| Literature DB >> 29387366 |
Kazeem K Olatoye1,2, Gibson L Arueya2.
Abstract
In this study, safety of novel food from aerial yam and Treculia africana, underutilized food materials with high-nutritive value and health benefits were investigated. Animal experiment involving the use of thirty (30) male albino rats was conducted for 28 days.Thereafter, rats in all groups were sacrificed and blood samples collected for biochemical analysis and hematological assay. Some vital organs were harvested and used for histological analysis. Biochemical and hematological parameters were not significantly p ≤ .05 different among the treatment and controls. However there was an increase in monocytes, which is a reflection of immune boosting potential of the novel snack. No significant pathological changes were observed in liver and kidney of rats fed with this snack. Rats showed no signs of toxicity within the study period. These findings suggest that product may be safe and useful as an Immune adjuvant.Entities:
Keywords: African breadfruit seeds; aerial yam; extruded snack; toxicology
Year: 2017 PMID: 29387366 PMCID: PMC5778208 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Flowchart for the production of extruded snacks from aerial yam and African breadfruit seeds
Animal grouping and diets consumed
| Group | EE0 (I) | EE1 (II) | EE2 (III) | EE3 (IV) | EE4 (V) | EE5 (VI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AYF: ABF | 100:00 | 00:100 | 80: 20 | 65:35 | Normal diet | Casein |
AYF, aerial yam flour; ABF, African breadfruit seeds flour.
Biochemical profile of rats fed with AYF/ABF based snacks
| Sample | Total protein | Albumin | Globulin | A/G | AST | ALT | ALP | Urea | Creatinin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE0 | 6.70 ± 0.43a | 2.13 ± 0.30a | 4.58 ± 0.56a | 0.47 ± 0.07a | 43.75 ± 2.17a | 32.75 ± 0.75a | 115.5 ± 5.50a | 14.20 ± 0.47a | 0.68 ± 0.08a |
| EE1 | 7.05 ± 00.32a | 1.90 ± 0.20a | 4.63 ± 0.36a | 0.41 ± 0.04a | 43.00 ± 3.34a | 30.75 ± 2.39a | 121.00 ± 5.24a | 13.73 ± 0.28a | 0.58 ± 0.05a |
| EE2 | 7.50 ± 0.52a | 2.58 ± 0.65a | 4.93 ± 0.28a | 0.53 ± 0.15a | 43.25 ± 2.66a | 30.75 ± 2.02a | 115.75 ± 3.97a | 16.63 ± 1.75a | 0.80 ± 0.15a |
| EE3 | 6.65 ± 0.51a | 2.20 ± 0.54a | 4.68 ± 0.59a | 0.49 ± 0.13a | 41.50 ± 0.02a | 31.50 ± 1.44a | 116.25 ± 5.14a | 14.80 ± 1.27a | 0.75 ± 0.16a |
| EE4 | 7.00 ± 0.42a | 2.43 ± 0.34a | 4.58 ± 0.93a | 0.58 ± 0.13a | 40.75 ± 2.06a | 29.75 ± 1.89a | 107.75 ± 2.75a | 15.90 ± 1.08a | 0.85 ± 0.12a |
| EE5 | 7.13 ± 0.39a | 2.60 ± 0.52a | 4.53 ± 0.57a | 0.60 ± 0.14a | 36.75 ± 0.63a | 27.50 ± 0.96a | 109.75 ± 5.98a | 16.33 ± 1.12a | 0.80 ± 0.08a |
Means with the same superscript in the same column are not significantly different ( p ≤ .05).
Influence of AYF/ABF snacks consumption on some Red blood cell parameters
| Samples | PCV (%) | HB (g/dl) | RBC × 1012/L | MCV (fl) | MCH (pg) | MCHC (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE0 | 41.00 ± 0.71bc | 13.50 ± 0.25b | 6.77 ± 0.21ab | 60.64 ± 0.89a | 19.97 ± 0.29a | 32.93 ± 0.15a |
| EE1 | 46.25 ± 1.03a | 15.15 ± 0.29a | 7.77 ± 0.24a | 59.62 ± 0.69a | 19.53 ± 0.25a | 32.77 ± 0.15a |
| EE2 | 46.00 ± 2.20a | 15.45 ± 0.29a | 7.77 ± 0.45a | 59.29 ± 0.69a | 19.89 ± 0.21a | 33.55 ± 0.37a |
| EE3 | 39.25 ± 2.02c | 13.05 ± 0.65b | 6.44 ± 0.42b | 61.20 ± 1.70a | 20.35 ± 0.54a | 33.25 ± 0.13a |
| EE4 | 46.50 ± 1.19a | 15.60 ± 0.38a | 7.82 ± 0.30a | 59.57 ± 0.78a | 19.99 ± 0.37a | 33.55 ± 0.22a |
| EE5 | 44.50 ± 1.25ab | 14.55 ± 0.44ab | 7.54 ± 0.23a | 59.06 ± 1.00a | 19.31 ± 0.27a | 32.71 ± 0.64a |
| Normal | 45.80 ± 2.7 | 14.30 ± 1.10 | 7.04 ± 0.81 | 65.40 ± 4.9 | 20.50 ± 1.3 | 31.30 ± 0.9 |
Means with the same superscript in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Influence of AYF/ABF snacks consumption on some white blood cell parameters
| Samples | WBC × 103µl | Lymphocyt % | Neutrophils % | Monocytes % | Eosinophils% | Platelets | AST/Platelet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE0 | 6.81 ± 1.09a | 61.00 ± 3.16a | 34.75 ± 3.22a | 2.00 ± 0.41ab | 2.25 ± 0.25a | 1.33 ± 0.13a | 0.34 ± 0.03bc |
| EE1 | 7.55 ± 0.52a | 60.25 ± 2.32a | 36.25 ± 2.02a | 1.50 ± 0.38b | 2.00 ± 0.58a | 1.35 ± 0.10a | 0.32 ± 0.03bc |
| EE2 | 6.16 ± 1.52a | 67.50 ± 3.97a | 28.50 ± 4.44a | 2.75 ± 0.25a | 1.25 ± 0.96a | 0.70 ± 0.20a | 0.55 ± 0.03a |
| EE3 | 5.43 ± 1.04a | 57.50 ± 3.78a | 28.50 ± 4.09a | 2.00 ± 0.41ab | 1.15 ± 0.58a | 0.99 ± 0.12a | 0.45 ± 0.04ab |
| EE4 | 8.23 ± 0.93a | 66.00 ± 3.42a | 30.50 ± 3.43a | 1.75 ± 0.25ab | 1.41 ± 0.71a | 1.55 ± 0.13a | 0.27 ± 0.03c |
| EE5 | 6.74 ± 2.27a | 62.74 ± 2.74a | 34.50 ± 3.30a | 1.75 ± 0.49ab | 1.75 ± 0.25a | 0.89 ± 0.29a | 0.40 ± 0.06bc |
Means with the same superscript in the same column are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Liver Histology of rats fed with AYF‐ABF based Snack:(a0)Photomicrograph of the liver of rat with 100%AYF with no traces of necrosis and lesions; (a1)Photomicrograph of the liver of rats fed with100% ABF showing no evidence of necrosis and lesions; (a2)Photomicrograph of the liver of rats fed with 80%AYF and 20% ABF also showing no necrosis and lesions; (a3)Photomicrograph of the liver of rat fed with 65%AYF and 35%ABFwithnormal appearance; (a4)Photomicrograph of the liver of rat fed with normal diet showing normal appearance; (a5)Photomicrograph of the liver of rat fed with AYF and Casein showing normal appearance.
Key: Mag x100, Inset: X400
Figure 3Kidney Histology of rats fed with AYF‐ABF based Snack: (b0)Photomicrograph of the kidney of rat fed with100%AYF showing no form of necrosis and interlobular oedema; (b1)Photomicrograph of the kidney of rats fed with 100% ABF, showing no necrosis and lesions; (b2)Photomicrograph of the kidney of rats fed with 80%AYF and 20%ABF showing no necrosis and lesions; (b3) Photomicrograph of the kidney of rat fed with 65%AYF and 35%ABFwith normal appearance;(b4)Photomicrograph of the kidneyof rat fedwith normal diet showingnormal appearance; (b5)Photomicrograph of the kidney of rat fed with AYF and casein showing normal appearance.
Key: Mag x100, Inset x400