Literature DB >> 29395201

Duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and survival in cardiovascular surgery patients.

Klaus Distelmaier1, Dominik Wiedemann2, Christina Binder1, Thomas Haberl3, Daniel Zimpfer3, Gottfried Heinz1, Herbert Koinig4, Alessia Felli5, Barbara Steinlechner5, Alexander Niessner1, Günther Laufer3, Irene M Lang1, Georg Goliasch1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The overall therapeutic goal of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with postcardiotomy shock is bridging to myocardial recovery. However, in patients with irreversible myocardial damage prolonged ECMO treatment would cause a delay or even withholding of further permanent potentially life-saving therapeutic options. We therefore assessed the prognostic effect of duration of ECMO support on survival in adult patients after cardiovascular surgery.
METHODS: We enrolled into our single-center registry a total of 354 patients who underwent venoarterial ECMO support after cardiovascular surgery at a university-affiliated tertiary care center.
RESULTS: Through a median follow-up period of 45 months (interquartile range, 20-81 months), 245 patients (69%) died. We observed an increase in mortality with increasing duration of ECMO support. The association between increased duration of ECMO support and mortality persisted in patients who survived ECMO support with a crude hazard ratio of 1.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.74; P < .001) for 2-year mortality compared with the third tertile and the second tertile of ECMO duration. This effect was even more pronounced after multivariate adjustment using a bootstrap-selected confounder model with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-3.48; P < .001) for 2-year long-term mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged venoarterial ECMO support is associated with poor outcome in adult patients after cardiovascular surgery. Our data suggest reevaluation of therapeutic strategies after 7 days of ECMO support because mortality disproportionally increases afterward.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular surgery; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mortality; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29395201     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  8 in total

Review 1.  Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: part 1-Adult patients.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Khalid Alenizy; Niels Sluijpers; Maged Makhoul; Daniel Brodie; Mike McMullan; I-Wen Wang; Paolo Meani; Graeme MacLaren; Mariusz Kowalewski; Heidi Dalton; Ryan Barbaro; Xiaotong Hou; Nicholas Cavarocchi; Yih-Sharng Chen; Ravi Thiagarajan; Peta Alexander; Bahaaldin Alsoufi; Christian A Bermudez; Ashish S Shah; Jonathan Haft; David A D'Alessandro; Udo Boeken; Glenn J R Whitman
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Use of 90-day mortality does not change assessment of hospital quality after coronary artery bypass grafting in New York State.

Authors:  Aaron Mittel; Dae Hyun Kim; Zara Cooper; Michael Argenziano; May Hua
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  The impact of Centre's heart transplant status and volume on in-hospital outcomes following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariusz Kowalewski; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Kamil Zieliński; Musab Alanazi; Martijn Gilbers; Sam Heuts; Ehsan Natour; Elham Bidar; Rick Schreurs; Thijs Delnoij; Rob Driessen; Jan-Willem Sels; Marcel van de Poll; Paul Roekaerts; Paolo Meani; Jos Maessen; Piotr Suwalski; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Prophylactic versus therapeutic left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, better safe than sorry?

Authors:  Pieter S van der Wal; Myrthe P J van Steenwijk; Leon J Montenij; Dirk W Donker; Christiaan L Meuwese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Neutrophil-lymphoycyte-ratio, platelet-lymphocyte-ratio and procalcitonin for early assessment of prognosis in patients undergoing VA-ECMO.

Authors:  Ragnar Huhn; Hug Aubin; Sebastian Roth; René M'Pembele; Alexandra Stroda; Catrin Jansen; Giovanna Lurati Buse; Udo Boeken; Payam Akhyari; Artur Lichtenberg; Markus W Hollmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Contemporary analysis of charges and mortality in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A cautionary tale.

Authors:  J W Awori Hayanga; Jonathan Aboagye; Errol Bush; Joseph Canner; Heather K Hayanga; Alyssa Klingbeil; Paul McCarthy; James Fugett; Ghulam Abbas; Vinay Badhwar
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Commentary: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Is it life-saving and cost effective for all patients?

Authors:  Harold L Lazar
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-03

8.  Impact of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Alkaline Phosphatase Metabolism after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Poschner; Anne-Kristin Schaefer; Doris Hutschala; Georg Goliasch; Julia Riebandt; Klaus Distelmaier; Martin H Bernardi; Martin Andreas; Ruud Brands; Tandis Aref; Günther Laufer; Dominik Wiedemann
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.