Max de Vries1, Lotta J Seppala1, Joost G Daams2, Esther M M van de Glind1, Tahir Masud3, Nathalie van der Velde4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Medical library, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: n.vandervelde@amc.uva.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Use of certain medications is recognized as a major and modifiable risk factor for falls. Although the literature on psychotropic drugs is compelling, the literature on cardiovascular drugs as potential fall-risk-increasing drugs is conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the associations between cardiovascular medications and fall risk in older adults. METHODS: Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO. Key search concepts were "fall," "aged," "causality," and "medication." Studies that investigated cardiovascular medications as risk factors for falls in participants ≥60 years old or participants with a mean age of 70 or older were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse variance method, pooling unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) separately. RESULTS: In total, 131 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis using adjusted ORs showed significant results (pooled OR [95% confidence interval]) for loop diuretics, OR 1.36 (1.17, 1.57), and beta-blocking agents, OR 0.88 (0.80, 0.97). Meta-analysis using unadjusted ORs showed significant results for digitalis, OR 1.60 (1.08, 2.36); digoxin, OR 2.06 (1.56, 2.74); and statins, OR 0.80 (0.65, 0.98). Most of the meta-analyses resulted in substantial heterogeneity that mostly did not disappear after stratification for population and setting. In a descriptive synthesis, consistent associations were not observed. CONCLUSION: Loop diuretics were significantly associated with increased fall risk, whereas beta-blockers were significantly associated with decreased fall risk. Digitalis and digoxin may increase the risk of falling, and statins may reduce it. For the majority of cardiovascular medication groups, outcomes were inconsistent. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that specific drug properties, such as selectivity of beta-blockers, may affect fall risk, and drug-disease interaction also may play a role. Thus, studies addressing these issues are warranted to obtain a better understanding of drug-related falls.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Use of certain medications is recognized as a major and modifiable risk factor for falls. Although the literature on psychotropic drugs is compelling, the literature on cardiovascular drugs as potential fall-risk-increasing drugs is conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the associations between cardiovascular medications and fall risk in older adults. METHODS: Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO. Key search concepts were "fall," "aged," "causality," and "medication." Studies that investigated cardiovascular medications as risk factors for falls in participants ≥60 years old or participants with a mean age of 70 or older were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the generic inverse variance method, pooling unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) separately. RESULTS: In total, 131 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analysis using adjusted ORs showed significant results (pooled OR [95% confidence interval]) for loop diuretics, OR 1.36 (1.17, 1.57), and beta-blocking agents, OR 0.88 (0.80, 0.97). Meta-analysis using unadjusted ORs showed significant results for digitalis, OR 1.60 (1.08, 2.36); digoxin, OR 2.06 (1.56, 2.74); and statins, OR 0.80 (0.65, 0.98). Most of the meta-analyses resulted in substantial heterogeneity that mostly did not disappear after stratification for population and setting. In a descriptive synthesis, consistent associations were not observed. CONCLUSION: Loop diuretics were significantly associated with increased fall risk, whereas beta-blockers were significantly associated with decreased fall risk. Digitalis and digoxin may increase the risk of falling, and statins may reduce it. For the majority of cardiovascular medication groups, outcomes were inconsistent. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that specific drug properties, such as selectivity of beta-blockers, may affect fall risk, and drug-disease interaction also may play a role. Thus, studies addressing these issues are warranted to obtain a better understanding of drug-related falls.
Authors: Julie A Womack; Terrence E Murphy; Christopher T Rentsch; Janet P Tate; Harini Bathulapalli; Alexandria C Smith; Jonathan Bates; Samah Jarad; Cynthia L Gibert; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Phyllis C Tien; Michael T Yin; Thomas M Gill; Gary Friedlaender; Cynthia A Brandt; Amy C Justice Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Anthony V Herrera; Linda Wastila; Jessica P Brown; Hegang Chen; Steven R Gambert; Jennifer S Albrecht Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2021 Sep-Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Manuel Montero-Odasso; Nathalie van der Velde; Finbarr C Martin; Mirko Petrovic; Maw Pin Tan; Jesper Ryg; Sara Aguilar-Navarro; Neil B Alexander; Clemens Becker; Hubert Blain; Robbie Bourke; Ian D Cameron; Richard Camicioli; Lindy Clemson; Jacqueline Close; Kim Delbaere; Leilei Duan; Gustavo Duque; Suzanne M Dyer; Ellen Freiberger; David A Ganz; Fernando Gómez; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; David B Hogan; Susan M W Hunter; Jose R Jauregui; Nellie Kamkar; Rose-Anne Kenny; Sarah E Lamb; Nancy K Latham; Lewis A Lipsitz; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Pip Logan; Stephen R Lord; Louise Mallet; David Marsh; Koen Milisen; Rogelio Moctezuma-Gallegos; Meg E Morris; Alice Nieuwboer; Monica R Perracini; Frederico Pieruccini-Faria; Alison Pighills; Catherine Said; Ervin Sejdic; Catherine Sherrington; Dawn A Skelton; Sabestina Dsouza; Mark Speechley; Susan Stark; Chris Todd; Bruce R Troen; Tischa van der Cammen; Joe Verghese; Ellen Vlaeyen; Jennifer A Watt; Tahir Masud Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 12.782
Authors: Sultana Monira Hussain; Michael E Ernst; Anna L Barker; Karen L Margolis; Christopher M Reid; Johannes T Neumann; Andrew M Tonkin; Thao Le Thi Phuong; Lawrence J Beilin; Thao Pham; Enayet K Chowdhury; Flavia M Cicuttini; Julia F M Gilmartin-Thomas; Prudence R Carr; John J McNeil Journal: Hypertension Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Lotta J Seppala; Mirko Petrovic; Jesper Ryg; Gulistan Bahat; Eva Topinkova; Katarzyna Szczerbińska; Tischa J M van der Cammen; Sirpa Hartikainen; Birkan Ilhan; Francesco Landi; Yvonne Morrissey; Alpana Mair; Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia; Marielle H Emmelot-Vonk; María Ángeles Caballero Mora; Michael Denkinger; Peter Crome; Stephen H D Jackson; Andrea Correa-Pérez; Wilma Knol; George Soulis; Adalsteinn Gudmundsson; Gijsbertus Ziere; Martin Wehling; Denis O'Mahony; Antonio Cherubini; Nathalie van der Velde Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Shahar Shmuel; Virginia Pate; Marc J Pepin; Janine C Bailey; Yvonne M Golightly; Laura C Hanson; Til Stürmer; Rebecca B Naumann; Danijela Gnjidic; Jennifer L Lund Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 5.562