Artak Tovmasyan1, Jacqueline C Bueno-Janice1, Melba C Jaramillo2, Romulo S Sampaio1, Julio S Reboucas3, Natalia Kyui4, Ludmil Benov5, Brian Deng6,7, Ting-Ting Huang7,8, Margaret E Tome9, Ivan Spasojevic10,11, Ines Batinic-Haberle1. 1. 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina. 2. 2 Department of Pathology, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona. 3. 3 Departamento de Quimica, CCEN , Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Brazil . 4. 4 Canadian Economic Analysis Department , Bank of Canada, Ottawa, Canada . 5. 5 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University , Kuwait, Kuwait . 6. 6 Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research , Palo Alto, California. 7. 7 Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California. 8. 8 Geriatric Research. Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) , VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. 9. 9 Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona. 10. 10 Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, North Carolina. 11. 11 PK/PD Core Laboratory, Pharmaceutical Research Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute , Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
AIMS: We aim here to demonstrate that radiation (RT) enhances tumor sensitization by only those Mn complexes that are redox active and cycle with ascorbate (Asc), thereby producing H2O2 and utilizing it subsequently in protein S-glutathionylation in a glutathione peroxidase (GPx)-like manner. In turn, such compounds affect cellular redox environment, described by glutathione disulfide (GSSG)/glutathione (GSH) ratio, and tumor growth. To achieve our goal, we tested several Mn complexes of different chemical and physical properties in cellular and animal flank models of 4T1 breast cancer cell. Four other cancer cell lines were used to substantiate key findings. RESULTS: Joint administration of cationic Mn porphyrin (MnP)-based redox active compounds, MnTE-2-PyP5+ or MnTnBuOE-2-PyP5+ with RT and Asc contributes to high H2O2 production in cancer cells and tumor, which along with high MnP accumulation in cancer cells and tumor induces the largest suppression of cell viability and tumor growth, while increasing GSSG/GSH ratio and levels of total S-glutathionylated proteins. Redox-inert MnP, MnTBAP3- and two other different types of redox-active Mn complexes (EUK-8 and M40403) were neither efficacious in the cellular nor in the animal model. Such outcome is in accordance with their inability to catalyze Asc oxidation and mimic GPx. INNOVATION: We provided here the first evidence how structure-activity relationship between the catalytic potency and the redox properties of Mn complexes controls their ability to impact cellular redox environment and thus enhance the radiation and ascorbate-mediated tumor suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The interplay between the accumulation of cationic MnPs and their potency as catalysts for oxidation of Asc, protein cysteines, and GSH controls the magnitude of their anticancer therapeutic effects.
AIMS: We aim here to demonstrate that radiation (RT) enhances tumor sensitization by only those Mn complexes that are redox active and cycle with ascorbate (Asc), thereby producing H2O2 and utilizing it subsequently in protein S-glutathionylation in a glutathione peroxidase (GPx)-like manner. In turn, such compounds affect cellular redox environment, described by glutathione disulfide (GSSG)/glutathione (GSH) ratio, and tumor growth. To achieve our goal, we tested several Mn complexes of different chemical and physical properties in cellular and animal flank models of 4T1 breast cancer cell. Four other cancer cell lines were used to substantiate key findings. RESULTS: Joint administration of cationic Mn porphyrin (MnP)-based redox active compounds, MnTE-2-PyP5+ or MnTnBuOE-2-PyP5+ with RT and Asc contributes to high H2O2 production in cancer cells and tumor, which along with high MnP accumulation in cancer cells and tumor induces the largest suppression of cell viability and tumor growth, while increasing GSSG/GSH ratio and levels of total S-glutathionylated proteins. Redox-inert MnP, MnTBAP3- and two other different types of redox-active Mn complexes (EUK-8 and M40403) were neither efficacious in the cellular nor in the animal model. Such outcome is in accordance with their inability to catalyze Asc oxidation and mimic GPx. INNOVATION: We provided here the first evidence how structure-activity relationship between the catalytic potency and the redox properties of Mn complexes controls their ability to impact cellular redox environment and thus enhance the radiation and ascorbate-mediated tumor suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The interplay between the accumulation of cationic MnPs and their potency as catalysts for oxidation of Asc, protein cysteines, and GSH controls the magnitude of their anticancer therapeutic effects.
Authors: Huaxin Sheng; Wei Yang; Shiro Fukuda; Hubert M Tse; Wulf Paschen; Kwame Johnson; Ines Batinic-Haberle; James D Crapo; Robert D Pearlstein; Jon Piganelli; David S Warner Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Xiaodong Ye; Diane Fels; Artak Tovmasyan; Katherine M Aird; Casey Dedeugd; Jennifer L Allensworth; Ivan Kos; Won Park; Ivan Spasojevic; Gayathri R Devi; Mark W Dewhirst; Kam W Leong; Ines Batinic-Haberle Journal: Free Radic Res Date: 2011-09-27
Authors: Tereza Moore; Anthony Le; Anna-Kaisa Niemi; Tony Kwan; Krinstina Cusmano-Ozog; Gregory M Enns; Tina M Cowan Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Douglas H Weitzel; Artak Tovmasyan; Kathleen A Ashcraft; Alina Boico; Samuel R Birer; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; James Herndon; Ramona M Rodriguiz; William C Wetsel; Katherine B Peters; Ivan Spasojevic; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Mark W Dewhirst Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Claire M Doskey; Visarut Buranasudja; Brett A Wagner; Justin G Wilkes; Juan Du; Joseph J Cullen; Garry R Buettner Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 11.799
Authors: Artak Tovmasyan; Huaxin Sheng; Tin Weitner; Amanda Arulpragasam; Miaomiao Lu; David S Warner; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Ivan Spasojevic; Ines Batinic-Haberle Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Mary-Keara Boss; Rebecca E Oberley-Deegan; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Geoffrey A Talmon; Jason A Somarelli; Shengnan Xu; Elizabeth A Kosmacek; Brandon Griess; Shakeel Mir; Shashank Shrishrimal; Melissa Teoh-Fitzgerald; Ivan Spasojevic; Mark W Dewhirst Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: John Mark Cline; Greg Dugan; John Daniel Bourland; Donna L Perry; Joel D Stitzel; Ashley A Weaver; Chen Jiang; Artak Tovmasyan; Kouros Owzar; Ivan Spasojevic; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Zeljko Vujaskovic Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2018-03-07
Authors: Anery Patel; Elizabeth A Kosmacek; Kurt W Fisher; Whitney Goldner; Rebecca E Oberley-Deegan Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Clarissa G C Maia; Bárbara C R de Araujo; Maria B de Freitas-Marques; Israel F da Costa; Maria Irene Yoshida; Wagner da Nova Mussel; Rita de Cássia O Sebastião; Júlio S Rebouças Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Kenneth R Olson; Yan Gao; Andrea K Steiger; Michael D Pluth; Charles R Tessier; Troy A Markel; David Boone; Robert V Stahelin; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Karl D Straubg Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 4.411