| Literature DB >> 29389896 |
Sharon May-Davis1, Wendy Y Brown2, Kathleen Shorter3, Zefanja Vermeulen4, Raquel Butler5, Marianne Koekkoek6.
Abstract
The Dutch Konik is valued from a genetic conservation perspective and also for its role in preservation of natural landscapes. The primary management objective for the captive breeding of this primitive horse is to maintain its genetic purity, whilst also maintaining the nature reserves on which they graze. Breeding selection has traditionally been based on phenotypic characteristics consistent with the breed description, and the selection of animals for removal from the breeding program is problematic at times due to high uniformity within the breed, particularly in height at the wither, colour (mouse to grey dun) and presence of primitive markings. With the objective of identifying an additional non-invasive selection criterion with potential uniqueness to the Dutch Konik, this study investigates the anatomic parameters of the distal equine limb, with a specific focus on the relative lengths of the individual splint bones. Post-mortem dissections performed on distal limbs of Dutch Konik (n = 47) and modern domesticated horses (n = 120) revealed significant differences in relation to the length and symmetry of the 2nd and 4th Metacarpals and Metatarsals. Distal limb characteristics with apparent uniqueness to the Dutch Konik are described which could be an important tool in the selection and preservation of the breed.Entities:
Keywords: Dutch Konik; Metacarpal; Metatarsal; Tarpan; primitive horse; splint bones
Year: 2018 PMID: 29389896 PMCID: PMC5836029 DOI: 10.3390/ani8020021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Wither height 130–140 cm (highest Thoracic dorsal spine) represented by the measurement from the ground to the black arrowhead in this Dutch Konik Stallion. Note: primitive stripes (white arrows).
Measuring techniques for mMC2, mMC4, mMT2 and mMT4.
| Descriptor | Measurement Description |
|---|---|
| mMC2 | On the caudomedial aspect, place the fixed caliper arm at the distal point of the nodule on MC2; then extend the movable caliper arm to the distal edge of the medial MC3 condyle. |
| mMC4 | On the caudolateral aspect, place the fixed caliper arm at the distal point of the nodule on MC4; then extend the movable caliper arm to the distal edge of the lateral MC3 condyle. |
| mMT2 | On the caudomedial aspect, place the fixed caliper arm at the distal point of the nodule on MT2; then extend the movable caliper arm to the distal edge of the medial MT3 condyle. |
| mMT4 | On the caudolateral aspect, place the fixed caliper arm at the distal point of the nodule on MT4; then extend the movable caliper arm to the distal edge of the lateral MT3 condyle. |
Figure 2The distal nodule of MC4 is easily visible in the right forelimb of this 5-year-old Thoroughbred (left). The photo on the right demonstrates the technique used for measuring the nodule to condyle distance, in this case of MC4 (mMC4).
Figure 3Variation in length and symmetry of the 2nd and 4th Metacarpals (MC) and Metatarsals (MT) between the Dutch Konik and Domesticate Horse, as indicated by their respective nodule to condyle measurements (mMC and mMT).