Katherine E Cameron1, Martha B Kole1,2, Mary D Sammel3, Jill P Ginsberg4, Yasmin Gosiengfiao5, Jennifer E Mersereau6, H Irene Su7, Clarisa R Gracia1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics & Women's Health Clinical Research Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Division of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in young cancer survivors immediately following the completion of chemotherapy. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed 124 young females with a new diagnosis of cancer requiring chemotherapy to assess symptoms of menopause before treatment and immediately following chemotherapy. Symptoms were compared before and after treatment using the McNemar test and between cancer patients and 133 similar-aged healthy controls using Pearson χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Participants undergoing cancer therapy reported more menopausal symptoms compared to controls prior to the initiation of any treatment (hot flashes or night sweats 33 vs. 7%, p < 0.01, trouble sleeping 57 vs. 31%, p < 0.01, headaches 50 vs. 35%, p = 0.02, and decreased libido 36 vs. 16%, p < 0.01) and also reported a greater prevalence of symptoms immediately after cancer therapy compared to pretreatment prevalence (vasomotor symptoms, p < 0.01, vaginal dryness, p < 0.01, decreased concentration, p < 0.01, and body aches, p = 0.01). Cancer patients with lower anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels after treatment (<0.10 ng/mL) had an increased risk of vasomotor symptoms (OR 2.2, p = 0.04), mood swings (OR 2.4, p = 0.03), feeling sad (OR 2.2, p = 0.04), trouble sleeping (OR 2.7, p = 0.02), and decreased libido (OR 3.0, p = 0.03) when controlled for age and cancer type, and the incidence of these symptoms was not affected by the use of systemic hormones or psychiatric medications. Treatment length, use of alkylating agents, pelvic radiation, and marital status were also not associated with the prevalence of menopausal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal women with a new cancer diagnosis have more menopausal symptoms than females of similar age before and after cancer treatment, the effects of which are not mitigated by systemic hormone use. Decreased AMH levels were associated with an increased likelihood of reporting physiologic symptoms after therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This information is imperative for counseling; ultimately, improved symptom management during and after cancer therapies will improve quality of life in young cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in young cancer survivors immediately following the completion of chemotherapy. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed 124 young females with a new diagnosis of cancer requiring chemotherapy to assess symptoms of menopause before treatment and immediately following chemotherapy. Symptoms were compared before and after treatment using the McNemar test and between cancerpatients and 133 similar-aged healthy controls using Pearson χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS:Participants undergoing cancer therapy reported more menopausal symptoms compared to controls prior to the initiation of any treatment (hot flashes or night sweats 33 vs. 7%, p < 0.01, trouble sleeping 57 vs. 31%, p < 0.01, headaches 50 vs. 35%, p = 0.02, and decreased libido 36 vs. 16%, p < 0.01) and also reported a greater prevalence of symptoms immediately after cancer therapy compared to pretreatment prevalence (vasomotor symptoms, p < 0.01, vaginal dryness, p < 0.01, decreased concentration, p < 0.01, and body aches, p = 0.01). Cancerpatients with lower anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels after treatment (<0.10 ng/mL) had an increased risk of vasomotor symptoms (OR 2.2, p = 0.04), mood swings (OR 2.4, p = 0.03), feeling sad (OR 2.2, p = 0.04), trouble sleeping (OR 2.7, p = 0.02), and decreased libido (OR 3.0, p = 0.03) when controlled for age and cancer type, and the incidence of these symptoms was not affected by the use of systemic hormones or psychiatric medications. Treatment length, use of alkylating agents, pelvic radiation, and marital status were also not associated with the prevalence of menopausal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal women with a new cancer diagnosis have more menopausal symptoms than females of similar age before and after cancer treatment, the effects of which are not mitigated by systemic hormone use. Decreased AMH levels were associated with an increased likelihood of reporting physiologic symptoms after therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This information is imperative for counseling; ultimately, improved symptom management during and after cancer therapies will improve quality of life in young cancer survivors.
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Lidia Schapira; Mary E Abusief; Meghan E Meyer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Menopause Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Jeanne A Petrek; Michelle J Naughton; L Douglas Case; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth Z Naftalis; S Eva Singletary; Paniti Sukumvanich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nadine Tchen; Helen G Juffs; Fiona P Downie; Qi-Long Yi; Hanxian Hu; Irene Chemerynsky; Mark Clemons; Michael Crump; Paul E Goss; David Warr; Mary E Tweedale; Ian F Tannock Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wassim Chemaitilly; Ann C Mertens; Pauline Mitby; John Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Charles A Sklar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 6.134