C Purcell1, S P Batke1,2, C Yiotis1, R Caballero3, W K Soh1, M Murray1, J C McElwain4. 1. School of Biology and Environmental Science, Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland. 2. Department of Biology, Edge Hill University, St. Helens Road, Ormskirk, UK. 3. Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Botany Department, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Studies have indicated that plant stomatal conductance (gs) decreases in response to elevated atmospheric CO2, a phenomenon of significance for the global hydrological cycle. However, gs increases across certain CO2 ranges have been predicted by optimization models. The aim of this work was to demonstrate that under certain environmental conditions, gs can increase in response to elevated CO2. Methods: Using (1) an extensive, up-to-date synthesis of gs responses in free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)experiments, (2) in situ measurements across four biomes showing dynamic gs responses to a CO2 rise of ~50 ppm (characterizing the change in this greenhouse gas over the past three decades) and (3) a photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model, it is demonstrated that gs can in some cases increase in response to increasing atmospheric CO2. Key Results: Field observations are corroborated by an extensive synthesis of gs responses in FACE experiments showing that 11.8 % of gs responses under experimentally elevated CO2 are positive. They are further supported by a strong data-model fit (r2 = 0.607) using a stomatal optimization model applied to the field gs dataset. A parameter space identified in the Farquhar-Ball-Berry photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model confirms field observations of increasing gs under elevated CO2 in hot dry conditions. Contrary to the general assumption, positive gs responses to elevated CO2, although relatively rare, are a feature of woody taxa adapted to warm, low-humidity conditions, and this response is also demonstrated in global simulations using the Community Land Model (CLM4). Conclusions: The results contradict the over-simplistic notion that global vegetation always responds with decreasing gs to elevated CO2, a finding that has important implications for predicting future vegetation feedbacks on the hydrological cycle at the regional level.
Background and Aims: Studies have indicated that plant stomatal conductance (gs) decreases in response to elevated atmospheric CO2, a phenomenon of significance for the global hydrological cycle. However, gs increases across certain CO2 ranges have been predicted by optimization models. The aim of this work was to demonstrate that under certain environmental conditions, gs can increase in response to elevated CO2. Methods: Using (1) an extensive, up-to-date synthesis of gs responses in free air CO2 enrichment (FACE)experiments, (2) in situ measurements across four biomes showing dynamic gs responses to a CO2 rise of ~50 ppm (characterizing the change in this greenhouse gas over the past three decades) and (3) a photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model, it is demonstrated that gs can in some cases increase in response to increasing atmospheric CO2. Key Results: Field observations are corroborated by an extensive synthesis of gs responses in FACE experiments showing that 11.8 % of gs responses under experimentally elevated CO2 are positive. They are further supported by a strong data-model fit (r2 = 0.607) using a stomatal optimization model applied to the field gs dataset. A parameter space identified in the Farquhar-Ball-Berry photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model confirms field observations of increasing gs under elevated CO2 in hot dry conditions. Contrary to the general assumption, positive gs responses to elevated CO2, although relatively rare, are a feature of woody taxa adapted to warm, low-humidity conditions, and this response is also demonstrated in global simulations using the Community Land Model (CLM4). Conclusions: The results contradict the over-simplistic notion that global vegetation always responds with decreasing gs to elevated CO2, a finding that has important implications for predicting future vegetation feedbacks on the hydrological cycle at the regional level.
Authors: Tomas Ferreira Domingues; Patrick Meir; Ted R Feldpausch; Gustavo Saiz; Elmar M Veenendaal; Franziska Schrodt; Michael Bird; Gloria Djagbletey; Fidele Hien; Halidou Compaore; Adama Diallo; John Grace; Jon Lloyd Journal: Plant Cell Environ Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 7.228
Authors: Brendan Choat; Steven Jansen; Tim J Brodribb; Hervé Cochard; Sylvain Delzon; Radika Bhaskar; Sandra J Bucci; Taylor S Feild; Sean M Gleason; Uwe G Hacke; Anna L Jacobsen; Frederic Lens; Hafiz Maherali; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Stefan Mayr; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick J Mitchell; Andrea Nardini; Jarmila Pittermann; R Brandon Pratt; John S Sperry; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Amy E Zanne Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jean-Marc Limousin; Christopher P Bickford; Lee T Dickman; Robert E Pangle; Patrick J Hudson; Amanda L Boutz; Nathan Gehres; Jessica L Osuna; William T Pockman; Nate G McDowell Journal: Plant Cell Environ Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 7.228
Authors: Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Alistair Rogers; Herbert Blum; Josef Nosberger; Stephen P Long Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2003-10-29 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Lucy Rowland; Raquel L Lobo-do-Vale; Bradley O Christoffersen; Eliane A Melém; Bart Kruijt; Steel S Vasconcelos; Tomas Domingues; Oliver J Binks; Alex A R Oliveira; Daniel Metcalfe; Antonio C L da Costa; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick Meir Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Sven Batke; Aidan Holohan; Roisin Hayden; Wieland Fricke; Amanda Sara Porter; Christiana Marie Evans-Fitz Gerald Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Rossella Guerrieri; Soumaya Belmecheri; Scott V Ollinger; Heidi Asbjornsen; Katie Jennings; Jingfeng Xiao; Benjamin D Stocker; Mary Martin; David Y Hollinger; Rosvel Bracho-Garrillo; Kenneth Clark; Sabina Dore; Thomas Kolb; J William Munger; Kimberly Novick; Andrew D Richardson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 11.205