Literature DB >> 29396079

Review of Factors Influencing Women's Choice of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conserving Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Jeffrey Gu1, Gary Groot2, Catherine Boden3, Angela Busch4, Lorraine Holtslander5, Hyun Lim6.   

Abstract

We have performed a narrative synthesis. A literature search was conducted between January 2000 and June 2014 in 7 databases. The initial search identified 2717 articles; 319 underwent abstract screening, 67 underwent full-text screening, and 25 final articles were included. This review looked at early stage breast cancer in women only, excluding ductal carcinoma in situ and advanced breast cancer. A conceptual framework was created to organize the central constructs underlying women's choices: clinicopathologic factors, physician factors, and individual factors with subgroups of sociodemographic, geographic, and personal beliefs and preferences. This framework guided our review's synthesis and analysis. We found that larger tumor size and increasing stage was associated with increased rates of mastectomy. The results for age varied, but suggested that old and young extremes of diagnostic age were associated with an increased likelihood of mastectomy. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with higher breast conservation therapy (BCT) rates. Resident rural location and increasing distance from radiation treatment facilities were associated with lower rates of BCT. Individual belief factors influencing women's choice of mastectomy (mastectomy being reassuring, avoiding radiation, an expedient treatment) differed from factors influencing choice of BCT (body image and femininity, physician recommendation, survival equivalence, less surgery). Surgeon factors, including female gender, higher case numbers, and individual surgeon practice, were associated with increased BCT rates. The decision-making process for women with early stage breast cancer is complicated and affected by multiple factors. Organizing these factors into central constructs of clinicopathologic, individual, and physician factors may aid health-care professionals to better understand this process.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast conserving surgery; Decision-making; Geography; Oncology; Treatment choice

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29396079     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  36 in total

1.  Racial Differences in Time to Breast Cancer Surgery and Overall Survival in the US Military Health System.

Authors:  Yvonne L Eaglehouse; Matthew W Georg; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Determinants of Breast-Conserving Therapy in the Asian Population: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Paz Galeano Machuca; Shelly Chien-Chien Cheng; Tony Hong-Ting Jou; Chih-Tao Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Outcomes of selective whole breast irradiation following lumpectomy with intraoperative radiation therapy for hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristy Broman; Weihong Sun; Jun-Min Zhou; Brooke Fridley; Roberto Diaz; Christine Laronga
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Mastectomy alone for pT1-2 pN0-1 breast cancer patients: when postmastectomy radiotherapy is indicated.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Leonardi; Ida Rosalia Scognamiglio; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Giovanni Corso; Patrick Maisonneuve; Samantha Dicuonzo; Damaris Patricia Rojas; Maria Alessia Zerella; Anna Morra; Marianna Alessandra Gerardi; Mattia Zaffaroni; Alessandra De Scalzi; Antonia Girardi; Francesca Magnoni; Emilia Montagna; Cristiana Iuliana Fodor; Viviana Enrica Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Roberto Orecchia; Roberto Pacelli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Racial Differences in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Impact on Breast and Axillary Surgical Management.

Authors:  Theresa Relation; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Yaming Li; Mariam F Eskander; Allan Tsung; Bridget A Oppong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Mastectomy versus breast-conservation therapy: an examination of how individual, clinicopathologic, and physician factors influence decision-making.

Authors:  J Gu; M Delisle; R Engler-Stringer; G Groot
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Assessment of the quality of life in breast cancer depending on the surgical treatment.

Authors:  Mirjana Marinkovic; Nebojsa Djordjevic; Lidija Djordjevic; Nebojsa Ignjatovic; Miodrag Djordjevic; Vesna Karanikolic
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The prognostic and predictive value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system among early breast cancer patients aged <50 years.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Chen-Lu Lian; Ping Zhou; Jian Lei; Li Hua; Zhen-Yu He; San-Gang Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

9.  Acceptability of 3D-printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Lumarie Santiago; Robert J Volk; Cristina M Checka; Dalliah Black; Joanna Lee; Jessica S Colen; Catherine Akay; Abigail Caudle; Henry Kuerer; Elsa M Arribas
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Breast surgery for young women with early-stage breast cancer: Mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy?

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Sun; Chuang Chen; Xin-Wen Kuang; Jun-Long Song; Sheng-Rong Sun; Wei-Xing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.