Literature DB >> 29391971

Titanium versus Hydroxyapatite Prostheses: Comparison of Hearing and Anatomical Outcomes after Ossicular Chain Reconstruction.

Emre Ocak1, Süha Beton1, Cem Meço1, Gürsel Dursun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare hearing and anatomical outcomes after ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium or hydroxyapatite prostheses.
METHODS: In this study, patients who underwent tympanoplasty and ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium or hydroxyapatite prostheses at a university hospital from January 2007 to February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed; they had a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the type of prostheses. The surgical procedure, follow-up examinations, preoperative, and postoperative audiometry results were noted and evaluated for partial and total prostheses. The results were compared both for titanium and hydroxyapatite prostheses.
RESULTS: The study subjects included 51 patients. Titanium had better hearing results in partial prostheses (p<0.05), while the anatomical outcomes were similar. Nevertheless, both types had similar results in total prostheses (p>0.05). The extrusion rate was 5.8% for all patients.
CONCLUSION: Both types of prostheses had satisfactory functional and anatomical results and no preponderance could be stated, except for the hearing results of partial titanium prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Titanium; hydroxyapatite; ossicular chain reconstruction; prosthesis

Year:  2015        PMID: 29391971      PMCID: PMC5791801          DOI: 10.5152/tao.2015.775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 2667-7466


  21 in total

1.  Ossicular chain reconstruction.

Authors:  M E Glasscock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses.

Authors:  Sébastien Schmerber; Joelle Troussier; Georges Dumas; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Dinh-qui Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiqian Yu; Yingzi He; Yusu Ni; Yunfeng Wang; Na Lu; Huawei Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Early results with titanium ossicular implants.

Authors:  Steven Y Ho; Robert A Battista; Richard J Wiet
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic as middle ear implant material: animal experimental results.

Authors:  J J Grote; C A van Blitterswijk; W Kuijpers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr

6.  [Three years of experience with titanium implants in the middle ear].

Authors:  C H Stupp; C Dalchow; D Grün; H F Stupp; J Wustrow
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.057

Review 7.  [Passive and active middle ear implants].

Authors:  D Beutner; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  Tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy: canal wall up procedures.

Authors:  D E Brackmann
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-07

9.  Titanium as a biomaterial for ossicular replacement: results after implantation in the middle ear of the rabbit.

Authors:  K Schwager
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Results of cavity reconstruction with hydroxyapatite implants after 15 years.

Authors:  J J Grote
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Biocompatible Nanocomposite Implant with Silver Nanoparticles for Otology-In Vivo Evaluation.

Authors:  Magdalena Ziąbka; Elżbieta Menaszek; Jacek Tarasiuk; Sebastian Wroński
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 2.  Biocompatible Materials in Otorhinolaryngology and Their Antibacterial Properties.

Authors:  Jakub Spałek; Przemysław Ociepa; Piotr Deptuła; Ewelina Piktel; Tamara Daniluk; Grzegorz Król; Stanisław Góźdź; Robert Bucki; Sławomir Okła
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.