Literature DB >> 29386807

Evaluation of clinico-pathological reports and recurrence of 20 cases of localized gingival overgrowths.

Girish Parshuram Bhutada1, Mitul Kumar Mishra1, Salam Tarique Ansari1, Anand Narayanrao Wankhede1, Geetika Sanjiv Soni1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinico-histopathological picture and to examine the recurrence of various localized hyperplastic gingival growths after their surgical treatment. Twenty patients of localized hyperplastic gingival outgrowth were evaluated in the present clinico-histopathological study. The data regarding age, sex, location, size, and duration of lesion were summarized. After 4 weeks of initial therapy, an excision of the growth with conventional flap surgery was performed. The excised tissues were sent for histopathological analysis, and the lesions were reclassified into four groups. All the patients were recalled after 3 and 6 months to study the recurrence of the growth. Twenty lesions were inspected, the pyogenic granuloma was the most common (55%), followed by peripheral fibroma (25%), peripheral giant cell granuloma (15%), and calcifying fibroblastic fibroma (5%). Out of the twenty lesions evaluated, the pyogenic granuloma was the most common with no recurrence in any case.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional flap surgery; localized hyperplastic gingival overgrowth; pyogenic granuloma

Year:  2017        PMID: 29386807      PMCID: PMC5767997          DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_414_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol        ISSN: 0972-124X


INTRODUCTION

Gingival mucosa is under constant irritation from masticatory forces, minor trauma, plaque, calculus, and iatrogenic factors. One of the types of gingival tissue reactions to these irritants is by developing a type of localized growth. These common localized gingival growths are nonspecific hyperplastic reaction due to inflammation and not due to neoplasia (Cooke, 1952). The purpose of the present case series is to assess the clinico-histopathological picture and to examine the recurrence of various localized hyperplastic gingival growths after their surgical treatment.

CASE REPORT

Twenty patients who reported with localized hyperplastic gingival outgrowth in the outpatient department of periodontics, during the years 2010–2011, were included in the present study. The clinical data regarding age, sex, location, size, and duration of lesion were arranged along with the blood investigations (complete hemogram). Pregnant and lactating females, patients with known systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, epilepsy, or organ transplantation, and smokers were excluded from the study. Before the initial therapy, the cases with isolated lesions and normal blood limits were only selected. After 4 weeks of initial therapy that included thorough subgingival scaling under local anesthesia to reduce the inflammatory component of the overgrowth, excision of the growth along its entire base with conventional flap surgery was performed. After degranulation of the tissues, interdental sutures were placed to close the wound. The surgical wound was covered by Coe-pak © and left in place about a week to facilitate quick healing [Figure 1a–d].[1] Amoxicillin was prescribed as a prophylactic drug to all the patients for 5 days in addition to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and instructed to use chlorhexidine 0.2% twice daily as an antiplaque agent for 4 weeks.[2],[3] The excised tissues were sent in 10% formalin-containing bulb to the department of oral and maxillofacial pathology for histopathology. Histologic slides were made as 6-micron paraffin sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All the slides were inspected histopathologically and the lesions were reclassified into four groups classified by Buchner (1977) using the following histopathological features.
Figure 1

(a) Initial preparation on the 1st day. (b) Three weeks after initial therapy. (c) After excision, full-thickness flap raised. (d) Interrupted sutures were placed

(a) Initial preparation on the 1st day. (b) Three weeks after initial therapy. (c) After excision, full-thickness flap raised. (d) Interrupted sutures were placed

Pyogenic granuloma

This group of lesion shows numerous proliferating endothelial cells lined in vascular spaces, in cellular connective tissue stroma. It shows dense chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate. The lesions are covered with stratified squamous epithelium of variable thickness and ulceration in some cases [Figure 2a].
Figure 2

(a) Histopathological picture of pyogenic granuloma showing granulation tissue (H and E). (b) Histopathological picture of fibrous hyperplasia showing fibrous tissue (H and E). (c) Histopathological picture of peripheral giant cell granuloma showing giant cells in capillary (H and E). (d) Histopathological picture of calcifying fibroblastic fibroma showing calcification (H and E)

(a) Histopathological picture of pyogenic granuloma showing granulation tissue (H and E). (b) Histopathological picture of fibrous hyperplasia showing fibrous tissue (H and E). (c) Histopathological picture of peripheral giant cell granuloma showing giant cells in capillary (H and E). (d) Histopathological picture of calcifying fibroblastic fibroma showing calcification (H and E)

Fibrous hyperplasia

This group of lesions is covered by a layer of keratinized squamous epithelium and consists of irregularly arranged bundles of collagen fibers and fibroblasts in varying proportions [Figure 2b].

Peripheral giant cell granuloma

This group of lesion consists of numerous multinucleated giant cells of variable size and shape in the cellular connective tissue stroma. Numerous capillaries grow in the lesion, particularly around its periphery. It is covered by keratinized squamous epithelium [Figure 2c].

Calcifying fibroblastic fibroma

It is nothing but the fibrous hyperplasia with calcification. It consists of cellular connective tissue stroma and foci of dystrophic calcification [Figure 2d]. All the patients were recalled after 3 and 6 months to study the recurrence of the growth. To summarize, the main outcome measures investigated were the patients' age, sex, location, size, duration of lesion, result of treatment, and histopathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The chief complaint in most cases was painless swelling on gums. Other complaints included bleeding gums and bad breath. The duration of chief complaints ranged from 3 to 24 months (mean: 7 months). The majority of patients exhibited poor oral hygiene. All the lesions were described as soft to firm in consistency. The base was pedunculated in 80% of the cases and sessile in the remaining 20% of cases. Grossly, the pyogenic lesions were more often pedunculated than sessile and clinically they vary from deep red to pale pink. All the fibroma lesions were pedunculated and pink. Peripheral giant cell lesions were more often sessile and ranged from red to purplish in color [Figure 3a–d].
Figure 3

(a) Clinical picture of pyogenic granuloma. (b) Clinical picture of fibrous hyperplasia. (c) Clinical picture of peripheral giant cell granuloma. (d) Clinical picture of calcifying fibroblastic fibroma

(a) Clinical picture of pyogenic granuloma. (b) Clinical picture of fibrous hyperplasia. (c) Clinical picture of peripheral giant cell granuloma. (d) Clinical picture of calcifying fibroblastic fibroma Out of the twenty lesions perused, the pyogenic granuloma was the most prevalent (55%), followed by peripheral fibroma (25%), peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) (15%), and calcifying fibroblastic fibroma (5%) [Tables 1–4].
Table 1

Distribution of the lesions according to sex and age

Table 4

Size range of each lesion

Distribution of the lesions according to sex and age Age and sex distribution of individual lesion Distribution of individual lesions in either jaw Size range of each lesion The period of follow-up ranged from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. About two-third of the patients did not keep their review appointments beyond a week and only seven patients came for review after 6 months. However, no recurrence was noted in any of these seven patients [Figure 4a–c and].
Figure 4

(a) At baseline. (b) Follow-up at 7 days. (c) Follow-up at 6 months

(a) At baseline. (b) Follow-up at 7 days. (c) Follow-up at 6 months

DISCUSSION

The present study was done to evaluate the discrete nature of localized hyperplastic gingival lesions clinically and histopathologically in a series of twenty treated cases. Although the number of patients may be undersized to make any unblurred assertion about the age, sex, etc., we may presuppose that all the localized hyperplastic gingival growths affect people of all ages and both the sexes. The number of patients who came for a follow-up was only 7 out of 20, thus a small number to predict the recurrence of the lesion after surgery. Hence, we cannot correctly comment on the recurrence rate. In the present study, pyogenic granuloma was found in all age groups with a mean age of 34 years. This finding was similar to that of 33 years reported by Angelopoulos et al. 1971 in a Nigerian population.[4] In the present study, pyogenic granuloma was more common in males than females. This finding differs to what Angelopoulos, 1971, and Lowoyin, 1997, have reported.[5] Fibrous hyperplasia or fibroma was also found in similar age group as that of pyogenic granuloma, with a mean age of 39 years. It was like Darlington who also quoted the fourth decade.[6] Buchner et al. in 1977 found a mean age of 39 years which was exactly similar to our study.[7] Eversole et al in 1972 and Felleret al in 2004 observed that fibrous hyperplasia was more common in females, and this is confirmed by our study.[8],[9] In agreement with our findings, Cooke also found no marked differences regarding the location of fibroma in either jaw. In the present study, PGCG was found more commonly in fourth decade with a mean age of 34.66 years and in females like what Giansanti and Waldron reported in 1969. Giansanti et al in 1969[10] reported that PGCG was more common in the mandible than maxilla, but in the present study, it was more common in maxilla than the mandible. In this case series, all the studied lesions were benign. Kfir et al in 1980 has stated that excision is the treatment of choice for fibrous epulis and similar lesions.[11] Al-Khateeb et al in 2003 have stated that the recurrent lesions could be a result of incomplete excision or treating such lesions by cautery or laser.[12] Lawoyinet al 1997 have reported that lesions must be excised down till the underlying periosteum, and the predisposing irritants must be removed to avoid the possibility of recurrence.[13] Therefore, in the present case series report, all the lesions were treated by surgical excision followed by conventional flap surgery to ensure adequate excision of the lesion with its entire base.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
Table 2

Age and sex distribution of individual lesion

Table 3

Distribution of individual lesions in either jaw

  13 in total

Review 1.  Systemic antibiotics in the treatment of periodontal disease.

Authors:  Jørgen Slots; Miriam Ting
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Pyogenic granuloma of the oral cavity: statistical analysis of its clinical features.

Authors:  A P Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1971-12

3.  Peripheral fibroma and peripheral fibroma with calcification: report of 376 cases.

Authors:  S N Bhaskar; J R Jacoway
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Reactive lesions of the gingiva.

Authors:  L R Eversole; S Rovin
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1972

Review 5.  Response of chronic and aggressive periodontitis to treatment.

Authors:  David E Deas; Brian L Mealey
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 6.  Cemento-ossifying fibroma: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Liviu Feller; Archie Buskin; Erich J Raubenheimer
Journal:  J Int Acad Periodontol       Date:  2004-10

7.  Localized hyperplastic lesions of the gingiva: a clinicopathological study of 302 lesions.

Authors:  A Buchner; S Calderon; Y Ramon
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Reactive lesions of the gingiva. A clinicopathological study of 741 cases.

Authors:  Y Kfir; A Buchner; L S Hansen
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Oral pyogenic granuloma in Jordanians: a retrospective analysis of 108 cases.

Authors:  Taiseer Al-Khateeb; Khansa Ababneh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Zahra Baghani; Maryam Torshabi; Bahar Basirat
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.