OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate possible ototoxicity associated with topical rifamycin application via electrophysiological tests and ultrastructural examinations. METHODS: Electrophysiological assessment was performed with tympanometry, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements. This study was conducted on 40 ears of 20 guinea pigs that were detected to have normal hearing thresholds. The animals were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (n=12) received 0.1 mL rifamycin, Group 2 (n=8) received 0.1 ml gentamycin, and Group 3 (n=20) received 0.1 mL physiological saline. The antibiotics and saline solutions were administered via intratympanic injections. After five injections every other day, electrophysiological tests were performed again on the 15th day. After electrophysiological measurements, the temporal bones of all guinea pigs were prepared for ultrastructural examinations and the cochlear surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The animals in group 3 did not show a statistically significant change in their DPOAE signal/noise ratio (SNR) or ABR thresholds (p>0.05). In groups 1 and 2, the reduction in the DPOAE SNR and the increase in the ABR threshold were statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding SEM examination results, the animals in groups 1 and 2 showed statistically significant outer hair cell damage and cochlear degeneration due to the ototoxic effect of the drugs (p<0.05), whereas the animals in group 3 showed no significant damage (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that rifamycin application to the middle ears of guinea pigs has mild ototoxic effects on their inner ears.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate possible ototoxicity associated with topical rifamycin application via electrophysiological tests and ultrastructural examinations. METHODS: Electrophysiological assessment was performed with tympanometry, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements. This study was conducted on 40 ears of 20 guinea pigs that were detected to have normal hearing thresholds. The animals were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (n=12) received 0.1 mL rifamycin, Group 2 (n=8) received 0.1 ml gentamycin, and Group 3 (n=20) received 0.1 mL physiological saline. The antibiotics and saline solutions were administered via intratympanic injections. After five injections every other day, electrophysiological tests were performed again on the 15th day. After electrophysiological measurements, the temporal bones of all guinea pigs were prepared for ultrastructural examinations and the cochlear surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: The animals in group 3 did not show a statistically significant change in their DPOAE signal/noise ratio (SNR) or ABR thresholds (p>0.05). In groups 1 and 2, the reduction in the DPOAE SNR and the increase in the ABR threshold were statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding SEM examination results, the animals in groups 1 and 2 showed statistically significant outer hair cell damage and cochlear degeneration due to the ototoxic effect of the drugs (p<0.05), whereas the animals in group 3 showed no significant damage (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that rifamycin application to the middle ears of guinea pigs has mild ototoxic effects on their inner ears.
Authors: Peter S Roland; Leonard Rybak; Maureen Hannley; Greg Matz; Michael G Stewart; Spiros Manolidis; Rick Friedman; Peter Weber; Fred Owens Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Martin J Boeree; Norbert Heinrich; Rob Aarnoutse; Andreas H Diacon; Rodney Dawson; Sunita Rehal; Gibson S Kibiki; Gavin Churchyard; Ian Sanne; Nyanda E Ntinginya; Lilian T Minja; Robert D Hunt; Salome Charalambous; Madeleine Hanekom; Hadija H Semvua; Stellah G Mpagama; Christina Manyama; Bariki Mtafya; Klaus Reither; Robert S Wallis; Amour Venter; Kim Narunsky; Anka Mekota; Sonja Henne; Angela Colbers; Georgette Plemper van Balen; Stephen H Gillespie; Patrick P J Phillips; Michael Hoelscher Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 25.071