Priya Sinha1, Amita Suneja1, Kiran Guleria1, Richa Aggarwal1,2, Neelam B Vaid1. 1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, 110095 India. 2. KL-99, Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh India.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone followed by misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the management of early pregnancy failure (EPF). Study Design: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Methods:Ninety-two women with EPF ≤12 weeks were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either mifepristone 200 mg (n = 46) or placebo (n = 46). Forty-eight hours later, patients in both the groups were given 800 µg misoprostol per-vaginum. If no expulsion occurred within 4 h, repeat doses of 400 µg misoprostol were given orally at 3-hourly interval to a maximum of 2 doses in women ≤9 weeks by scan and 4 doses in women >9 weeks by scan. Results: Pre-treatment of misoprostol with mifepristone significantly increased the complete abortion rate (86.7 vs. 57.8%, p = 0.009) and, hence, reduced the need for surgical evacuation (13.3 vs. 42.2%, p = 0.002), induction to expulsion interval (4.74 ± 2.24 vs. 8.03 ± 2.77 h, p = 0.000), mean number of additional doses of misoprostol required (0.68 vs. 1.91, p = 0.000), and side effects. Conclusion: Use of mifepristone prior to misoprostol in EPF significantly improves the efficacy and reduces the side effects of misoprostol alone.
RCT Entities:
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone followed by misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the management of early pregnancy failure (EPF). Study Design: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Methods: Ninety-two women with EPF ≤12 weeks were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either mifepristone 200 mg (n = 46) or placebo (n = 46). Forty-eight hours later, patients in both the groups were given 800 µg misoprostol per-vaginum. If no expulsion occurred within 4 h, repeat doses of 400 µg misoprostol were given orally at 3-hourly interval to a maximum of 2 doses in women ≤9 weeks by scan and 4 doses in women >9 weeks by scan. Results: Pre-treatment of misoprostol with mifepristone significantly increased the complete abortion rate (86.7 vs. 57.8%, p = 0.009) and, hence, reduced the need for surgical evacuation (13.3 vs. 42.2%, p = 0.002), induction to expulsion interval (4.74 ± 2.24 vs. 8.03 ± 2.77 h, p = 0.000), mean number of additional doses of misoprostol required (0.68 vs. 1.91, p = 0.000), and side effects. Conclusion: Use of mifepristone prior to misoprostol in EPF significantly improves the efficacy and reduces the side effects of misoprostol alone.
Entities:
Keywords:
Early pregnancy failure; Mifepristone; Misoprostol
Authors: Joyce van den Berg; Johan M van den Bent; Marcus P Snijders; Roel de Heus; Sjors F Coppus; Frank P Vandenbussche Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Valeria Colleselli; Courtney A Schreiber; Elisabeth D'Costa; Stephanie Mangesius; Ludwig Wildt; Beata E Seeber Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Marike Lemmers; Marianne Ac Verschoor; Bobae Veronica Kim; Martha Hickey; Juan C Vazquez; Ben Willem J Mol; James P Neilson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-17
Authors: Charlotte Hamel; Sjors Coppus; Joyce van den Berg; Esther Hink; Jacoba van Seeters; Paul van Kesteren; Ashley Merién; Bas Torrenga; Rafli van de Laar; Josien Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Ingrid Gaugler-Senden; Peppino Graziosi; Minouche van Rumste; Ewka Nelissen; Frank Vandenbussche; Marcus Snijders Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Jay Ghosh; Argyro Papadopoulou; Adam J Devall; Hannah C Jeffery; Leanne E Beeson; Vivian Do; Malcolm J Price; Aurelio Tobias; Özge Tunçalp; Antonella Lavelanet; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Arri Coomarasamy; Ioannis D Gallos Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-06-01
Authors: Libei Du; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Yan Hong Du; Li Zhang; Wei Yu Diao; Pak Chung Ho Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 2.692