| Literature DB >> 29387575 |
Ademola Clement Famurewa1, Fidelis Ebele Ejezie2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Literature has confirmed the pathogenic role of cadmium (Cd) and its exposure in the induction of dyslipidemia implicated in the development and increasing incidence of cardiovascular diseases. The current study explored whether polyphenolics isolated from virgin coconut oil (VCO) prevent Cd-induced dyslipidemia and investigate the underlying mechanism of action, in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Cadmium; Cardiovascular risks; Dyslipidemia; Lipid profile; Polyphenols
Year: 2018 PMID: 29387575 PMCID: PMC5787998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Effects of polyphenols (PF), cadmium (Cd) and their co-administration on serum TC, TG, VLDL-C, LDL-C and HDL-C levels (mg/dl).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4.44 ± 0.16 | 1.40 ± 0.05 | 0.70 0.02 | 1.69 0.15 | 2.04 ± 0.03 |
|
| 4.03 ± 0.05 | 1.42 ± 0.02 | 0.71 0.01 | 1.25 0.06 | 2.04 ± 0.01 |
|
| 4.98 ± 0.17 | 1.72 ± 0.03 | 0.86 0.02 | 2.16 0.22 | 1.86 0.06 |
|
| 4.25 ± 0.09 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 1.46 ± 0.10 | 2.02 ± 0.03 |
|
| 4.29 ± 0.08 | 1.52 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 1.54 ± 0.08 | 2.00 ± 0.04 |
|
| 3.98 ± 0.08 | 1.50 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 2.07 ± 0.01 |
Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant.
p<0.05: the difference is significant compared to control group in the same column.
p<0.05: the difference is significant compared to Cd group in the same column.
Effects of polyphenols (PF), cadmium (Cd) and their co-administration on atherogenic index (AI), coronary risk index (CRI) and cardiovascular risk index (CVRI) in treated rats.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.83 ± 0.07 | 2.16 ± 0.07 | 0.68 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.61 ± 0.03 | 1.97 ±0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.01 |
|
| 1.19 ±0.15 | 2.71 ± 0.15 | 0.93 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.73 ±0.06 | 2.11 ±0.06 | 0.76 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.78 ± 0.05 | 2.16 ±0.06 | 0.77 ±0.02 |
|
| 0.56 ± 0.04 | 1.92 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ±0.01 |
Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant.
p<0.05: the difference is significant compared to control group in the same column.
p<0.05: the difference is significant compared to Cd group in the same column.
Total phenol content, DPPH scavenging activity and ferric reducing antioxidant reducing power (FRAP) of methanol-extracted polyphenol fraction
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 57.11 ± 0.05 | 68.24 ± 0.10 | 48.96 ± 0.29 |
Values represent mean ± SEM of triplicate analysis. DPPH: 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl.
Figure 1Effect of administration of polyphenols (PF), and Cadmium (Cd), as well as their co-administration on hepatic superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in Cd-treated rats. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant. *p<0.01: significant when compared to control group; #p<0.01: significant when compared to Cd group
Figure 2Effect of administration of polyphenols (PF), and cadmium (Cd) as well as their co-administration on hepatic catalase (CAT) activity in Cd-treated rats. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant. *p<0.01: significant when compared to control group; #p<0.01: significant when compared to Cd group
Figure 3Effect of administration of polyphenols (PF), cadmium (Cd) as well as their co-administration on hepatic glutathione (GSH) content in Cd-treated rats. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant. *p<0.01: significant when compared to control group; #p<0.01: significant when compared to Cd group
Figure 4Effect of administration of polyphenols (PF), cadmium (Cd) as well as their co-administration on hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA) content in Cd-treated rats. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (n=8). A p<0.05 was considered significant. *p<0.001: significant when compared to control group; #p<0.01: significant when compared to Cd group