52 | − | + | − |
| 42 | Hexadecane | 19.82 | + | − | − |
| 43 | Dodecanoic acid, TMS ester | 20.77 | + | + | + |
| 44 | Pumiliotoxin | 20.52 | − | + | − |
| 45 | Docosane | 21.68 | + | + | + |
| 46 | Pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl-3-propyl | 21.56 | + | − | − |
| 47 | Glucopyranose-1,2,3,5-Di-methylboronate-TMS | 22.11 | − | + | − |
| 48 | 2,6-Diisopropylnaphthalene | 22.19 | + | − | − |
| 49 | 3,4-Tetramethylene-5,5-pentamethyle-2-nepyrazoline | 22.66 | + | − | − |
| 50 | 22.71 | − | + | + | |
| 51 | Leucine | 22.82 | + | − | − |
| 52 | Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 23.32 | − | + | − |
| 53 | Myristoleic acid ITMS | 23.87 | − | + | − |
| 54 | Tetradecanoic acid, TMS ester | 24.20 | − | + | − |
| 55 | Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 24.28 | − | − | + |
| 56 | Hexadecane, 2,6,11,15-tetramethyl | 25.34 | + | − | − |
| 57 | 7,9-Di- | 25.21 | + | − | − |
| 58 | n-Pentadecanoic acid, TMS ester | 25.43 | − | + | |
| 59 | 2-Hexadecanol acetate | 25.52 | − | − | + |
| 60 | 1,4-Diaza-2,5-dioxa-3-isobutyl bicycle nonane | 25.60 | − | + | − |
| 61 | 25.60 | − | − | + | |
| 62 | Heptacosane | 29.40 | + | − | − |
| 63 | Hexadecanoic acid, TMS ester | 27.55 | + | + | + |
| 64 | 1H-Purin-6-amine,[(2-fluorophenyl)]methyl | 27.90 | + | − | − |
| 65 | 27.14 | − | + | − | |
| 66 | 28.79 | − | + | + | |
| 67 | Pentacosane | 29.29 | + | − | − |
| 68 | Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 29.72 | − | + | + |
| 69 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, TMS ester | 29.93 | − | + | − |
| 70 | 2,2-Bis[(4-trimethylsiloxy)phenyl]propane | 30.00 | + | − | − |
| 71 | 11- | 30.10 | − | + | + |
| 72 | Octadecanoic acid, TMS ester | 30.38 | − | + | − |
| 73 | 31.46 | − | + | + | |
| 74 | Methyl 19-methyl-eicosanoate | 32.16 | − | + | + |
| 75 | Nonacosane | 32.30 | + | − | − |
| 76 | 2-Acetyl-3-(2-cinnamido)ethyl-7-methoxyindole | 32.38 | − | + | − |
| 77 | 17-Pentatriacontane | 33.41 | − | + | − |
| 78 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester | 33.51 | + | − | − |
| 79 | 1-Docosanol, acetate | 33.40 | − | − | + |
| 80 | Hexadecanoic acid | 33.67 | + | − | − |
| 81 | Dotriacontane | 33.90 | − | + | − |
| 82 | Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl) | 33.97 | + | − | − |
| 83 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(TMS)oxy]propyl ester | 33.98 | − | − | + |
| 84 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(TMS)oxy]propyl ester | 33.99 | − | + | − |
| 85 | Docosanoic acid, methyl ester | 34.08 | − | − | + |
| 86 | Ethyl docosanoate | 34.09 | − | + | − |
| 87 | 34.24 | − | + | − | |
| 88 | Docosanoic acid, TMS ester | 34.45 | − | + | − |
| 89 | Quercetin 7,3′,4′,-trimethoxy | 34.72 | − | + | − |
| 90 | Heptacosane | 34.99 | − | + | − |
| 91 | 17-Pentatriacontene | 35.13 | − | − | + |
| 92 | 2-Monostearin, TMS ether | 35.30 | − | + | + |
| 93 | Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(TMS)oxy]propyl ester | 35.58 | − | − | + |
| 94 | Ethyl tetacosanoate | 35.72 | − | − | + |
| 95 | 2,6,10,14,18,22-Tetracohexane, 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl | 35.91 | − | + | − |
| 96 | Silane, [[(3β)-cholest-5-en-3-yl]oxy]TM | 39.47 | − | + | − |
| 97 | Silane, (ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3β-yl)TM | 40.71 | − | + | − |
| 98 | Methylenebis (2,4,6-triisopropylphenylphosphine) | 43.94 | + | − | − |
TMS trimethylsilyl, C control, BT bacterial treated, RT retention time
Effect of untreated and bacterial treated SGA-MRPs on the seed germination and seedling growth of Phaseolus mungo L
| Samples | Treatment (%) | Germination (%) | Germination index | Phytotoxicity (%) | Seedling vigor index | Stress tolerance index (%) | Relative toxicity (%) | Radical length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 2.5 | 75 ± 0.00 | 0.61 ± 0.00 | 18.64 ± 0.09 | 180 ± 8.01 | 81.35 ± 0.02 | 25 ± 0.01 | 2.40 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | 70 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.00 | 30.50 ± 0.06 | 143.50 ± 4.21 | 69.49 ± 0.02 | 30 ± 0.03 | 2.05 ± 0.01 | |
| 10 | 60 ± 0.00 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 49.15 ± 0.07 | 90 ± 0.08 | 50.84 ± 0.01 | 40 ± 0.02 | 1.50 ± 0.00 | |
| 15 | 15 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 62.71 ± 0.04 | 16.5 ± 0.01 | 37.28 ± 0.01 | 85 ± 0.11 | 1.10 ± 0.00 | |
| 20 | NG | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Treated | 2.5 | 90 ± 0.00 | 0.85 ± 0.00 | 5.08 ± 0.01 | 252 ± 14.01 | 94.91 ± 0.03 | 10 ± 0.00 | 2.80 ± 0.01 |
| 5 | 90 ± 0.00 | 0.71 ± 0.00 | 20.33 ± 0.01 | 211.5 ± 9.14 | 79.66 ± 0.02 | 10 ± 0.00 | 2.35 ± 0.01 | |
| 10 | 80 ± 0.00 | 0.61 ± 0.00 | 23.05 ± 0.03 | 181.6 ± 4.21 | 76.94 ± 0.02 | 20 ± 0.01 | 2.27 ± 0.02 | |
| 15 | 25 ± 0.00 | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 27.11 ± 0.02 | 53.75 ± 0.04 | 72.88 ± 0.01 | 75 ± 0.09 | 2.15 ± 0.01 | |
| 20 | 20 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 49.15 ± 0.01 | 30 ± 0.00 | 50.84 ± 0.01 | 80 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.00 | |
| Control | 0 | 100 ± 0.00 | – | – | 295 ± 24.01 | – | – | 2.95 ± 0.01 |
All values are mean of three replicates ± SD
NG no germination, control tap water