BACKGROUND: For tendon tissue engineering, tenocyte-seeded scaffolds are a promising approach. Under conventional 2D culture however, tenocytes show rapid senescene and phenotype loss. We hypothesized that phenotype loss could be counteracted by simulated microgravity conditions. METHODS: Human tenocytes were exposed to microgravity for 9 days on a Random Positioning Machine (RPM). Formation of 3D-structures (spheroids) was observed under light microscopy, gene expression was measured by real-time PCR. Cells under conventional 2D-culture served as control group. RESULTS: Simulated microgravity reached a value of as low as 0.003g. Spheroid formation was observed after 4 days, and spheroids showed stable existance to the end of the observation period. After 9 days, spheroids showed a significantly higher gene expression of collagen 1 (Col1A1) compared to adherent cells under microgravity (4.4x, p=0.04) and compared to the control group (5.6x, p=0.02). Gene expression of collagen 3 (COL3A1) was significantly increased in spheroids compared to the control group (2.3x, p=0.03). Gene expressions of the extracellular matrix genes Tenascin C und Fibronectin (TNC and FN) were increased in adherent cells under microgravity compared to the 1g-control group, not reaching statistical significance (p=0.1 and p=0.3). For the gene expression of vimentin, no significant alteration was observed both in the adherent cells and in the spheroids compared to the 1g control group. Gene expression of the tenocyte-specific transcription factor scleraxis (SCX) was significantly increased in spheroids compared to the control group (3.7x, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Simulated microgravity could counteract tenocyte senescence in vitro and serve as a promising model for scaffold-free 3D cell culturing and tissue engineering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (laboratory study).
BACKGROUND: For tendon tissue engineering, tenocyte-seeded scaffolds are a promising approach. Under conventional 2D culture however, tenocytes show rapid senescene and phenotype loss. We hypothesized that phenotype loss could be counteracted by simulated microgravity conditions. METHODS: Human tenocytes were exposed to microgravity for 9 days on a Random Positioning Machine (RPM). Formation of 3D-structures (spheroids) was observed under light microscopy, gene expression was measured by real-time PCR. Cells under conventional 2D-culture served as control group. RESULTS: Simulated microgravity reached a value of as low as 0.003g. Spheroid formation was observed after 4 days, and spheroids showed stable existance to the end of the observation period. After 9 days, spheroids showed a significantly higher gene expression of collagen 1 (Col1A1) compared to adherent cells under microgravity (4.4x, p=0.04) and compared to the control group (5.6x, p=0.02). Gene expression of collagen 3 (COL3A1) was significantly increased in spheroids compared to the control group (2.3x, p=0.03). Gene expressions of the extracellular matrix genes Tenascin C und Fibronectin (TNC and FN) were increased in adherent cells under microgravity compared to the 1g-control group, not reaching statistical significance (p=0.1 and p=0.3). For the gene expression of vimentin, no significant alteration was observed both in the adherent cells and in the spheroids compared to the 1g control group. Gene expression of the tenocyte-specific transcription factor scleraxis (SCX) was significantly increased in spheroids compared to the control group (3.7x, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Simulated microgravity could counteract tenocyte senescence in vitro and serve as a promising model for scaffold-free 3D cell culturing and tissue engineering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (laboratory study).
Authors: Xiao Ma; Jessica Pietsch; Markus Wehland; Herbert Schulz; Katrin Saar; Norbert Hübner; Johann Bauer; Markus Braun; Achim Schwarzwälder; Jürgen Segerer; Maria Birlem; Astrid Horn; Ruth Hemmersbach; Kai Waßer; Jirka Grosse; Manfred Infanger; Daniela Grimm Journal: FASEB J Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jiovanni A Di Battista; Wassim Shebaby; Ozge Kizilay; Eva Hamade; Raghida Abou Merhi; Saida Mebarek; Dina Abdallah; Bassam Badran; Fady Saad; Eddie K Abdalla; Wissam H Faour Journal: Inflamm Res Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.575
Authors: Brian C Pridgen; Colin Y L Woon; Maxwell Kim; Johan Thorfinn; Derek Lindsey; Hung Pham; James Chang Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Dan Deng; Wei Liu; Feng Xu; Yang Yang; Guangdong Zhou; Wen Jie Zhang; Lei Cui; Yilin Cao Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Zhen Lin; Jonathan B Fitzgerald; Jiake Xu; Craig Willers; David Wood; Alan J Grodzinsky; Ming H Zheng Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Dorothea Dietrichs; Daniela Grimm; Jayashree Sahana; Daniela Melnik; Thomas J Corydon; Markus Wehland; Marcus Krüger; Randy Vermeesen; Bjorn Baselet; Sarah Baatout; Trine Engelbrecht Hybel; Stefan Kahlert; Herbert Schulz; Manfred Infanger; Sascha Kopp Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2022-02-17