Literature DB >> 29391335

Use of Plerixafor to Mobilize a Healthy Donor Infected with Influenza A.

Mahmut Yeral1, Pelin Aytan1, Can Boğa1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Influenza A Healthy donor.; Plerixafor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29391335      PMCID: PMC5972339          DOI: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Haematol        ISSN: 1300-7777            Impact factor:   1.831


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, The combined use of plerixafor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves mobilization in poor mobilizers. However, there are limited data available on the use of plerixafor in healthy donors [1,2]. The effects of influenza A infection on stem cell mobilization are not known. A 46-year-old male was selected as an HLA-matched donor for a patient diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Donor assessment was performed in accordance with the standard operating procedure prepared for JACIE (SOP: BMT-CU-006, Donor Assessment and Safety). The donor was given 10 mg/kg/day G-CSF. He developed a dry persistent cough, chills, fever of 39 °C, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms on day 3 of G-CSF administration. The donor was considered to have an upper respiratory tract infection, which could not be attributed to only G-CSF administration. The family members of the donor were found to have similar symptoms. Thus, blood and urine cultures were obtained and he was started on levofloxacin in addition to paracetamol; G-CSF was continued. A respiratory tract virus panel was performed on a nasal smear using a PCR-based technique. The peripheral blood leukocyte count was 22,000/µL but CD34+ cells represented just 0.07% of all cells (11/µL) on day 5 of G-CSF administration; this was considered to reflect “poor mobilization”. Therefore, 0.24 mg/kg plerixafor was administered “just in time,” in addition to G-CSF, on night 5, after the donor had been given all necessary information and informed consent had been obtained. Two hours after the 11th dose of G-CSF, the leukocyte count was 45,000/µL, of which 0.33% (148/µL) were CD34+ cells. Peripheral stem cell apheresis was performed using the Donor Spectra Optia Apheresis System (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA). A total of 15.20x108 nuclear cells/kg were collected. The product contained 3.92x106 CD34+ cells/kg, 14.91x107 CD3+ cells/kg, 17.36x107 CD19+ cells/kg, and 7.17x107 CD56+ cells/kg. G-CSF was discontinued after an adequate number of stem cells had been collected, but the fever persisted. Oseltamivir at 150 mg twice daily was then prescribed for the donor because the respiratory tract virus panel examination revealed influenza A infection. The fever became controlled 24 h after oseltamivir administration. The plerixafor procedure was considered to have permitted “sufficient mobilization” in a healthy donor who could not be mobilized with G-CSF probably because of his influenza infection. Many factors including age, sex, body mass index, baseline leukocyte count, and comorbid conditions may compromise mobilization [3]. Although certain viral infections may cause poor mobilization, data on the influence of influenza in this context are rather limited [4]. Cytokine production or cytokine storm developing during influenza infection may be presumed to impair stem cell mobilization [5]. A combination of G-CSF and plerixafor can be used to treat mobilization failure and is usually well tolerated [6,7]. The only option upon stem cell mobilization failure with G-CSF is bone marrow harvesting. Our donor was given plerixafor “just in time”; he had an active infection and did not consent to bone marrow harvesting. While plerixafor is usually used for mobilization in lymphoma or myeloma patients, literature data are available about its use in allogeneic settings [8]. Stem cells in numbers adequate for safe transplantation were collected in a single procedure. This report indicates that influenza A may suppress the hematopoietic system, negatively affecting stem cell mobilization. The problem may be overcome by plerixafor administration.
  8 in total

1.  Prophylactic oseltamivir treatment for prevention of donor-recipient influenza A H1N1 virus transmission does not compromise stem cell mobilization or engraftment.

Authors:  A Rohn; H H Kessler; T Valentin; W Linkesch; P Neumeister
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Plerixafor on demand in ten healthy family donors as a rescue strategy to achieve an adequate graft for stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Salvatore Gattillo; Sarah Marktel; Lorenzo Rizzo; Simona Malato; Lucia Malabarba; Milena Coppola; Andrea Assanelli; Raffaella Milani; Tiago De Freitas; Consuelo Corti; Laura Bellio; Fabio Ciceri
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  G-CSF in Healthy Allogeneic Stem Cell Donors.

Authors:  Kristina Hölig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Partial engraftment following plerixafor rescue after failed sibling donor peripheral blood stem cell harvest.

Authors:  Toby A Eyre; Andrew J King; Andrew Peniket; Vanderson Rocha; Graham P Collins; Rachel Pawson
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Mapping the innate signaling cascade essential for cytokine storm during influenza virus infection.

Authors:  John R Teijaro; Kevin B Walsh; Stephanie Rice; Hugh Rosen; Michael B A Oldstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The use of AMD3100 plus G-CSF for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization is superior to G-CSF alone.

Authors:  Neal Flomenberg; Steven M Devine; John F Dipersio; Jane L Liesveld; John M McCarty; Scott D Rowley; David H Vesole; Karin Badel; Gary Calandra
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Management of mobilization failure in 2017.

Authors:  Sinem Namdaroglu; Serdal Korkmaz; Fevzi Altuntas
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  Addition of plerixafor for CD34+ cell mobilization in six healthy stem cell donors ensured satisfactory grafts for transplantation.

Authors:  Anne Werner Hauge; Eva Kannik Haastrup; Henrik Sengeløv; Lia Minulescu; Ebbe Dickmeiss; Anne Fischer-Nielsen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.157

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update.

Authors:  Yavuz M Bilgin
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2021-06-02

2.  Influenza A Infection and Stem Cell Mobilization.

Authors:  Sora Yasri; Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.831

3.  Addition of plerixafor in poorly mobilized allogeneic stem cell donors.

Authors:  Lefan Zhuang; Deisen Lauro; Shirong Wang; Shan Yuan
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.605

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.