| Literature DB >> 29396457 |
Shengzhao Zhang1,2, Gang Li1,2, Jiexi Wang3, Donggen Wang4, Ying Han4, Hui Cao4, Ling Lin5,6.
Abstract
Hemoglobin concentration is an indicator for assessing blood product quality. To measure hemoglobin concentration in blood products without damaging blood bags, we proposed a method based on visible-near infrared transmission spectroscopy. Complex optical properties of blood bag walls result in measurement irregularities. Analyses showed that the slope of the light intensity-pathlength curve was more robust to the influence of the blood bag wall. In this study, the transmission spectra of red blood cell suspensions at multiple optical pathlengths were obtained, and the slopes of logarithmic light intensity-pathlength curves were calculated through curve fitting. A nondestructive measurement of hemoglobin content was achieved by using a regression model correlating slope spectra and hemoglobin concentration. Sixty samples with hemoglobin concentrations ranging from 72 to 161 g/L were prepared. Among them, 40 samples were used as a calibration set, and the remaining 20 samples were used as a prediction set. The determination coefficient of the prediction set was 0.97, with a mean square error of 2.78 g/L. This result demonstrates that a non-destructive measurement of hemoglobin levels in blood bags can be achieved by multiple-pathlength transmission spectroscopy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29396457 PMCID: PMC5797075 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20547-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Blood bags used for blood collection and transfusion.
Figure 2(a) The spectrum of the light source and the transmission spectra of 8 empty blood bags manufactured by Weigaogroup Co. Ltd. (b) The spectrum of the light source and the transmission spectra of 8 empty blood bags manufactured by Nigale Biological Technology Co. Ltd.
Figure 3Schematic of light passing through a bag and the liquid sample inside.
Optical parameters in the Monte Carlo simulation.
| Package | Liquid Sample |
|---|---|
| μa1 = 0.005 cm−1 | μa2 = 0.35, 0.40, …, 1.55 cm−1 |
| μs1 = 75, 125, 175 cm−1 | μs2 = 100 cm−1 |
Figure 4Logarithm of the transmitted light intensity with different package parameters for μa2 ranging from 0.35–1.55 cm−1.
Figure 5The slope of the logarithm of light intensity vs. sample thickness with different package parameters for μa2 ranging from 0.35–1.55 cm−1.
Figure 6Schematic block Diagram of the hemoglobin detection device.
HB concentrations in 60 blood samples.
| No. | Hb (g/L) | No. | Hb (g/L) | No. | Hb (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 114 | 21 | 110 | 41 | 128 |
| 2 | 144 | 22 | 131 | 42 | 134 |
| 3 | 123 | 23 | 154 | 43 | 107 |
| 4 | 114 | 24 | 130 | 44 | 108 |
| 5 | 111 | 25 | 128 | 45 | 123 |
| 6 | 146 | 26 | 137 | 46 | 142 |
| 7 | 135 | 27 | 146 | 47 | 154 |
| 8 | 102 | 28 | 133 | 48 | 128 |
| 9 | 127 | 29 | 136 | 49 | 134 |
| 10 | 132 | 30 | 120 | 50 | 124 |
| 11 | 116 | 31 | 141 | 51 | 129 |
| 12 | 116 | 32 | 126 | 52 | 135 |
| 13 | 101 | 33 | 118 | 53 | 137 |
| 14 | 151 | 34 | 128 | 54 | 126 |
| 15 | 143 | 35 | 98 | 55 | 110 |
| 16 | 118 | 36 | 133 | 56 | 122 |
| 17 | 106 | 37 | 72 | 57 | 150 |
| 18 | 125 | 38 | 88 | 58 | 115 |
| 19 | 161 | 39 | 82 | 59 | 94 |
| 20 | 114 | 40 | 105 | 60 | 83 |
Information about the Samples in Calibration Set and Prediction.
| Data Set | Maximum value | Minimum value | Mean Value | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration Set | 72 g/L | 161 g/L | 123.15 g/L | 19.41 g/L |
| Prediction Set | 83 g/L | 154 g/L | 124.15 g/L | 17.56 g/L |
Dataset used for PLSR model.
| Independent Variable ( | Dependent Variable ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | S1 | Concentration of the Hb |
| Model 2 | A1 | Concentration of the Hb |
Figure 7Spectral Data and slope vector of sample 1 in wavelength range 620–1170 nm.
Figure 8(a) Calculated Hb concentration in Model 1 using dataset S1. (b) Calculated Hb concentration in Model 2 using dataset A1. (c) Calculated Hb concentration by applying dataset S2 to Model 1. (d) Calculated Hb concentration by applying dataset A2 to Model 2.
Performance indictor of the two models.
| Dataset | Rc | Rp | RMSEC | RMSEP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | S1 | 0.9817 | 0.9702 | 2.29 g/L | 2.78 g/L |
| S2 | — | 0.87 | — | 10.16 g/L | |
| Model 2 | A1 | 0.9821 | 0.9722 | 2.30 g/L | 2.75 g/L |
| A2 | — | 0.65 | — | 17.22 g/L |