Literature DB >> 29389073

A fungal mock community control for amplicon sequencing experiments.

Matthew G Bakker1.   

Abstract

Microbial ecology has been profoundly advanced by the ability to profile complex microbial communities by sequencing of marker genes amplified from environmental samples. However, inclusion of appropriate controls is vital to revealing the limitations and biases of this technique. "Mock community" samples, in which the composition and relative abundances of community members are known, are particularly valuable for guiding library preparation and data processing decisions. I generated a set of three mock communities using 19 different fungal taxa and demonstrate their utility by contrasting amplicon sequencing data obtained for the same communities under modifications to PCR conditions during library preparation. Increasing the number of PCR cycles elevated rates of chimera formation, and of errors in the final data set. Extension time during PCR had little impact on chimera formation, error rate or observed community structure. Polymerase fidelity impacted error rates significantly. Despite a high error rate, a master mix optimized to minimize amplification bias yielded profiles that were most similar to the true community structure. Bias against particular taxa differed among ITS1 vs. ITS2 loci. Preclustering nearly identical reads substantially reduced error rates, but did not improve similarity to the expected community structure. Inaccuracies in amplicon sequence-based estimates of fungal community structure were associated with amplification bias and size selection processes, as well as variable culling rates among reads from different taxa. In some cases, the numerically dominant taxon was completely absent from final data sets, highlighting the need for further methodological improvements to avoid biased observations of community profiles. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MiSeq; amplicon sequencing; internal transcribed spacer (ITS); metabarcoding; mock community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389073     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  11 in total

1.  Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research.

Authors:  Bastian V H Hornung; Romy D Zwittink; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Analysis of the Fungal Community in Ziziphi Spinosae Semen through High-Throughput Sequencing.

Authors:  Mengyue Guo; Wenjun Jiang; Jiaoyang Luo; Meihua Yang; Xiaohui Pang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  PEMA: a flexible Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Analysis of the 16S/18S ribosomal RNA, ITS, and COI marker genes.

Authors:  Haris Zafeiropoulos; Ha Quoc Viet; Katerina Vasileiadou; Antonis Potirakis; Christos Arvanitidis; Pantelis Topalis; Christina Pavloudi; Evangelos Pafilis
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 4.  Metagenomics Approaches for the Detection and Surveillance of Emerging and Recurrent Plant Pathogens.

Authors:  Edoardo Piombo; Ahmed Abdelfattah; Samir Droby; Michael Wisniewski; Davide Spadaro; Leonardo Schena
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-16

5.  Cascabel: A Scalable and Versatile Amplicon Sequence Data Analysis Pipeline Delivering Reproducible and Documented Results.

Authors:  Alejandro Abdala Asbun; Marc A Besseling; Sergio Balzano; Judith D L van Bleijswijk; Harry J Witte; Laura Villanueva; Julia C Engelmann
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Dadasnake, a Snakemake implementation of DADA2 to process amplicon sequencing data for microbial ecology.

Authors:  Christina Weißbecker; Beatrix Schnabel; Anna Heintz-Buschart
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Metabarcoding of insect-associated fungal communities: a comparison of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large-subunit (LSU) rRNA markers.

Authors:  Angelina Ceballos-Escalera; John Richards; Maria Belen Arias; Daegan J G Inward; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  MycoKeys       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Limited effect of thermal pruning on wild blueberry crop and its root-associated microbiota.

Authors:  Simon Morvan; Maxime C Paré; Anne Schmitt; Jean Lafond; Mohamed Hijri
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Fecal sample collection methods and time of day impact microbiome composition and short chain fatty acid concentrations.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Jones; Stacey N Reinke; Alishum Ali; Debra J Palmer; Claus T Christophersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Mycobiome in Health and Disease: Emerging Concepts, Methodologies and Challenges.

Authors:  Pei Yee Tiew; Micheál Mac Aogain; Nur A'tikah Binte Mohamed Ali; Kai Xian Thng; Karlyn Goh; Kenny J X Lau; Sanjay H Chotirmall
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.