| Literature DB >> 29387373 |
Annalisa Romano1, Paolo Masi1,2, Silvana Cavella1,2.
Abstract
Visual inspection is an important part of quality control not only for manufacturers but also for retailers and consumers. The object of this investigation was to determine fat content in sliced salami by means of image analysis. The image analysis procedure is applied to digital images of sliced Italian salami produced in 16 different salami factories (A-P). The image analysis method described in this work is nondestructive and the necessary equipment is cheap. It extracts directly interpretable parameters of fat particle morphology (e.g., area, roundness) and number of fat particles from 15 digital images for each sample (A-P). The correlations between the fat features extracted from the images with the chemical fat content measured on the samples were also studied. Good relationships were found between the fat particle characteristics measured by image analysis procedure and the percentage of chemically extractable fat by correlation (R2=0.75) and principal component analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Fat content; image analysis; meat; pork; sliced Italian salami; structure
Year: 2017 PMID: 29387373 PMCID: PMC5778206 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Image of sliced salami batches a–p
Figure 2Image of salami slice (a) and processed image of salami slice (b)
Figure 3Typical frequency distribution of area of salami's FPs (Trial E)
Results after object analysis, expressed as means±SD
| Samples |
|
| AF |
| RF | V FC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.44±0.2cd | 0.085±0.01ab | 0.81±0.5ab | 1.50±0.5a | 6.16±1.7bc | 11.84±1.2b |
| B | 1.10±0.2a | 0.133±0.02fg | 0.75±0.2a | 1.79±0.3b | 4.41±1.1ab | 11.37±1.1b |
| C | 0.99±0.2a | 0.174±0.02e | 1.25±0.0bc | 2.03±0.3c | 4.77±0.7ab | 14.30±0.9cd |
| D | 1.19±0.1ab | 0.084±0.01a | 0.83±0.4ab | 1.72±0.0a | 3.89±0.3a | 8.74±1.0a |
| E | 1.42±0.2c | 0.083±0.00a | 0.69±0.0a | 1.90±0.1b | 4.75±0.5ab | 11.56±1.5b |
| F | 1.30±0.1b | 0.135±0.03fg | 1.19±0.4bc | 1.92±0.0bc | 4.73±0.2ab | 15.64±1.0d |
| G | 1.38±0.2c | 0.122±0.02ef | 1.01±0.5b | 1.93±0.1bc | 4.48±0.5ab | 14.11±1.1cd |
| H | 1.54±0.6d | 0.089±0.01b | 1.19±0.3bc | 2.08±0.1c | 7.90±0.1d | 11.33±0.2b |
| I | 1.76±0.2e | 0.075±0.01a | 0.90±0.3ab | 2.00±0.1c | 6.41±0.0c | 13.05±2.1bc |
| J | 1.14±0.2ab | 0.099±0.01bc | 0.68±0.2a | 1.86±0.2b | 4.91±1.4b | 9.75±0.6a |
| K | 1.41±0.2c | 0.112±0.01cd | 1.60±0.2d | 2.05±0.1c | 6.18±0.5bc | 15.60±1.5d |
| L | 1.45±0.4cd | 0.085±0.01ab | 0.82±0.2ab | 1.89±0.1b | 5.53±1.3b | 12.03±0.8b |
| M | 1.40±0.2c | 0.123±0.01ef | 0.91±0.1ab | 1.97±0.1c | 5.22±0.3b | 15.33±1.8d |
| N | 1.29±0.1b | 0.118±0.03de | 1.03±0.2b | 2.06±0.1c | 5.71±1.2bc | 14.44±0.7cd |
| O | 1.87±0.2e | 0.138±0.01g | 1.33±0.3c | 2.05±0.1c | 6.32±1.1c | 18.52±0.3e |
| P | 1.68±0.4de | 0.095±0.01c | 1.20±0.3bc | 2.08±0.1c | 7.91±0.1d | 14.46±1.6cd |
Means with a column with different letters are significantly different (Duncan's test p<.05).
V FC, visible fat content.
Figure 4Results of principal component analysis—loading and score biplot for A–P samples
Figure 5Comparison of fat content by chemical measurement (Ch FC) and image analysis (V FC) for sliced salami (data: filled circles; model: continuous line)