Literature DB >> 29391281

Appendicitis Grade, Operative Duration, and Hospital Cost.

Courtney M Collins1, Daniel L Davenport2, Cynthia L Talley2, Andrew C Bernard2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) established a grading system for appendicitis to allow prediction of risk and outcomes, to assist in quality improvement and resource management, and to provide a framework for research. Grading is determined in clinical, imaging, operative, and pathologic categories, but has not been completely validated. Our aim was to validate appendicitis grade with respect to duration of symptoms, operative duration, and hospital costs. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective medical record review, working backward until at least 40 of each grade of appendicitis were reviewed. Patients 8 years old and younger and those treated nonoperatively were excluded. Appendicitis severity was determined using the AAST grading scale (I to V), with V being the most severe. Statistical comparisons were made between increased grade and duration of symptoms, operative duration, hospital costs, and revenue. Data were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square tests as appropriate.
RESULTS: A total of 1,099 appendectomies performed between August 2013 and December 2016 were analyzed. Most were low grade. Median age was 18 years old, and 44.4% were female. Patients with increasing AAST grade had a longer symptom duration (p < 0.001), longer operative duration (p < 0.001), increased direct costs (p < 0.001) in every category measured (operating room, pharmacy, imaging, lab), and contribution margin (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The AAST appendicitis grade is a valid predictor of disease severity as defined by operative duration, hospital cost, and revenue. Duration of symptoms predicts severity. Appendicitis grade can be used in clinical care, residency training, and resource allocation.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29391281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Reduced Opioid Prescription Practices and Duration of Stay after TAP Block for Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Eric J Finnesgard; Johnathon M Aho; Martin D Zielinski; Henry J Schiller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Bundled Payments for Appendectomy: a Model of Financial Implications to Institutions.

Authors:  Udai S Sibia; Ayolola O Onayemi; Justin J Turcotte; John R Klune; Jennifer Wormuth; Brooke M Buckley
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Implementing a surgeon-reported categorization of pediatric appendicitis severity.

Authors:  Katherine J Baxter; Heather L Short; Curtis D Travers; Kurt F Heiss; Mehul V Raval
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Ceftriaxone plus Metronidazole versus Anti-Pseudomonal Antibiotics for Perforated Appendicitis in Children.

Authors:  Rana F Hamdy; Lori K Handy; Evangelos Spyridakis; Daniele Dona; Matthew Bryan; Joy L Collins; Jeffrey S Gerber
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Time is money: quantifying savings in outpatient appendectomy.

Authors:  Elise Taylor Bernard; Daniel L Davenport; Courtney M Collins; Bethany A Benton; Andrew C Bernard
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-12-30

6.  The necessity of abdominal drainage for patients with complicated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu-Tso Liao; John Huang; Chia-Tung Wu; Pei-Chen Chen; Tsung-Ting Hsieh; Feipei Lai; Tzu-Chun Chen; Jin-Tung Liang
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.