Fanny Thuriot1, Caroline Buote1, Elaine Gravel1, Sébastien Chénier1, Valérie Désilets1, Bruno Maranda1, Paula J Waters1, Pierre-Etienne Jacques2,3, Sébastien Lévesque4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. 2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. 3. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. Sebastien.A.Levesque@USherbrooke.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing (WES) combined with phenotype-driven analysis of variants in patients with suspected genetic disorders. METHODS: WES was performed on a cohort of 51 patients presenting dysmorphisms with or without neurodevelopmental disorders of undetermined etiology. For each patient, a clinical geneticist reviewed the phenotypes and used the phenotype-driven analysis software PhenoVar (http://phenovar.med.usherbrooke.ca/) to analyze WES variants. The prioritized list of potential diagnoses returned was reviewed by the clinical geneticist, who selected candidate variants to be confirmed by segregation analysis. Conventional analysis of the individual variants was performed in parallel. The resulting candidate variants were subsequently reviewed by the same geneticist, to identify any additional potential diagnoses. RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was identified in 35% of the patients using the conventional analysis, and 17 of these 18 diagnoses were independently identified using PhenoVar. The only diagnosis initially missed by PhenoVar was rescued when the optional "minimal phenotypic cutoff" filter was omitted. PhenoVar reduced by half the number of potential diagnoses per patient compared with the conventional analysis. CONCLUSION: Phenotype-driven software prioritizes WES variants, provides an efficient diagnostic aid to clinical geneticists and laboratories, and should be incorporated in clinical practice.
PURPOSE: We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing (WES) combined with phenotype-driven analysis of variants in patients with suspected genetic disorders. METHODS: WES was performed on a cohort of 51 patients presenting dysmorphisms with or without neurodevelopmental disorders of undetermined etiology. For each patient, a clinical geneticist reviewed the phenotypes and used the phenotype-driven analysis software PhenoVar (http://phenovar.med.usherbrooke.ca/) to analyze WES variants. The prioritized list of potential diagnoses returned was reviewed by the clinical geneticist, who selected candidate variants to be confirmed by segregation analysis. Conventional analysis of the individual variants was performed in parallel. The resulting candidate variants were subsequently reviewed by the same geneticist, to identify any additional potential diagnoses. RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was identified in 35% of the patients using the conventional analysis, and 17 of these 18 diagnoses were independently identified using PhenoVar. The only diagnosis initially missed by PhenoVar was rescued when the optional "minimal phenotypic cutoff" filter was omitted. PhenoVar reduced by half the number of potential diagnoses per patient compared with the conventional analysis. CONCLUSION: Phenotype-driven software prioritizes WES variants, provides an efficient diagnostic aid to clinical geneticists and laboratories, and should be incorporated in clinical practice.
Authors: Congyao Zha; Carole A Farah; Richard J Holt; Fabiola Ceroni; Lama Al-Abdi; Fanny Thuriot; Arif O Khan; Rana Helaby; Sébastien Lévesque; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Alison Kraus; Nicola K Ragge; Wayne S Sossin Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Christian Staufner; Bianca Peters; Matias Wagner; Seham Alameer; Ivo Barić; Pierre Broué; Derya Bulut; Joseph A Church; Ellen Crushell; Buket Dalgıç; Anibh M Das; Anke Dick; Nicola Dikow; Carlo Dionisi-Vici; Felix Distelmaier; Neslihan Ekşi Bozbulut; François Feillet; Emmanuel Gonzales; Nedim Hadzic; Fabian Hauck; Robert Hegarty; Maja Hempel; Theresia Herget; Christoph Klein; Vassiliki Konstantopoulou; Robert Kopajtich; Alice Kuster; Martin W Laass; Elke Lainka; Catherine Larson-Nath; Alexander Leibner; Eberhard Lurz; Johannes A Mayr; Patrick McKiernan; Karine Mention; Ute Moog; Neslihan Onenli Mungan; Korbinian M Riedhammer; René Santer; Irene Valenzuela Palafoll; Jerry Vockley; Dominik S Westphal; Arnaud Wiedemann; Saskia B Wortmann; Gaurav D Diwan; Robert B Russell; Holger Prokisch; Sven F Garbade; Stefan Kölker; Georg F Hoffmann; Dominic Lenz Journal: Genet Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Christina A Austin-Tse; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Hutton M Kearney; Heidi L Rehm; Denise L Perry; David Bick; Ryan J Taft; Eric Venner; Richard A Gibbs; Ted Young; Sarah Barnett; John W Belmont; Nicole Boczek; Shimul Chowdhury; Katarzyna A Ellsworth; Saurav Guha; Shashikant Kulkarni; Cherisse Marcou; Linyan Meng; David R Murdock; Atteeq U Rehman; Elizabeth Spiteri; Amanda Thomas-Wilson Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 6.083