Literature DB >> 29386419

Powdered gloves: Time to bid adieu.

S Srinivasan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386419      PMCID: PMC5820822          DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_583_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


× No keyword cloud information.
I read the article on powdered gloves by Baid and Agarwal with interest.[1] The authors have highlighted the hazards of the powder in the gloves and the need for a ban of powdered gloves. Awareness of the harmful effects of powdered gloves among healthcare workers in Asia is still low. Powdered gloves usually contain cornstarch powder which is added as a donning agent. The powder adsorbs the latex particles and behaves as a carrier, which predisposes to allergy.[2] The amount of powder used in gloves varies. Some of the gloves used in hospitals and health centres in India have very high powder content [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Powder on the hand of the operator after removing the powdered latex glove

Powder on the hand of the operator after removing the powdered latex glove Alternatives to powdered latex gloves [Figure 2a] include nonpowdered latex gloves [Figure 2b] and nonlatex gloves. The various types of gloves are listed in [Table 1]. Nonpowdered latex gloves are a suitable alternative for healthcare workers who do not have latex allergy. Sterile nitrile gloves are not widely available. Nitrile and vinyl gloves are usually used in nonsterile setting. Nitrile gloves [Figure 2c] are highly resistant to tear. They are usually blue or black in color, and if there is a needle puncture, it is easily visible. Vinyl gloves (not shown) are usually transparent and fit loosely. For people with latex allergy, sterile nitrile gloves are the glove of choice; vinyl gloves can be worn in nonsterile environment and when handling nonhazardous material.
Figure 2

Various types of gloves available in the market (a) powdered latex gloves, (b) nonpowdered latex gloves which can be dark brown or yellow, (c) nitrile gloves (usually blue)

Table 1

Attributes of various types of gloves

Type of glovesAdvantagesDisadvantages
Powdered latex glovesFits very wellPowder is harmful to patients as well as healthcare workers
Very good tactile perception during procedures
Cost-effectiveBanned in few countries (USA, UK, Germany)
Elastic
Useful in high-risk situations
Biodegradable
Nonpowdered latex glovesMoulds wellFriction while wearing
Good tactile perceptionCannot be worn by people with latex allergy
Elastic
Useful in high-risk situations
Biodegradable
Nitrile glovesLatex free (so can be worn in people with latex allergy)Less elastic
Moulds well to fingersSterile nitrile gloves are not widely available and are more expensive compared to latex
Puncture resistant
Blue or black so any damage can be clearly visualizedNot biodegradable
Useful in high-risk situations
Vinyl glovesLatex freeNot useful for sterile environment and handling infectious materials
Useful for nonsterile environment and handling nonhazardous substances
Cheap
Various types of gloves available in the market (a) powdered latex gloves, (b) nonpowdered latex gloves which can be dark brown or yellow, (c) nitrile gloves (usually blue) Attributes of various types of gloves

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Dangers of cornstarch powder on medical gloves: seeking a solution.

Authors:  Richard F Edlich; William B Long; Dean K Gubler; George T Rodeheaver; John G Thacker; Lise Borel; Margot E Chase; Allyson L Fisher; Shelley S Mason; Kant Y Lin; Mary J Cox; Robert D Zura
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Powdered gloves: Time to bid adieu.

Authors:  R Baid; R Agarwal
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Current Interventions for COVID-19 Prevention.

Authors:  Deepak Pradhan; Prativa Biswasroy; Pradeep Kumar Naik; Goutam Ghosh; Goutam Rath
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.235

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.