Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Droxidopa After Dosing in the Fed Versus Fasted State and with 3-Times-Daily Dosing in Healthy Elderly Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Droxidopa is an oral prodrug of norepinephrine approved for the treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. This two-part, randomized, crossover study evaluated the 24-h pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa in 24 healthy elderly subjects.
METHODS: Noncompartmental analysis was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time of Cmax (tmax), and elimination half-life (t½e) of droxidopa and metabolites. Droxidopa was administered in the fed (high-fat/high-calorie meal) or fasted state either as a single 300-mg dose (three 100-mg capsules) or 3 times/day (TID) (three 100-mg capsules) at 4-h intervals.
RESULTS: Administration of a single droxidopa dose in the fed versus fasted state decreased mean Cmax (2057 vs 3160 ng/mL) and mean AUC (10,927 vs 13,857 h × ng/mL) and increased median tmax twofold (4.00 vs 2.00 h). Differences between the fed and fasted state for mean t½e (2.58 vs 2.68 h) were not observed. Fed versus fasted geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC were 66% [90% confidence interval (CI) 60.7-71.7] and 80% (90% CI 72.6-88.1), respectively. With TID dosing, similar values for Cmax were observed after each dose (range 2789-3389 ng/mL) with no return to baseline between doses. Norepinephrine Cmax was 895 pg/mL following dose 1, with no further increases upon subsequent doses; norepinephrine levels remained above baseline for 12-16 h after dose 1.
CONCLUSIONS: Absorption of a single dose of droxidopa is slowed after a high-fat/high-calorie meal; for consistent effect, administer droxidopa in the same manner (with or without food). Pharmacokinetic parameters of droxidopa are similar after single and TID dosing. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01149629.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes

Key Points

Introduction

Droxidopa (l-threo-dihydroxyphenylserine) is a synthetic catecholamine prodrug that is converted to norepinephrine by dopa decarboxylase (DDC), the same enzyme that is responsible for the conversion of levodopa to dopamine (Fig. 1) [1, 2]. Droxidopa is also metabolized by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) to 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine; this is the major degradation product identified in tissue, serum, and urine [1, 2]. Norepinephrine is the key neurotransmitter responsible for mediating autonomic cardiovascular responses to orthostatic change [i.e., increases in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate]. These hemodynamic responses to orthostatic stress are required to avoid end-organ hypoperfusion, particularly that of the central nervous system, by countering the gravitationally induced shift in blood volume to the lower extremities, including the splanchnic capacitance vessels, caused by standing [1, 3].

Fig. 1

Metabolism of droxidopa

Inadequate physiologic compensation during a positional change (i.e., supine or sitting to standing) may result in orthostatic hypotension (OH), which is defined as a sustained BP reduction (≥ 20 mmHg systolic or ≥ 10 mmHg diastolic) within 3 min of standing or head-up tilt [3]. Patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy (MSA), or pure autonomic failure may frequently develop neurogenic OH (nOH) because of impaired norepinephrine release associated with autonomic failure [3].

Droxidopa has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of orthostatic dizziness, lightheadedness, or the “feeling that you are about to black out” in adult patients with symptomatic nOH caused by primary autonomic failure in Parkinson disease, MSA, or pure autonomic failure; dopamine β-hydroxylase deficiency; or nondiabetic autonomic neuropathy [4]. The efficacy and safety of droxidopa have been shown in three randomized controlled trials of patients with nOH associated with these underlying conditions [5-8].

Previously, pharmacokinetic studies have reported droxidopa and norepinephrine levels achieved after administration of a single dose of droxidopa in patients with symptomatic nOH resulting from autonomic failure conditions (MSA or pure autonomic failure) [9, 10]. The current study assesses (1) the pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa after single-dose administration, with and without food; and (2) changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa and its metabolites (norepinephrine and 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine) associated with multiple daily dosing.

Methods

Study Design

The study protocol was approved by the PRACS Institute Institutional Review Board (Fargo, ND), and the study was conducted in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before the initiation of study procedures. This two-part prospective study was performed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa and metabolites in healthy elderly subjects. In part 1, which used a randomized crossover design, subjects received a single 300-mg dose (three 100-mg capsules) of droxidopa in either a fasted or fed state, with each state separated by a washout period (Fig. 2). In part 2, subjects returned and received 300-mg doses (three 100-mg capsules) of droxidopa three times per day (TID) (4-h intervals).

Fig. 2

Study design. TID 3 times daily

Subjects

Men and women (nonpregnant, nonlactating) aged ≥ 65 years with a body mass index of 18.0–35.0 kg/m2 without any clinically significant abnormal clinical findings (i.e., medical history, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, 12-lead safety electrocardiogram results, or physical examination) were eligible to participate. Key exclusion criteria included presence of clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, endocrine, hepatic, neurologic, psychiatric, immunologic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, or metabolic disease not currently controlled with medical treatment, or presence of an active malignancy other than nonmelanomatous skin malignancies. Individuals with a history of relevant food and/or drug allergy or medication use (e.g., catecholamine-containing preparations) that could affect the pharmacokinetic or safety evaluation were also not eligible for participation.

Treatments and Assessments

In part 1 on the fasted dosing day, subjects received a single oral dose of three 100-mg capsules of droxidopa with water (240 mL) at approximately 8:00 a.m. after a minimum 10-h fast; subjects remained fasting until 4 h after dosing. On the fed dosing day, subjects received a standard high-calorie, high-fat breakfast at 7:30 a.m., which was to be consumed in the 30-min period before receiving droxidopa with water (240 mL) at approximately 8:00 a.m. This high-calorie, high-fat meal was prepared according to specifications outlined by a guidance from the US FDA on food-effect bioavailability and fed bioequivalence studies [11] and contained 1020 calories, including 58–75 g of fat and 500–600 calories from fat (49–59%). There was a 3-day washout [to allow for elimination of droxidopa based on the previously identified elimination half-life (t½e)] between dosing days. Subjects remained in the study unit from the afternoon before dosing to 24 h after the dose of droxidopa; during this period, they were prohibited from strenuous activity. The plasma concentration of droxidopa was determined from venous blood samples taken in the semi-recumbent position after resting [10 mL collected in a tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a stabilizer] obtained before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h after dosing.

In part 2, the same subjects returned 7 days after completion of part 1 and received three doses of droxidopa 300 mg (three 100-mg capsules) at 4-h intervals. The first dose was administered at approximately 8:00 a.m. after an overnight fast, and the second and third doses were administered at approximately 12:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m., respectively. Subjects were given a standard moderate-fat meal at 10:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. The plasma concentrations of droxidopa, 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine, and norepinephrine were determined from venous blood samples taken in the semi-recumbent position after resting (10 mL collected in a tube containing EDTA as a stabilizer) obtained before the first dose of droxidopa and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 (before dose 2), 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7, 8 (before dose 3), 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 24 h after dosing.

In all treatment arms, water could be consumed as desired except 1 h before and after dosing. Caffeine-free soda and noncitrus fruit juice were allowed as desired 4 h after dosing treatment in part 1 and any time during part 2 except for the 2-h periods before and after dosing.

Safety

During both parts of the study, safety was monitored by reported and observed adverse events (AEs), serial seated vital signs, resting 12-lead electrocardiograms, and assessments of clinical laboratory values and physical examination findings.

Pharmacokinetic and Statistical Analyses

Validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) methods were used to measure plasma concentrations of droxidopa, 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine, and norepinephrine. Droxidopa was extracted from dipotassium EDTA human plasma treated with reduced l-glutathione (2.0 mg/mL) and ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) (1.35 mg/mL) using an alumina solid phase column and perchloric acid (1 M) diluted with acetonitrile as the eluent; [13C7]-droxidopa was used as an internal standard. After extraction, the samples were injected into an API 4000 (SCIEX, Framingham, MA) LC–MS/MS system using a Primesep 200 column (SIELC Technologies, Wheeling IL) and a water/acetonitrile/formate mobile phase. Tandem MS monitoring was used to detect positive ions produced by the TurboIonSpray ionization source {m/z for droxidopa: 214.0 (parent), 152.1 (product); m/z for [13C7]-droxidopa: 221.0 (parent), 159.1 (product)}.

3-Methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine was extracted from dipotassium EDTA human plasma treated with reduced l-glutathione (2.0 mg/mL) and EGTA (1.35 mg/mL) by protein precipitation with acetonitrile; [13C7]-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl serine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard. A portion of the supernatant was transferred to a clean plate and diluted with acetonitrile. LC–MS/MS and detection methods were the same as described above for droxidopa {m/z for 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine: 228.1 (parent), 166.2 (product); m/z for [13C7]- 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine: 234.1 (parent), 172.2 (product)}.

Norepinephrine was extracted from dipotassium EDTA human plasma treated with reduced l-glutathione (2.0 mg/mL) and EGTA (1.35 mg/mL) using acid-washed aluminum oxide in 96-square-well filter plates; ethylnorepinephrine was used as an internal standard. Following extraction, the analyte was eluted from the substrate using perchloric acid (0.1 M). The eluate was then diluted with 3 M chloroacetate buffer (5.0 μL) and injected on a liquid chromatograph with an electrochemical detection system. Norepinephrine and ethylnorepinephrine were separated using an Atlantis® dC18 analytical column (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and chloroacetate buffer (pH ~ 3.4) containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and disodium EDTA; a single 3-mm glassy carbon working electrode at a potential of + 725 mV versus a gold/gold chloride reference electrode was used for electrochemical detection.

For all pharmacokinetic analyses, actual blood sampling times were used. Noncompartmental analysis was used to measure the pharmacokinetic parameters of droxidopa (parts 1 and 2) and for the two metabolites in part 2 (3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine and norepinephrine).

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to achieve Cmax (tmax) were derived directly from the data. Area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) to the final sample with a concentration greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. Respective LLOQs for droxidopa, norepinephrine, and 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine were 5 ng/mL, 50 pg/mL, and 5 ng/mL. Apparent terminal t½e was calculated from 0.693 divided by the elimination rate constant (determined from the negative slope of the terminal log-linear segment of the plasma concentration–time curve). For norepinephrine, t½e was not estimated because log-linear decay is not observed, as the return to endogenous levels is not constant. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for the fed-to-fasted ratio using the log-transformed data and the two one-sided t tests procedure. All pharmacokinetic calculations and statistical analyses were performed using SAS® for Windows® version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Results

Demographic Characteristics

A total of 24 subjects (79% women) were included in the study {mean [standard deviation (SD)] age 70.2 (4.0) years; Table 1}. One subject vomited 3.2 h after dosing under a fed state in part 1. Data for this individual under the fed state were excluded from all descriptive statistics and statistical analyses. All subjects completed both parts of the study.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Variablea	Droxidopa(n = 24)
Women, n (%)	19 (79.2)
White, n (%)	24 (100.0)
Age, years	70.2 (4.0)
Body mass index, kg/m2	27.3 (3.7)
Venous plasma norepinephrine, pg/mL	577 (220)

SD standard deviation

aValues are represented as mean (SD) unless otherwise noted

Pharmacokinetic

Part 1: Fed Versus Fasted

Administration of a single dose of droxidopa with a high-fat, high-calorie meal decreased mean plasma concentration compared with dosing in the fasted state (Fig. 3). Decreases in Cmax and AUC were observed (Table 2) after administration with food compared with the fasted state. The geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC in fed versus fasted subjects were 66% (90% CI 60.7–71.7) and 80% (90% CI 72.6–88.1), respectively. Administration with food increased the median tmax for droxidopa twofold versus the fasted state. No differences in t½e were noted between the fed versus fasted states. These data suggest that the differences observed for fed versus fasted administration of droxidopa are related to the extent of absorption and not clearance.

Fig. 3

Comparison of mean droxidopa plasma concentrations* for fed† vs fasted administration (linear axes). *Mean (SD) concentration per time point. †High-fat, high-calorie meal. SD standard deviation

Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters for droxidopa (three 100-mg capsules) after feda and fasted oral administration

Variable	Fed(n = 23)b	Fasted(n = 24)	Fed vs fastedgeometric mean ratio, % (90% CI)
Mean (SD) Cmax, ng/mLc	2057 (611)	3160 (1089)	66.0 (60.7–71.7)
Median (range) tmax, h	4.00 (3.00–6.00)	2.00 (1.00–3.05)	ND
Mean (SD) AUC, h × ng/mL	10,927 (2801)	13,857 (4915)	80.0 (72.6–88.1)
Mean (SD) t½e, h	2.58 (0.39)	2.68 (0.28)	ND

AUC area under the plasma concentration–time curve to the final sample with a concentration ≥ lower limit of quantification, CI confidence interval, C peak plasma concentration, ND not determined, SD standard deviation, t½e elimination half-life, t time to maximum plasma concentration

aHigh-fat, high-calorie meal

b1 subject vomited 3.2 h after dosing. Data for this individual were excluded from descriptive statistics and statistical analyses of variables

cMaximum value per patient

Part 2: TID Dosing

The plasma concentration of droxidopa over 24 h with TID dosing is shown in Fig. 4a. Relatively little change in the plasma concentration–time profile of droxidopa from dose to dose was observed. With TID administration of droxidopa, Cmax of droxidopa was similar after each dose (range 2789–3389 ng/mL), and a between-dose return to baseline levels was not observed (Table 3). However, an increase in droxidopa plasma concentration would be expected with each dose given at 4-h intervals based on the t½e of approximately 2.5 h (found in part 1). The observed pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa TID dosing may be attributed to food effects and the timing of dosing. The first dose was administered under fasted conditions, and the second and third doses were each administered 2 h after a meal (based on the 4-h dosing interval). Thus, food effects could account for the less-than-expected increases in Cmax after the second and third doses.

Fig. 4

Mean (SD) plasma concentrations (linear axes) after droxidopa TID administration: a droxidopa, b norepinephrine, and c 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine. Arrows indicate time of dose administration. SD standard deviation, TID 3 times daily

Table 3

Pharmacokinetic parameters for droxidopa, norepinephrine, and 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine with droxidopa TID dosing (three 100-mg capsules every 4 h)

Variable	Droxidopa	Norepinephrine	3-Methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine
Dose 1
Mean (SD) Cmax	3113 (1279) ng/mL	895 (245) pg/mL	479 (158) ng/mL
Median (range) tmax, h	2.00 (1.00–4.00)	3.00 (0.00–4.00)	4.00 (4.00–4.00)
Dose 2
Mean (SD) Cmax	3389 (1046) ng/mL	840 (165) pg/mL	896 (219) ng/mL
Median (range) tmax, h	2.00 (1.50–3.00)	1.75 (0.00–4.05)	4.00 (3.00–4.03)
Dose 3
Mean (SD) Cmax	2789 (808) ng/mL	802 (160) pg/mL	1122 (286) ng/mL
Median (range) tmax, h	2.0 (1.50–3.0)	3.0 (0.00–16.0)	3.5 (2.0–6.2)
Mean (SD) AUC	31,648 (8569) h × ng/mL	15,601 (3281) h × pg/mL	16,971 (4670) h × ng/mL
Mean (SD) t½e, h	2.45 (0.15)	NA	6.01 (1.04)

AUC area under the plasma concentration–time curve to the final sample with a concentration ≥ lower limit of quantification, C peak plasma concentration, NA not applicable, SD standard deviation, t½e elimination half-life, TID 3 times daily, t time to maximum plasma concentration

Following the first dose of droxidopa, the Cmax of norepinephrine was 895 pg/mL; no further increases were observed with subsequent doses (Table 3). Norepinephrine levels remained above baseline for 12–16 h after the initial dose (Fig. 4b).

The mean plasma concentrations of 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine steadily increased after administration of the three doses of droxidopa (Fig. 4c). The Cmax of 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine was 479, 896, and 1122 ng/mL after the first, second, and third doses of droxidopa, respectively. These findings are consistent with the mean t½e of 6.0 h (Table 3).

Safety

Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in seven subjects (29%; Table 4). TEAE rates were similar in parts 1 and 2. All TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. No deaths, serious AEs, or discontinuations due to an AE occurred in the study. A transient mean (SD) maximum increase from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP was similar with all three dosing regimens [range 23.7–26.7 (12.0–12.6) mmHg and 9.6–13.5 (6.2–7.0) mmHg, respectively]; this pharmacodynamic effect is consistent with the observed pharmacokinetic profile (i.e., maximum BP increases generally coinciding with tmax). For most subjects (21/24), systolic BP remained < 150 mmHg, and the BP changes were considered clinically nonsignificant. In three subjects, transient systolic BP excursions (179, 181, and 185 mmHg) were reported as TEAEs. In one of these subjects, the systolic BP excursion was measured at the pretreatment assessment before the TID dosing phase (part 2), which was after a 7-day washout period from part 1 dosing. Other than these BP excursions and symptoms listed in Table 4, no other clinically significant treatment-emergent changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory, physical examination, or electrocardiogram findings were noted.

Table 4

Treatment-emergent adverse events

Case	Treatment arm	Preferred term (severity)
1	Single dose, fasted	Systolic blood pressure increased (mild)
2	TID	Dyspepsia (mild) Systolic blood pressure increased (mild)a
3	Single dose, fedb	Rash (mild)
4	Single dose, fedb	Sinus headache (moderate) Pruritus (mild)
5	TID	Peripheral edema (mild)
6	Single dose, fasted	Systolic blood pressure increased (mild)c
7	Single dose, fedb	Nausea (mild) Vomiting (moderate) Balance disorder (mild) Fall (mild) Asthenia (mild) Decreased appetite (mild) Headache (moderate)

TID 3 times daily

a2 occurrences during treatment

bHigh-fat, high-calorie meal

cOccurred before TID dosing

Discussion

A high-fat, high-calorie meal slowed absorption of a single 300-mg dose of droxidopa, resulting in a twofold increase in median tmax, a 34% decrease in mean Cmax, and a 20% decrease in mean AUC compared with fasted administration. The magnitude and onset of hemodynamic response associated with droxidopa appears to correlate with Cmax and tmax, respectively (rather than AUC) [10]. Therefore, administration of droxidopa with a high-fat, high-calorie meal may result in a decreased hemodynamic response. Minimal changes in the dose-to-dose plasma concentration of droxidopa were observed with TID administration. Because these findings suggest that there is a food effect on the absorption of droxidopa, it is recommended that patients always take droxidopa in the same manner, either with or without food for consistency of effects. In the phase 3 clinical trials of droxidopa, food intake was not controlled.

The pharmacokinetic parameters identified in this study of healthy subjects are generally consistent with findings from earlier pharmacokinetic studies of droxidopa performed in nOH populations. The droxidopa t½e values found in this study (2.5–2.7 h in single or TID dosing regimens) are similar to values reported in a single-dose (400-mg) study in patients with nOH associated with pure autonomic failure or MSA (2.3–2.7 h) [9]. The droxidopa Cmax and tmax values reported in this study are consistent with values previously reported. In two previous studies, a Cmax of approximately 1900 ng/mL and tmax of approximately 3 h have been reported after single-dose administration of droxidopa (400 mg); in one study, droxidopa was administered 1 h after a standard breakfast [10]; in the other study, the timing of administration of droxidopa with regard to meals was not reported [9].

To the best of our knowledge, no previous published studies have reported on the systemic pharmacokinetic disposition of the droxidopa major metabolite, 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine, in human subjects. In the current study, 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine levels steadily increased after administration of the three doses of droxidopa. Although the clinical significance of this accumulation of 3-methoxylated dihydroxyphenylserine remains unknown, toxicology and safety pharmacology studies have not identified pharmacologic activity associated with this metabolite [12].

In the current study, the healthy elderly subjects had baseline venous plasma norepinephrine levels [mean (SD), 577 (220) pg/mL] within the normal physiologic range (reference range 70–1700 pg/mL depending on postural position) [13], and mean norepinephrine levels remained within the normal physiologic range (i.e., < 900 pg/mL) during droxidopa administration every 4 h. Although there was no nOH comparative group in this study, patients with nOH associated with MSA and Parkinson disease have physiologic venous plasma norepinephrine levels similar to those of healthy controls [14, 15].

Further, the healthy elderly subjects who received 300 mg of droxidopa every 4 h had maximal venous plasma norepinephrine concentrations (in the semi-recumbent position) of 802–895 pg/mL. These values are consistent with reported maximal venous plasma norepinephrine values between 1184 and 1250 pg/mL after a single 400-mg dose of droxidopa in patients with nOH (due to pure autonomic failure or MSA) [9, 10]. In the current study, the tmax of norepinephrine was approximately 1.75–3 h after each dose of droxidopa, despite some differences in the administration of each dose with respect to timing of meals (i.e., the first dose was administered after an overnight fast, and the second and third doses were each administered 2 h after a meal). This tmax range for norepinephrine is similar to the 3-h tmax reported after droxidopa administration in MSA patients with nOH (unknown timing of food ingestion with droxidopa dosing) [9].

Taken together, the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic findings from this study are likely applicable to the nOH population and support the dosage and administration recommendations for droxidopa in the management of nOH [4]. Titration of droxidopa to symptomatic response is suggested because patients with nOH resulting from a variety of underlying autonomic failure conditions may require different maintenance doses of droxidopa based on endogenous norepinephrine levels (associated with type of neurodegeneration). A starting droxidopa dosage of 100 mg TID is suggested, which may be increased to the maximally recommended dosage of 600 mg TID. The findings of the current study suggest that a 300-mg TID dosing regimen does not lead to droxidopa accumulation and is associated with minimal fluctuations in norepinephrine levels.

Although this study was not designed to correlate plasma droxidopa or norepinephrine levels with hemodynamic changes, BP has been shown to rise in parallel with an increase in venous plasma norepinephrine level, with the peak BP increase preceding the peak increase in norepinephrine level [10]. Pharmacodynamically, an elevation in norepinephrine levels at night may blunt physiologic nocturnal BP dipping via mitigation of peripheral vasodilatation/increased systemic resistance and result in supine hypertension. Given that patients with nOH have circadian BP abnormalities, either as blunted nocturnal dipping or reversal of the normal circadian rhythm with higher BP values at night compared with the day, the potential effect of increased plasma norepinephrine levels must be considered [16].

However, plasma norepinephrine levels alone do not predict the occurrence of supine hypertension. The mechanism for supine hypertension in nOH is unclear, but appears complex and multifactorial. Various associated factors include increased vascular resistance [17, 18], elevated plasma angiotensin II levels [19], and inappropriate mineralocorticoid receptor activation [20]. In a study of patients with longstanding supine hypertension and OH, supine resting venous plasma norepinephrine levels were in the normal range, and systemic vascular resistance (not norepinephrine levels) was associated with supine hypertension [18]. In an investigation using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, patients with nOH treated with droxidopa [mean dosage (SD) 444 (129) mg TID] experienced a nonstatistically significant increase in nocturnal mean systolic BP [7.8 (4.8) mmHg; P = 0.122] compared with baseline [16]. At baseline, mean nocturnal systolic BP values ≥ 160, ≥ 180, and ≥ 200 mmHg were observed in 22, 11, and 0% of all patients, respectively; the percentages of patients with nocturnal systolic BP readings above these thresholds were similar at baseline and after a minimum of 4 weeks of droxidopa treatment [16].

In the current study, the tmax of norepinephrine was approximately 1.75–3 h after each dose of droxidopa. To maximize clinical benefit (i.e., induction of pressor effects when a patient is expected to be upright and active) and minimize risk of nocturnal supine hypertension, it is recommended that the first dose of droxidopa be taken in the morning (upon awaking) and the second dose taken midday, with the final dose taken in the late afternoon (at least 3 h before bedtime to avoid peak vasoconstrictor effects in parallel with tmax of norepinephrine).

Limitations associated with the current study include that it was conducted in healthy elderly subjects and not in patients with nOH. Although the mean age of the subject population was typical of patients with nOH [21, 22], other factors that may affect the pharmacokinetic findings, such as comorbid conditions or polypharmacy, were not evaluated in this study [e.g., effect of concomitant use of DDC inhibitors (e.g., carbidopa) or COMT inhibitors (e.g., entacapone)]. Because of the role of DDC and COMT in the metabolism of droxidopa (Fig. 1), administration of DDC or COMT inhibitors with droxidopa could alter pharmacokinetics and resultant pharmacodynamic and clinical effects. Studies have shown blunted BP responses and reduced norepinephrine levels when droxidopa is coadministered with carbidopa [10, 23]; however, those studies involved coadministration with a single carbidopa dose (200 mg) much greater than that used in standard-of-care clinical practice. No significant differences in the pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa or norepinephrine were observed when droxidopa was coadministered with single-dose entacapone (200 mg) compared with droxidopa alone [23]. Integrated clinical trial data suggest that patients using a DDC inhibitor have significant improvements in orthostatic dizziness/lightheadedness symptoms (the cardinal symptom of nOH), although the magnitude of the response was less when compared with non-DDC inhibitor users [24]. Thus, concomitant use of droxidopa with a DDC inhibitor may require dose adjustments. During the randomized treatment period, supine hypertension rates were similar in patients with and without concomitant DDC inhibitor use.

A further limitation of this study is that a gender subgroup analysis was not conducted for the pharmacokinetics of droxidopa. Significant sex differences in pharmacokinetics are well established [25], including for AUC of levodopa [26]. Consideration of sex differences between patients, particularly body weight differences, is thus advisable when prescribing droxidopa.

Conclusions

In summary, a high-fat, high-calorie meal slowed absorption of a single 300-mg dose of droxidopa, resulting in increased tmax, decreased Cmax and AUC, but similar t½e. With TID administration, changes in the plasma concentration of droxidopa were minimal from dose to dose, and venous plasma norepinephrine levels were increased from baseline for 12–16 h after the first dose. The pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g., tmax, Cmax, and t½e) of droxidopa after single and TID dosing were similar.

The pharmacokinetic profile of droxidopa was studied in healthy elderly volunteers.

Food effects were examined in a single-dose administration study, and the pharmacokinetic profiles of droxidopa and key metabolites associated with multiple daily dosing were determined.

Findings suggest that the absorption of a single dose of droxidopa is slowed after a high-fat/high-calorie meal [including an average 20% decrease in area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) versus patients taking droxidopa under fasted conditions] and that the pharmacokinetic parameters of droxidopa are similar after single and 3-times-daily dosing.