Literature DB >> 29386302

Does Routine Bioimpedance-Guided Fluid Management Provide Additional Benefit to Non-Anuric Peritoneal Dialysis Patients? Results from COMPASS Clinical Trial.

Kook-Hwan Oh1, Seon Ha Baek2, Kwon-Wook Joo1, Dong Ki Kim1, Yon Su Kim1, Sejoong Kim2, Yun Kyu Oh3, Byoung Geun Han4, Jae Hyun Chang5, Wookyung Chung5, Ki Young Na6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, volume overload is related to cardiac dysfunction and mortality, while intravascular volume depletion is associated with a rapid decline in the residual renal function (RRF). This study sought to determine the clinical usefulness of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS)-guided fluid management for preserving RRF and cardiac function in PD patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label study that was conducted over a 1-year period (NCT01887262). Non-anuric (urine volume > 500 mL/day) subjects on PD were enrolled. Subjects in the control group received fluid management based on the clinical information alone. Those in the BIS group received BIS-guided fluid management along with clinical information.
RESULTS: The subjects (N = 137, mean age 51.3 ± 12.8 years, 54% male) were randomly assigned to the BIS group (n = 67) or to the control group (n = 70). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to age, sex ratio, cause of kidney failure, duration of PD, baseline comorbidity, RRF, PD method, or peritoneal transport type. At baseline, the 2 groups were not different in terms of RRF (glomerular filtration rate [GFR], 5.1 ± 2.9 vs 5.5 ± 3.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). After follow-up, changes in the GFR between the 2 groups were not different (-1.5 ± 2.4 vs -1.3 ± 2.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.593). Over the 1-year study period, both groups maintained stability of various fluid status parameters. Between the 2 groups, there were no differences in the net change of various fluid status parameters such as overhydration (OH) and extracellular water/total body water (ECW/TBW). A net change in ECW over 1 year was slightly but significantly higher in the control group (net increase, 0.57 ± 1.27 vs 0.05 ± 1.63 L, p = 0.047). However, this difference was not translated into an improvement in RRF in the BIS group. There were no differences in echocardiographic parameters or arterial stiffness at the end of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Routine BIS-guided fluid management in non-anuric PD patients did not provide additional benefit in volume control, RRF preservation, or cardiovascular (CV) parameters. However, our study cannot be generalized to the whole PD population. Further research is warranted in order to investigate the subpopulation of PD patients who may benefit from routine BIS-guided fluid management.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioimpedance; cardiovascular; euvolemia; peritoneal dialysis; residual renal function

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386302     DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  8 in total

1.  The Elusive Promise of Bioimpedance in Fluid Management of Patients Undergoing Dialysis.

Authors:  Simon J Davies
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy to Assess Volume Status in Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Frank M van der Sande; Esther R van de Wal-Visscher; Stefano Stuard; Ulrich Moissl; Jeroen P Kooman
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Bioimpedance spectroscopy for fluid status assessment in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis: Implications for peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schwaiger; Amrei Simon; Peter Wabel; Benjamin Schairer; Carolin Berner; Lorenzo Signorini; Matthäus Ernstbrunner; Rayko Evstatiev; Philipp Schwabl; Georg Hinterholzer; Florian Frommlet; Andreas Vychytil; Christian J Müller; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Using Tool-Assisted Target Weight Adjustments in Chronic Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  William Beaubien-Souligny; Loay Kontar; Daniel Blum; Josée Bouchard; André Y Denault; Ron Wald
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-07-12

5.  Effect of volume indices of bioimpedance analysis on clinical outcomes, including left ventricular hypertrophy, in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Jun Young Do
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-12

6.  Changes in extracellular water and left ventricular mass in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Theerasak Tangwonglert; Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-23

7.  Performance of Bioelectrical Impedance and Anthropometric Predictive Equations for Estimation of Muscle Mass in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Authors:  Natália Tomborelli Bellafronte; Lorena Vega-Piris; Guillermina Barril Cuadrado; Paula Garcia Chiarello
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-05-21

8.  The impact of volume overload on technique failure in incident peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  François Vrtovsnik; Christian Verger; Wim Van Biesen; Stanley Fan; Sug-Kyun Shin; Carmen Rodríguez; Isabel Garcia Méndez; Frank M van der Sande; Tatiana De Los Ríos; Katharina Ihle; Adelheid Gauly; Claudio Ronco; James Heaf
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-12-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.