Literature DB >> 29392510

The use of SLICC and ACR criteria to correctly label patients with cutaneous lupus and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Aoibheann Flynn1, Eimear Gilhooley2, Finbar O'Shea3, Bairbre Wynne2.   

Abstract

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for lupus and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria are designed to classify disease. However, they have become widely used as diagnostic criteria in clinical situations. Patients may be labelled as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in their medical records, when in fact they have cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) without systemic symptoms. We sought to investigate how many of our cutaneous lupus patients attending a dermatology lupus clinic were mislabelled as either CLE or SLE using the ACR and SLICC criteria. Thirty-six patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous lupus were identified. Fourteen (39%) of the patients were labelled as 'SLE' in their medical notes, either by dermatology or another medical team. Of these 14 patients, 12 (86%) fulfilled the ACR and SLICC criteria; however, two (14%) did not meet the criteria for SLE. Of the remaining 22 patients who were not labelled as having SLE, four (18%) met both the SLICC and ACR criteria, one (5%) met the ACR criteria and one (5%) met the SLICC criteria. These patients had a history of discoid or subacute lupus, with very few systemic symptoms. They met the criteria for SLE primarily on their cutaneous signs and positive serology. It is important to screen patients with CLE routinely for SLE. Although the ACR and SLICC criteria can be helpful as they have a high sensitivity for systemic lupus, their use needs to be paired with the clinical context and patient evolution. We found patients were labelled as SLE when in fact they had no evidence of systemic involvement, as well as patients labelled as cutaneous lupus who fulfilled the criteria for SLE, although unlikely having any systemic involvement. It is important to correctly identify patients as 'cutaneous lupus' or 'systemic lupus erythematosus' and documentation in clinical notes should be accurate to avoid confusion and allow appropriate treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Rheumatology classification criteria; Cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29392510     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-3999-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

Review 1.  Determining risk factors for developing systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with discoid lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  B F Chong; J Song; N J Olsen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria to determine the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).

Authors:  Janice Tiao; Rui Feng; Kasey Carr; Joyce Okawa; Victoria P Werth
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Michelle Petri; Ana-Maria Orbai; Graciela S Alarcón; Caroline Gordon; Joan T Merrill; Paul R Fortin; Ian N Bruce; David Isenberg; Daniel J Wallace; Ola Nived; Gunnar Sturfelt; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Sang-Cheol Bae; John G Hanly; Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero; Ann Clarke; Cynthia Aranow; Susan Manzi; Murray Urowitz; Dafna Gladman; Kenneth Kalunian; Melissa Costner; Victoria P Werth; Asad Zoma; Sasha Bernatsky; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Munther A Khamashta; Soren Jacobsen; Jill P Buyon; Peter Maddison; Mary Anne Dooley; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Ellen Ginzler; Thomas Stoll; Christine Peschken; Joseph L Jorizzo; Jeffrey P Callen; S Sam Lim; Barri J Fessler; Murat Inanc; Diane L Kamen; Anisur Rahman; Kristjan Steinsson; Andrew G Franks; Lisa Sigler; Suhail Hameed; Hong Fang; Ngoc Pham; Robin Brey; Michael H Weisman; Gerald McGwin; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical review.

Authors:  Cong Yu; M Eric Gershwin; Christopher Chang
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 7.094

Review 5.  Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  L G Okon; V P Werth
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Redefining cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a proposed international consensus approach and results of a preliminary questionnaire.

Authors:  J F Merola; F Nyberg; F Furukawa; M J Goodfield; M Hasegawa; B Marinovic; J Szepietowski; J Dutz; V P Werth
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-26

7.  Dialogue: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a lone Wolf?

Authors:  Andrew G Franks; Antonio Guilabert
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2015-04-01
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary care in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized controlled trial in China.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Shikai Geng; Liping Qian; Shuang Ye; Xiaodong Wang; Guohong Lu; Yang Ding; Ting Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-06-25

2.  Lack of patient education is risk factor of disease flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in China.

Authors:  Le Zhang; Wei Luan; Shikai Geng; Shuang Ye; Xiaodong Wang; Liping Qian; Yang Ding; Ting Li; Anli Jiang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.