Sheila Fraser1, Olov Norlén2, Kyle Bender1, Joanne Davidson3, Sonya Bajenov3, David Fahey3, Shawn Li3, Stan Sidhu1, Mark Sywak4. 1. University of Sydney, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Sydney, Australia. 2. University of Sydney, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Sydney, Australia; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Department of Anaesthesia, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 4. University of Sydney, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: marksywak@nebsc.com.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has gained widespread acceptance for the removal of benign adrenal tumors. Higher insufflation pressures using carbon dioxide (CO2) are required, although the ideal starting pressure is unclear. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, study aims to compare physiologic differences with 2 different CO2 insufflation pressures during posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to a starting insufflation pressure of 20 mm Hg (low pressure) or 25 mm Hg (high pressure). The primary outcome measure was partial pressure of arterial CO2 at 60 minutes. Secondary outcomes included end-tidal CO2, arterial pH, blood pressure, and peak airway pressure. Breaches of protocol to change insufflation pressure were permitted if required and were recorded. RESULTS: A prospective randomized trial including 31 patients (low pressure: n = 16; high pressure: n = 15) was undertaken. At 60 minutes, the high pressure group had greater mean partial pressure of arterial CO2 (64 vs 50 mm Hg, P = .003) and end-tidal CO2 (54 vs 45 mm Hg, P = .008) and a lesser pH (7.21 vs 7.29, P = .0005). There were no significant differences in base excess, peak airway pressure, operative time, or duration of hospital stay. Clinically indicated protocol breaches were more common in the low pressure than the high pressure group (8 vs 3, P = .03). CONCLUSION: In posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy, greater insufflation pressures are associated with greater partial pressure of arterial CO2 and end-tidal CO2 and lesser pH at 60 minutes, be significant. Commencing with lesser CO2 insufflation pressures decreases intraoperative acidosis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has gained widespread acceptance for the removal of benign adrenal tumors. Higher insufflation pressures using carbon dioxide (CO2) are required, although the ideal starting pressure is unclear. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, study aims to compare physiologic differences with 2 different CO2insufflation pressures during posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. METHODS:Participants were randomly assigned to a starting insufflation pressure of 20 mm Hg (low pressure) or 25 mm Hg (high pressure). The primary outcome measure was partial pressure of arterial CO2 at 60 minutes. Secondary outcomes included end-tidal CO2, arterial pH, blood pressure, and peak airway pressure. Breaches of protocol to change insufflation pressure were permitted if required and were recorded. RESULTS: A prospective randomized trial including 31 patients (low pressure: n = 16; high pressure: n = 15) was undertaken. At 60 minutes, the high pressure group had greater mean partial pressure of arterial CO2 (64 vs 50 mm Hg, P = .003) and end-tidal CO2 (54 vs 45 mm Hg, P = .008) and a lesser pH (7.21 vs 7.29, P = .0005). There were no significant differences in base excess, peak airway pressure, operative time, or duration of hospital stay. Clinically indicated protocol breaches were more common in the low pressure than the high pressure group (8 vs 3, P = .03). CONCLUSION: In posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy, greater insufflation pressures are associated with greater partial pressure of arterial CO2 and end-tidal CO2 and lesser pH at 60 minutes, be significant. Commencing with lesser CO2insufflation pressures decreases intraoperative acidosis.
Authors: Oliver Strobel; Adrian Billeter; Franck Billmann; Oliver Thomusch; Tobias Keck; Ewan Andrew Langan; Aylin Pfeiffer; Felix Nickel; Beat Peter Müller-Stich Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 4.584