Giancarlo Tirelli1, Pier Riccardo Bergamini2, Alessandro Scardoni3, Annalisa Gatto1, Francesca Boscolo Nata1, Alberto Vito Marcuzzo1. 1. Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic, Head and Neck Department, Trieste, Italy. 2. Struttura semplice di Deontologia e responsabilità professionale - Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste - ASUITS, Trieste, Italy. 3. Università degli Studi di Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Trieste, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative nerve integrity monitoring (NIM) to prevent marginal mandibular nerve injuries during neck dissection. METHODS: This prospective study compared 36 patients undergoing NIM-assisted neck dissection from July 2014 to March 2015 to a cohort of 35 patients subjected to neck dissection over an identical period of time before the technique was introduced. We also assessed possible correlations between marginal mandibular nerve injuries and other factors, such as anthropometric measurements, presence of clinical neck metastases, type of neck dissection, and site of primary tumor. RESULTS: The incidence of marginal mandibular nerve paralyses was significantly lower among the group of patients undergoing NIM-assisted neck dissection (P = .021). There was no significant difference in the duration of the procedure, and the technique resulted in a limited increase of cost. No other factor seemed to influence the onset of marginal mandibular nerve palsy. CONCLUSION: In our opinion, NIM is a valuable aid for preventing marginal mandibular nerve injuries during neck dissection.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative nerve integrity monitoring (NIM) to prevent marginal mandibular nerve injuries during neck dissection. METHODS: This prospective study compared 36 patients undergoing NIM-assisted neck dissection from July 2014 to March 2015 to a cohort of 35 patients subjected to neck dissection over an identical period of time before the technique was introduced. We also assessed possible correlations between marginal mandibular nerve injuries and other factors, such as anthropometric measurements, presence of clinical neck metastases, type of neck dissection, and site of primary tumor. RESULTS: The incidence of marginal mandibular nerve paralyses was significantly lower among the group of patients undergoing NIM-assisted neck dissection (P = .021). There was no significant difference in the duration of the procedure, and the technique resulted in a limited increase of cost. No other factor seemed to influence the onset of marginal mandibular nerve palsy. CONCLUSION: In our opinion, NIM is a valuable aid for preventing marginal mandibular nerve injuries during neck dissection.
Authors: Giancarlo Tirelli; Jasmina de Groodt; Egidio Sia; Manuel Gianvalerio Belgrano; Ferruccio Degrassi; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Maria Assunta Cova; Alberto Vito Marcuzzo Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2021-02-01