Literature DB >> 29394396

Prevalence of and factors associated with MDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England and Wales between 2004 and 2015: analysis of annual cross-sectional surveillance surveys.

Soazig Clifton1, Hikaru Bolt2, Hamish Mohammed2, Katy Town2, Martina Furegato2, Michelle Cole2, Oona Campbell3, Helen Fifer2, Gwenda Hughes2.   

Abstract

Objectives: To describe trends in prevalence, susceptibility profile and risk factors for MDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MDR-NG) in England and Wales.
Methods: Isolates from 16 242 gonorrhoea episodes at sexual health clinics within the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing. MDR-NG was defined as resistance to ceftriaxone, cefixime or azithromycin, plus at least two of penicillin, ciprofloxacin and spectinomycin. Trends in resistance are presented for 2004-15; prevalence and logistic regression analyses for MDR-NG cover the period of the most recent treatment guideline (ceftriaxone plus azithromycin), 2011-15.
Results: Between 2004 and 2015, the proportion of N. gonorrhoeae isolates fully susceptible to all antimicrobial classes fell from 80% to 46%, with the proportion resistant to multiple (two or more) classes increasing from 7.3% to 17.5%. In 2011-15, 3.5% of isolates were MDR-NG, most of which were resistant to cefixime (100% in 2011, decreasing to 36.9% in 2015) and/or azithromycin (4.2% in 2011, increasing to 84.3% in 2015). After excluding azithromycin-resistant isolates, modal azithromycin MICs were higher in MDR versus non-MDR isolates (0.5 versus 0.125 mg/L), with similar results for ceftriaxone (modal MICs 0.03 versus ≤0.002 mg/L). After adjustment for confounders, MDR-NG was more common among isolates from heterosexual men, although absolute differences in prevalence were small [4.6% versus 3.3% (MSM) and 2.5% (women)]. Conclusions: N. gonorrhoeae is becoming less susceptible to available antimicrobials. Since 2011, a minority of isolates were MDR-NG; however, MICs of azithromycin or ceftriaxone (first-line therapies) for many of these were elevated. These findings highlight the importance of continued antimicrobial stewardship for gonorrhoea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29394396     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: a global perspective.

Authors:  Robert D Kirkcaldy; Emily Weston; Aluisio C Segurado; Gwenda Hughes
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.706

2.  Antimicrobial Consumption and Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A Global Ecological Analysis.

Authors:  Chris Kenyon; Jozefien Buyze; Teodora Wi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-27

3.  Surveillance systems to monitor antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a global, systematic review, 1 January 2012 to 27 September 2020.

Authors:  Nicholas A Medland; Ye Zhang; Praveena Gunaratnam; David A Lewis; Basil Donovan; David M Whiley; Rebecca J Guy; John M Kaldor
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2022-05

Review 4.  Azithromycin resistant gonococci: a literature review.

Authors:  Awoke Derbie; Daniel Mekonnen; Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel; Tamrat Abebe
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.887

5.  Does gonorrhoea screening intensity play a role in the early selection of antimicrobial resistance in men who have sex with men (MSM)? A comparative study of Belgium and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Chris R Kenyon; Irith De Baetselier; Tania Crucitti
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 6.  Epidemiological Trends of Antibiotic Resistant Gonorrhoea in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Lilith K Whittles; Peter J White; John Paul; Xavier Didelot
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.