Literature DB >> 29389161

The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification.

Carolyn Semmler1, John Dunn2, Laura Mickes3, John T Wixted4.   

Abstract

Estimator variables are factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications but that are outside of the control of the criminal justice system. Examples include (1) the duration of exposure to the perpetrator, (2) the passage of time between the crime and the identification (retention interval), (3) the distance between the witness and the perpetrator at the time of the crime. Suboptimal estimator variables (e.g., long distance) have long been thought to reduce the reliability of eyewitness identifications (IDs), but recent evidence suggests that this is not true of IDs made with high confidence and may or may not be true of IDs made with lower confidence. The evidence suggests that though suboptimal estimator variables decrease discriminability (i.e., the ability to distinguish innocent from guilty suspects), they do not decrease the reliability of IDs made with high confidence. Such findings are inconsistent with the longstanding "optimality hypothesis" and therefore require a new theoretical framework. Here, we propose that a signal-detection-based likelihood ratio account-which has long been a mainstay of basic theories of recognition memory-naturally accounts for these findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389161     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  10 in total

1.  Lineup identification in young and older witnesses: does describing the criminal help or hinder?

Authors:  Juliet S Holdstock; Polly Dalton; Keith A May; Stewart Boogert; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Simulated viewing distance impairs the confidence-accuracy relationship for long, but not moderate distances: support for a model incorporating the role of feature ambiguity.

Authors:  Sara D Davis; Daniel J Peterson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  The relationship between confidence and accuracy with verbal and verbal + numeric confidence scales.

Authors:  Eylul Tekin; Wenbo Lin; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-11-07

4.  Postdictive confidence (but not predictive confidence) predicts eyewitness memory accuracy.

Authors:  Thao B Nguyen; Erica Abed; Kathy Pezdek
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-29

5.  Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.

Authors:  Curt A Carlson; Alyssa R Jones; Jane E Whittington; Robert F Lockamyeir; Maria A Carlson; Alex R Wooten
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

6.  Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Jeffrey J Starns; Caren M Rotello; Andrea M Cataldo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-13

7.  Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.

Authors:  Alice A Winsor; Heather D Flowe; Travis M Seale-Carlisle; Isabella M Killeen; Danielle Hett; Theo Jores; Madeleine Ingham; Byron P Lee; Laura M Stevens; Melissa F Colloff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-09-09

8.  Improving face identification of mask-wearing individuals.

Authors:  Krista D Manley; Jason C K Chan; Gary L Wells
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  How to make better forensic decisions.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.

Authors:  D P Morgan; J Tamminen; T M Seale-Carlisle; L Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.