| Literature DB >> 29396691 |
Paul Z Benitez-Aguirre1,2, Tien Y Wong3,4,5, Maria E Craig1,2,6, Elizabeth A Davis7,8, Andrew Cotterill9, Jennifer J Couper10,11, Fergus J Cameron12,13,14, Farid H Mahmud15, Tim W Jones7,8, Lauren A B Hodgson3, R Neil Dalton16, David B Dunger17, Kim C Donaghue18,19.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined the hypothesis that elevation in urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes is associated with abnormal retinal vascular geometry (RVG) phenotypes.Entities:
Keywords: AdDIT; Adolescents; Diabetic retinopathy; Microvascular complications; Nephropathy; Retinal vascular geometry; Type 1 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29396691 PMCID: PMC6447498 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4538-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetologia ISSN: 0012-186X Impact factor: 10.122
Fig. 1Retinal photograph taken at baseline, showing central optic disc field and macula field. Retinal zones according to SIVA: standard zone (A+B), extended zone (A + B + C)
Clinical characteristics and retinal vascular measures by ACR risk group
| Characteristic | Low-risk | High-risk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, | 276 (53) | 237 (53) | 0.9 |
| Age, years | 14.5 ± 1.6 | 14.2 ± 1.6 | 0.001 |
| Diabetes duration, years | 7.4 (4.9–10.2) | 5.4 (3.6–8.1) | <0.001 |
| Height, cm | 165.0 ± 10.4 | 163.6 ± 10.6 | 0.049 |
| Weight, kg | 61.8 ± 13.6 | 58.4 ± 13.4 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 21.9 (19.7–24.6) | 20.9 (18.8–23.5) | <0.001 |
| BMI SDS | 0.95 ± 1.00 | 0.72 ± 1.05 | 0.001 |
| Waist, cm | 76.0 ± 10.0 | 74.3 ± 9.2 | 0.01 |
| Waist:height | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.07 |
| SBP, mmHg | 115.6 ± 11.3 | 116.5 ± 12.0 | 0.3 |
| SBP SDS | −0.14 ± 1.05 | 0.03 ± 1.13 | 0.02 |
| DBP, mmHg | 65.3 ± 8.1 | 66.1 ± 8.1 | 0.2 |
| DBP SDS | 0.90 ± 0.92 | 1.01 ± 0.93 | 0.1 |
| Smoking, proportion (%) | 5/522 (1.0) | 3/399 (0.8) | 0.6 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 68 ± 14 | 69 ± 16 | 0.3 |
| HbA1c, % | 8.4 ± 1.3 | 8.5 ± 1.4 | 0.3 |
| Cholesterol, mmol/l | 4.40 ± 0.86 | 4.38 ± 0.84 | 0.7 |
| eGFR, ml min−1 1.73 m−2 | 122 ± 21 | 129 ± 24 | <0.001 |
| RVG | |||
| CRAE, μm | 154.2 ± 12.3 | 151.7 ± 12.3 | 0.002 |
| CRVE, μm | 217.8 ± 17.5 | 215.6 ± 17.7 | 0.045 |
| exMWa, μm | 77.6 ± 6.6 | 75.5 ± 6.6 | <0.001 |
| exMWv, μm | 88.8 ± 7.4 | 87.0 ± 7.9 | 0.001 |
| CTa ×106 | 96.1 ± 1.3 | 99.7 ± 1.4 | 0.035 |
| CTv ×106 | 89.8 ± 1.2 | 93.7 ± 1.3 | 0.006 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for parametric data, median (IQR) for non-parametric data and n (%) or proportion (%) for discrete data
Fig. 2Associations between RVG measures and ACR. (a, b) RVG measures by ACR risk groups. Retinal arteriolar calibre in the extended zone was narrower (a, p<0.001) and tortuosity of venules was greater (b, p=0.005) in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. (c, d) Continuous association between log10 ACR by RVG measure quintiles. Data for all panels are presented as mean and 95% CIs. p values represent ANOVA for whole-group analysis. p<0.001 in (c); p=0.02 in (d)
RVG measures are associated with urinary albumin excretion
| RVG measure | Linear regression: outcome log10 ACR | Logistic regression: outcome high-risk ACR group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable model | Multivariable modela | Univariate model | Multivariable modelb | |||||
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||||
| RVG calibrec | ||||||||
| CRAE (μm) | −0.002 (−0.003, −0.001) | 0.004 | −0.001 (−0.002, 0.0003) | 0.1 | 1.20 (0.89, 1.65) | 0.3 | 1.04 (0.73, 1.49) | 0.8 |
| CRVE (μm) | −0.001 (−0.001, 0.0003) | 0.2 | 0.0001 (−0.001, 0.001) | 0.8 | 1.27 (0.92, 1.74) | 0.1 | 0.99 (0.70, 1.41) | 0.95 |
| exMWa (μm) | −0.006 (−0.008, −0.003) | <0.001 | −0.004 (−0.006, −0.002) | 0.001 | 1.96 (1.42, 2.71) | <0.001 | 1.67 (1.17, 2.38) | 0.005 |
| exMWv (μm) | −0.003 (−0.004, −0.001) | 0.01 | −0.001 (−0.003, 0.0008) | 0.3 | 1.77 (1.29, 2.44) | <0.001 | 1.39 (0.98, 1.99) | 0.07 |
| RVG tortuosityd | ||||||||
| Loge CTa ×106 | 0.048 (−0.007, 0.103) | 0.09 | 0.079 (0.02, 0.13) | 0.005 | 1.78 (1.30, 2.46) | <0.001 | 2.05 (1.44, 2.92) | <0.001 |
| Loge CTv ×106 | 0.067 (0.004, 0.13) | 0.03 | 0.096 (0.03, 0.16) | 0.003 | 2.15 (1.56, 2.98) | <0.001 | 2.38 (1.67, 3.40) | <0.001 |
| Combined RVG models | ||||||||
| exMWaQ1 & CTvQ5 vs otherse | 0.12 (0.06, 0.17) | <0.001 | 0.11 (0.05, 0.17) | <0.001 | 3.42 (1.96, 5.97) | <0.001 | 3.32 (1.84, 5.96) | <0.001 |
| exMWaQ1 & exMWvQ1 vs othersf | 0.08 (0.03, 0.13) | 0.002 | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.10) | 0.09 | 2.24 (1.43, 3.50) | <0.001 | 1.77 (1.08, 2.90) | 0.02 |
Each row represents a separate model. Outcome variable for linear regression modelling was log10 ACR. HbA1c, sex, lipids and SBP SDS were not significant in univariable models. Outcome variable for logistic regression modelling was high-risk ACR group. HbA1c, sex and lipids were not significant in univariable models
aMultivariable models are adjusted for BMI SDS and duration
bMultivariable models are adjusted for BMI SDS, duration and SBP SDS
cLogistic regression outcome is shown for Q1 vs Q2–Q5
dLogistic regression outcome is shown for Q5 vs Q1–Q4
eLogistic regression outcome is shown for exMWaQ1 & CTvQ5 vs the others
fLogistic regression outcome is shown for exMWaQ1 & exMWvQ1 vs the others