Literature DB >> 29391676

Comparison of Cervical Length Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Bishop Score in Predicting Response to Labor Induction.

Ronak Khandelwal1, Purvi Patel2, Dipa Pitre2, Tosha Sheth2, Nandita Maitra2.   

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the value of the Bishop score and cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting active labor within 6 h, induction-to-delivery interval, and the duration of active labor and to estimate the most useful cutoff points for the two methods.
Methods: This is a prospective comparative study of Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal sonography on 62 nulliparous subjects who underwent induction of labor.
Results: The Bishop score of the subjects ranged from two to seven (2-7). The mean Bishop in this study population was 4.37 + 1.23. The mean cervical length in this study was 25.59 + 6.07. Bishop score was highly significant (P value < 0.0001) in predicting active phase of labor as compared to cervical length (P = 0.004). The best cutoff value for Bishop score to predict induction of labor within 6 h was more than 4 with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 79%. Similarly, best cutoff value for cervical length to predict induction of labor within 6 h was less than or equal to 25 mm with sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 70%. Bishop score was more significant (P = 0.001) in predicting induction-to-delivery interval within 12 h as compared to cervical length (P = 0.01).
Conclusion: The Bishop score was superior in predicting the response to induction as compared to the cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bishop score; Induction active phase interval; Labor induction; Transvaginal cervical length

Year:  2017        PMID: 29391676      PMCID: PMC5783898          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-017-1027-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.

Authors:  G K Pandis; A T Papageorghiou; V G Ramanathan; M O Thompson; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.

Authors:  K H Park; S N Kim; S Y Lee; E H Jeong; H J Jung; K J Oh
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

Authors:  M Kehila; I Bougmiza; R Ben Hmid; W Abdelfatteh; S Mahjoub; M B Channoufi
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2015-05-12

4.  Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.

Authors:  Fatemeh Bahadori; Hale Ayatollahi; Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad; Hamidreza Khalkhali; Zilla Naseri
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor.

Authors:  Parvin Bastani; Kobra Hamdi; Fatemeh Abasalizadeh; Parisa Pourmousa; Fatemeh Ghatrehsamani
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-12

Review 6.  Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Ahizechukwu C Eke; George U Eleje; Chukwuemeka E Nwachukwu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-12
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Birthing ball on promoting cervical ripening and its influence on the labor process and the neonatal blood gas index.

Authors:  Hai-Chuan Shen; Huan Wang; Bo Sun; Lan-Zhi Jiang; Qian Meng
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.