| Literature DB >> 29387345 |
Allison Muller1,2, Xavier Bertrand1,2, Anne-Marie Rogues3,4, Muriel Péfau4, Serge Alfandari5, Rémy Gauzit6, Catherine Dumartin3,4, Houssein Gbaguidi-Haore1,2,7.
Abstract
Background: The ongoing extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) pandemic has led to an increasing carbapenem use, requiring release of guidelines for carbapenem usage in France in late 2010. We sought to determine factors associated with changes in carbapenem use in intensive care units (ICUs), medical and surgical wards between 2009 and 2013.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic stewardship; Antibiotic use; Carbapenem; ESBL; Multidrug-resistant bacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29387345 PMCID: PMC5778631 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-018-0302-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
Characteristics of participating hospital wards across France
| Characteristic | ICU wards, | Medical wards, | Surgical wards, |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of beds in 2013, median (interquartile range) | 12 (9–16) | 72 (36–150) | 63 (44–99) |
| Type of HCF | |||
| - University hospital | 4 (4.7%) | 4 (1.8%) | 4 (2.2%) |
| - General hospital | 67 (78.8%) | 139 (61.2%) | 95 (52.5%) |
| - Private hospital | 9 (10.6%) | 51 (22.5%) | 71 (39.2%) |
| - Cancer centre | 0 | 6 (2.6%) | 6 (3.3%) |
| - Local hospital | 0 | 17 (7.5%) | 0 |
| - Rehabilitation and long-term care facility | 0 | 5 (2.2%) | 0 |
| - Military hospital | 5 (5.9%) | 5 (2.2%) | 5 (2.8%) |
| Geographical area | |||
| - North | 30 (35.3%) | 50 (22%) | 45 (24.9%) |
| - West | 9 (10.6%) | 25 (11%) | 17 (9.4%) |
| - East | 14 (16.5%) | 45 (19.8%) | 36 (19.9%) |
| - South-east | 12 (14.1%) | 33 (14.5%) | 31 (17.1%) |
| - South-west | 20 (23.5%) | 74 (32.6%) | 52 (28.7%) |
ICU intensive care unit; HCF type of healthcare facility from which the hospital ward included in the study was derived
Use of carbapenems and other antibiotic classes in hospital wards across France, 2009–2013
| Antibiotic use, DDDs per 1000 patient-days (RC)a | ICU wards, | Medical wards, | Surgical wards, |
|---|---|---|---|
| All antibiotics | 1487 (−0.52%) | 615 (−0.89%) | 607 (+ 5.68%) |
| Carbapenems | 73.4 (+ 5.65%) | 6.2 (+ 24.1%) | 5.4 (+ 25.1%) |
| - Imipenem | 62.1 (−0.74%) | 5.3 (+ 13.9%) | 4.2 (+ 27.5%) |
| - Meropenem | 5.3 (+ 285%) | 0.36 (+ 195%) | 0.23 (+ 109%) |
| - Ertapenem | 4.87 (−20.4%) | 0.52 (+ 45.3%) | 0.86 (− 13.3%) |
| - Doripenem | 1.17 (−16.7%) | 0.04 (+ 208%) | 0.06 (+ 1125%) |
| Aminopenicillins ± β-lactamase inhibitors | 417 (−2.86%) | 318 (−1.65%) | 268 (+ 0.94%) |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam | 90.1 (+ 34.7%) | 8.6 (+ 79%) | 8 (+ 109%) |
| Third-generation cephalosporins | 205.9 (+ 0.78%) | 60.4 (+ 18.9%) | 38.1 (+33.2%) |
| Fluoroquinolones | 177.2 (−24.2%) | 88.4 (− 21.3%) | 75.1 (−13.1%) |
| Aminoglycosides | 106.1 (+3.35%) | 12.4 (−6.98%) | 25.4 (+ 13.8%) |
| Glycopeptides | 59.6 (−23.2%) | 9.8 (−5.1%) | 10.3 (+ 23.6%) |
| Imidazoles | 61.9 (−3.93%) | 20.2 (+ 20.6%) | 39.6 (+ 9.96%) |
DDD defined daily dose; ICU intensive care unit; RC relative change (%) between 2009 and 2013
aPooled means in DDDs per 1000 patient-days and relative changes in percent
Fig. 1Changes in carbapenem use in hospital wards across France from 2009 to 2013. For each time period (2009–10, 2011–13 and 2009–13), the relative change and the annual growth rate of carbapenem consumption (in bold) were computed. CI, confidence interval; DDD defined daily dose
Factors associated with the reduction in carbapenem use from random-effects logistic regression model
| Variable | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR |
| OR |
| 95% CI | |
| Type of ward (reference: Medical) | |||||
| ICU | 0.94 | 0.83 |
|
|
|
| Surgical | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.19 | 0.35–1.23 |
| Ward size in 2013, per increase of 50 beds | 0.90 | 0.14 |
|
|
|
| Type of HCF (reference: General hospital) | |||||
| University hospital | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.03–2.39 |
| Private hospital | 1.06 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.28 | 0.31–1.40 |
| Cancer centre | 0.37 | 0.29 |
|
|
|
| Local hospital | 2.33 | 0.18 | 1.19 | 0.83 | 0.25–5.54 |
| Rehabilitation and long-term care facility | 0.38 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.01–6.59 |
| Military hospital | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.02–1.28 |
| Geographical area (reference: South-east) | |||||
| North | 1.42 | 0.42 | 2.33 | 0.09 | 0.88–6.16 |
| West | 1.15 | 0.80 | 1.09 | 0.90 | 0.30–3.94 |
| East | 1.93 | 0.15 |
|
|
|
| South-west | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1.57 | 0.36 | 0.60–4.12 |
| Antibiotic use, DDDs per 1000 patients-days | |||||
| Initial CBP useb | 1.01 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.08 | 0.95–1.00 |
| Initial prescribing profile of CBPsc | 1.22 | 0.002 |
|
|
|
| Initial 3GC useb | 1.00 | 0.79 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of 3GCsc | 0.97 | 0.16 |
|
|
|
| Reduction in 3GC used | 1.34 | 0.23 | |||
| Initial FQ useb | 1.00 | 0.25 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of FQsc | 1.02 | 0.29 | |||
| Reduction in FQ used | 2.21 | 0.004 |
|
|
|
| Initial AG useb | 1.00 | 0.50 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of AGsc | 0.97 | 0.44 | |||
| Reduction in AG used | 1.56 | 0.06 | 1.13 | 0.67 | 0.65–1.96 |
| Initial AP ± BLI useb | 1.00 | 0.83 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of AP±BLIsc | 1.00 | 0.99 | |||
| Reduction in AP ± BLI used | 1.10 | 0.68 | |||
| Initial Imidazole useb | 1.00 | 0.98 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of imidazolesc | 0.97 | 0.45 | |||
| Reduction in imidazole used | 1.65 | 0.03 | 1.50 | 0.15 | 0.87–2.59 |
| Initial GP useb | 1.00 | 0.95 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of GPsc | 0.97 | 0.61 | |||
| Reduction in GP used | 1.83 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
| Initial TZP useb | 1.00 | 0.99 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of TZPc | 0.95 | 0.33 | |||
| Reduction in TZP used | 4.24 | < 0.001 |
|
|
|
| Initial use of other alternatives to CBPsb | 1.00 | 0.88 | |||
| Initial prescribing profile of other alternatives to CBPsc | 1.31 | 0.25 | |||
| Reduction in the use of other alternatives to CBPsd | 1.07 | 0.79 | |||
| Initial overall antibiotic useb | 1.00 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99–1.01 |
| Reduction in the overall antibiotic used | 2.02 | 0.003 | 1.38 | 0.29 | 0.76–2.51 |
| Region with high ESBL-PE incidence rate in acute care settingse | 0.65 | 0.12 |
|
|
|
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit, HCF healthcare facility, DDD defined daily dose, CBP carbapenem, 3GC third-generation cephalosporin, FQ fluoroquinolone, AG aminoglycoside, AP ± BLI aminopenicillin ± β-lactamase inhibitor, GP glycopeptide, TZP piperacillin/tazobactam. ESBL-PE extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
aSignificant associations (p < 0.05) from multivariable analysis are highlighted in bold italic
bConsumption of a given antibiotic in 2009
cProportion (%) of a given antibiotic in the total antibiotic consumption in 2009
dReduction in the consumption of a given antibiotic between 2009 and 2013
eData from the French multidrug-resistant bacteria surveillance network; BMR-RAISIN, 2011