Literature DB >> 29386064

The growth and evolution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a 20-year history of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) annual scientific sessions.

Daniel C Lee1,2, Michael Markl3,4, Erica Dall'Armellina5, Yuchi Han6, Sebastian Kozerke7, Titus Kuehne8, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin9, Daniel Messroghli8, Amit Patel10, Tobias Schaeffter11,12, Orlando Simonetti13, Anne Marie Valente14, Jonathan W Weinsaft15, Graham Wright16, Stefan Zimmerman17, Jeanette Schulz-Menger18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to summarize cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) research trends and highlights presented at the annual Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) scientific sessions over the past 20 years.
METHODS: Scientific programs from all SCMR Annual Scientific Sessions from 1998 to 2017 were obtained. SCMR Headquarters also provided data for the number and the country of origin of attendees and the number of accepted abstracts according to type. Data analysis included text analysis (key word extraction) and visualization by 'word clouds' representing the most frequently used words in session titles for 5-year intervals. In addition, session titles were sorted into 17 major subject categories to further evaluate research and clinical CMR trends over time.
RESULTS: Analysis of SCMR annual scientific sessions locations, attendance, and number of accepted abstracts demonstrated substantial growth of CMR research and clinical applications. As an international field of study, significant growth of CMR was documented by a strong increase in SCMR scientific session attendance (> 500%, 270 to 1406 from 1998 to 2017, number of accepted abstracts (> 700%, 98 to 701 from 1998 to 2018) and number of international participants (42-415% increase for participants from Asia, Central and South America, Middle East and Africa in 2004-2017). 'Word clouds' based evaluation of research trends illustrated a shift from early focus on 'MRI technique feasibility' to new established techniques (e.g. late gadolinium enhancement) and their clinical applications and translation (key words 'patient', 'disease') and more recently novel techniques and quantitative CMR imaging (key words 'mapping', 'T1', 'flow', 'function'). Nearly every topic category demonstrated an increase in the number of sessions over the 20-year period with 'Clinical Practice' leading all categories. Our analysis identified three growth areas 'Congenital', 'Clinical Practice', and 'Structure/function/flow'.
CONCLUSION: The analysis of the SCMR historical archives demonstrates a healthy and internationally active field of study which continues to undergo substantial growth and expansion into new and emerging CMR topics and clinical application areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archives; CMR; Cardiac; Heart; History; SCMR; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386064      PMCID: PMC5791345          DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0429-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


Background

On February 3, 2017, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) celebrated its 20th Annual Scientific Sessions in Washington D.C. Over the past 20 years, the field of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has witnessed major advancements in data acquisition speed, image quality and development of novel imaging techniques [1-11], application of CMR to a broader range of cardiovascular diseases [12-25], and the incorporation into consensus statements [26-34] and clinical practice guidelines [26, 35–39]. On the direction of the SCMR Executive Committee, the SCMR Science Committee sought to evaluate research trends in CMR by evaluating session titles from SCMR Annual Scientific Sessions Programs over the past 20 years. Our goal was to track the number of abstracts and scientific contributions, analyze the evolution of research trends and hot topics, and identify the changes in main clinical focus areas and application areas over the past 20 years.

Methods

Data acquisition

Scientific programs from all SCMR Annual Scientific Sessions from 1998 to 2017 were obtained from the SCMR Headquarters Office and SCMR members. Digital program files were available for 2000–2017, while programs of the 1998 and 1999 annual scientific sessions were only available in paper form. SCMR Headquarters also provided data for number of attendees, country of origin of attendees (only available for 2004–2017) and number of accepted abstracts according to type (available for 1998–2018): oral, poster, walking poster, e-poster, moderated poster, and pre-conference workshop. In addition, the ratio of attendance / (number of accepted abstracts) was calculated.

Data analysis

Session titles were abstracted from all programs and collated by year. Digital text analysis and visualization was performed using voyant-tools.org. The tool was used to visualize research and clinical trends by creating ‘word clouds’ representing the most frequently used key words in session titles in 5-year intervals. Common key words found in many session titles such as ‘MRI’, ‘CMR’, ‘cardiac’, and ‘MR’ were excluded from the analysis. To further evaluate research and clinical CMR trends over time, session titles were analyzed and subsequently manually sorted into 17 major subject categories. Title counts were grouped into four-year time periods: 1998–2001, 2002–2005, 2006–2009, 2010–2013, 2014–2017. The evolution of these major subject categories was sub-divided into “super growth” (an absolute increase of ≥ 8 sessions from the first time period to the last), and “strong growth” (an absolute increase of ≥ 4 sessions from the first time period to the last). In addition, new categories were defined as those that did not have any sessions in the first time period.

Results

SCMR annual scientific sessions 1998–2017: Location, attendance, abstracts

The dynamics and substantial growth of CMR research and applications are reflected in the evolution of SCMR annual scientific sessions locations and duration (Table 1), scientific session title pages from 1998 to 2017 (Fig. 1), and by the overall annual scientific sessions attendees, number of accepted abstracts over the past 20 years, and attendee / accepted abstracts ratio (Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3). Figure 1 shows side-by-side comparisons of selected title pages of all 20 past SCMR annual scientific sessions. Style and illustrations reflect choices and preferences by the local organizers, scientific program committee, and SCMR board at the time of the annual scientific sessions. Nevertheless, tracking the temporal evolution of CMR images used for each title page provide an illustration of a trend from basic to advanced CMR methods.
Table 1

SCMR scientific session duration, annual scientific sessions location, and number of annual scientific sessions attendees 1998–2018

SCMR annual scientific sessions
YearDuration [Days]Location - CityLocation - CountryAttendance
19983Atlanta, GeorgiaUSAN/A
19993Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA270
20003Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA291
20013Atlanta, GeorgiaUSA515
20023Lake Buena Vista, FloridaUSA704
20033Orlando, FloridaUSA850
20043BarcelonaSpain678
20053San Francisco, CaliforniaUSA940
20063Miami, FloridaUSA824
20073RomeItaly879
20084Los Angeles, CaliforniaUSA1107
20094Orlando, FloridaUSA1074
20104Phoenix, ArizonaUSA1150
20114NiceFrance1117
20124Orlando, FloridaUSA1258
20135San Francisco, CaliforniaUSA1183
20144New Orleans, LouisianaUSA1226
20154NiceFrance1451
20164Los Angeles, CaliforniaUSA1305
20174Washington DCUSA1406
20184BarcelonaSpainN/A

DC District of Columbia, USA United States of America

Fig. 1

SCMR scientific sessions title pages from 1998 to 2017 illustrating a trend from basic to advanced CMR methods

Table 2

Number of attendees of SCMR scientific session by country of origin

20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017AverageAverage IAverage IIChange [%]
BarcelonaSFMiamiRomeLAOrlandoPhoenixNiceOrlandoSFNew Orl.NiceLAWash DC2004–20172004–20102011–2017II vs. I
Country
United States371653509314690635513297575606634344806720 547.6 526.4568.9 8
United Kingdom724949100868384170114164124299105143 117.3 74.7159.9 114
Germany82815012910367581225977581517464 83.9 81.486.4 6
Canada924343882695245759377507590 58.1 44.072.1 64
Netherlands572915715055361023840441083045 51.4 44.758.1 30
Sweden2318143226132333323126423039 27.3 21.333.3 56
Switzerland288132722151042242123551916 23.1 17.628.6 63
France221061348848141218571527 18.7 10.127.3 169
Japan714101822292115152012202116 17.1 17.317.0 −2
Italy1498471012738790311512 15.6 15.316.0 5
Australia/NZ145413125102415218281211 13.0 9.017.0 89
Brazil/Colombia/Chile/Argentina11511881451421148191622 12.6 8.916.3 84
Spain75461731282231631 10.2 15.45.0 − 68
Belgium177520443151421813 7.4 8.66.3 −27
China/Hong Kong4501632112111101813 6.2 3.09.4 214
South Korea22524910737615104 6.1 4.97.4 53
Austria60416332140301200 4.5 4.94.1 −15
UAE3002500152042432 4.3 1.47.1 400
Norway123176124422832 4.1 4.63.6 −22
Greece60484428323822 4.0 4.04.0 0
Portugal60015200141121400 3.9 3.34.6 39
Mexico435310432533423 3.9 4.63.1 −31
Denmark102041138224613 3.4 3.03.7 24
Poland0108010215010500 3.0 3.03.0 0
Singapore/Malaysia311501151101001 2.1 1.72.6 50
Taiwan/Thailand11001333242321 1.9 1.32.4 89
Israel02000106100626 1.7 0.43.0 600
Hungary50042004000302 1.4 1.61.3 −18
Finland10020305000900 1.4 0.92.0 133
South Africa00100001022427 1.4 0.12.6 1700
India00023000221432 1.4 0.72.0 180
Ireland10010202400302 1.1 0.61.6 175
Turkey0121200010220 0.8 0.90.8 −3
Egypt00000000010413 0.6 0.01.3 100
Czech Repulic00000001001100 0.2 0.00.4 40
Russia00000000100200 0.2 0.00.4 40
Iceland00000010000100 0.1 0.10.1 0
Indonesia00000000000001 0.1 0.00.1 10
Armenia00000000000100 0.1 0.00.1 10
Bulgaria00000000000100 0.1 0.00.1 10
Region
United States & Canada380677543352772704565342650699711394881810 605.7 570.4641.0 12
Europe437221175521326282243652306371309850298361 382.3 315.0449.6 43
Asia1723162836453741254522625438 34.9 28.941.0 42
Central & South America15816111818816261711231825 16.4 13.419.4 45
Australia/NZ145413125102415218281211 13.0 9.017.0 89
Middle East & Africa333371022346401018 8.8 2.914.7 415

LA Los Angeles, NZ New Zealand, SF San Francisco, UAE United Arab Emirates

Fig. 2

20-year evolution of SCMR annual scientific session attendance and number of accepted abstracts to be presented at the SCMR scientific sessions. Sustained growths of both annual scientific sessions attendance and scientific contributions are clearly evident. The attendance number of the 2018 meeting were not available at the time of this analysis

Fig. 3

a Changes in number of accepted abstracts by type over the past 20 years. b Relationship between number of SCMR annual scientific session attendees and number of accepted abstracts. c Development of ratio of attendance vs. accepted abstract over the past 20 years

SCMR scientific session duration, annual scientific sessions location, and number of annual scientific sessions attendees 1998–2018 DC District of Columbia, USA United States of America SCMR scientific sessions title pages from 1998 to 2017 illustrating a trend from basic to advanced CMR methods Number of attendees of SCMR scientific session by country of origin LA Los Angeles, NZ New Zealand, SF San Francisco, UAE United Arab Emirates 20-year evolution of SCMR annual scientific session attendance and number of accepted abstracts to be presented at the SCMR scientific sessions. Sustained growths of both annual scientific sessions attendance and scientific contributions are clearly evident. The attendance number of the 2018 meeting were not available at the time of this analysis a Changes in number of accepted abstracts by type over the past 20 years. b Relationship between number of SCMR annual scientific session attendees and number of accepted abstracts. c Development of ratio of attendance vs. accepted abstract over the past 20 years Significant growth of CMR research and clinical applications is corroborated by the consistent and strong increase of SCMR scientific session attendance and abstracts which document a > 500% growth in attendance (270 attendees in 1999 to 1406 in 2017) and a > 700% increase in the number of accepted abstracts (98 in 1998 to 701 in 2018). A more detailed breakdown of annual scientific sessions abstracts (oral and poster presentations) according to type is shown in Fig. 3 and illustrates that the growing number of contributions led to the creation of new categories (walking poster, e-poster, moderated poster) in recent years. As expected, a strong and significant relationship exists between the number SCMR annual scientific sessions attendees and abstract submissions (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, the attendance / accepted abstracts ratio varied considerably during early years (range from 1.1 to 4.5) but has stabilized over the past 7 years, ranging between 2.0 and 2.5. Table 2 shows a detailed breakdown of SCMR annual scientific sessions attendees by country of origin over the past 14 years (2004–2017). There was a steady overall increase in international participation at the SCMR annual scientific sessions if average attendance in early (2004–2010) and more recent (2010–2017) time periods for the available data are compared; 570 to 641 (12% increase) for attendees from the United States and Canada, 315 to 450 for Europe (43% increase), 29 to 41 for Asia (42% increase), 13 to 19 for Central and South America (45% increase), 9 to 17 for Australia and New Zealand (89% increase), and 3 to 15 for Africa and Middle East (415% increase). As expected, SCMR annual scientific sessions held in Europe (2004, 2007, 2011, 2015) were characterized by an increase of European attendees compared to SCMR scientific sessions in the United States (see Table 2).

Research and clinical trends: Key Word Extraction & Word Clouds

Word clouds summarizing the results of key word extraction from SCMR annual scientific sessions titles are shown in Fig. 4. Results represent the most frequently used words in session titles (increase size indicated more frequent use) for four 5-year periods. Comparison of the temporal evolution of the word clouds over the past 20 years illustrates a topical shift from ‘CMR centric’ to ‘disease centric’. Initially, in years 1–5 (Fig. 4a) CMR techniques and their feasibility, the exploration of different application areas, and questions related to reimbursement were at the center of the SCMR annual scientific sessions. Subsequently, prominent key words such as ‘ischemic’ and ‘enhancement’ document the increasing importance of late gadolinium enhancement (Fig. 4b and c). In the past 10 years (Fig. 4c and d), the focus has shifted to clinical applications and translation (key words ‘patient’, ‘disease’, ‘congenital’, are more central). Finally, during the last 5 years (Fig. 4d), the corresponding word cloud reveals a renewed interest in novel techniques and quantitative CMR imaging techniques (more apparent role of key words ‘mapping’, ‘T1’, ‘flow’, ‘function’).
Fig. 4

Word clouds visualizing the frequency of words used in SCMR scientific session titles over the past 20 years. Session titles were grouped in 5-year intervals and represent most frequently used words in SCMR session titles from 1998 to 2002 (a), 2003–2007 (b), 2008–2012 (c), and 2013–2017 (d). Word clouds were created using Voyant Tools (http://voyant-tools.org/)

Word clouds visualizing the frequency of words used in SCMR scientific session titles over the past 20 years. Session titles were grouped in 5-year intervals and represent most frequently used words in SCMR session titles from 1998 to 2002 (a), 2003–2007 (b), 2008–2012 (c), and 2013–2017 (d). Word clouds were created using Voyant Tools (http://voyant-tools.org/)

CMR research trends and highlights at SCMR scientific sessions over the past 20 Years

The number of sessions within all major subject categories over the past 20 years are depicted in Fig. 5a. Between the first time period (1998–2001) and the last (2014–2017), there was an increase in the number of sessions for every category except metabolism. The subject categories Clinical Practice, Congenital, Imaging Techniques, Heart Failure/Cardiomyopathy, and Structure/Function/Flow demonstrated “super growth” (Fig. 5b). The largest increase was seen in Congenital. Clinical practice had the most sessions in four of the five time periods. This category included sessions focusing on clinical cases, career development, global CMR, efficiency, safety, and cost. The category Structure/Function/Flow which has traditionally few sessions experienced “super growth” in the last time period due to sessions on strain, diastolic function, the right ventricle, and 4D flow. The subject categories Ischemic Heart Disease, Clinical Trials/Outcomes, Coronary/Vascular, and Basic/Translational demonstrated “strong growth” (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 5

a Number of SCMR scientific session titles within major subject categories - trends over 20 years. b SCMR scientific session subject categories demonstrating “Super Growth” – defined as absolute growth ≥ 8 session titles over a 20-year time span. c SCMR scientific session subject categories demonstrating “Growth” – defined as absolute growth ≥ 4 session titles over a 20-year time span. d Several SCMR scientific session subject categories did not exist in the first time period, but exhibited significant growth in recent years

a Number of SCMR scientific session titles within major subject categories - trends over 20 years. b SCMR scientific session subject categories demonstrating “Super Growth” – defined as absolute growth ≥ 8 session titles over a 20-year time span. c SCMR scientific session subject categories demonstrating “Growth” – defined as absolute growth ≥ 4 session titles over a 20-year time span. d Several SCMR scientific session subject categories did not exist in the first time period, but exhibited significant growth in recent years New categories (those that did not have any sessions in the first time period) include Electrophysiology, Tissue Characterization, Analysis/Post-processing, Interventional, and Clinical Application to Special Groups (Fig. 5d). This last category includes titles such as “Phenotyping and Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy”, “Assessing the Hematology/Oncology Patient”, and “Cardiovascular Disease in Women – CMR’s Essential Role”. Case sessions also saw significant growth in number and sophistication. From 1998 to 2001 there was a single case session offered, “Clinical Case Review Session: Bring Your Own”. From 2014 to 2017, there were 39 case sessions offered, including a live interventional CMR heart catheterization case presented by Children’s National Medical Center at the most recent SCMR annual scientific sessions in 2017. The first SCMR live case (real-time CMR-guided cardiac catheterization in an atrial septal defect patient) was a unique experience for the SCMR audience and a milestone in the history of the SCMR annual scientific sessions. SCMR attendees were provided with the opportunity to watch a clinical CMR catheterization program live in operation and recognize potential benefits of interventional CMR for pediatric and adult patients.

Discussion

The results of our analysis of SCMR annual scientific sessions attendance, number and type of abstracts, as well as CMR research and application trends clearly demonstrated a healthy and internationally active field of study which continues to undergo substantial growth and expansion utilizing new and emerging CMR techniques to answer a broadening array of clinical questions. Changes in annual scientific sessions location and annual scientific sessions duration summarized in Table 1 are clear indications of CMR as a growing and international field of study. Initially varying attendees to accepted abstract ratio has stabilized in recent years above 2 indicating a strong and consistent interest in the SCMR annual scientific sessions also for clinicians and scientists who did not submit an abstract. These findings are supported by our key word extraction analysis which illustrated a shift from early focus on ‘MRI techniques and ‘feasibility’ to patient centered clinical translation and more recently novel techniques and quantitative CMR imaging. These changes were accompanied by a dramatic increase in the number of sessions from 46 in 1998–2001 to 168 in 2014–2017. Nearly every topic category demonstrated an increase in the number of sessions from the first time period to the last. Clinical Practice led all categories in four of the five time periods. The top three growth areas were Congenital, Clinical Practice, and Structure/function/flow. In many sessions, growth mirrored the development of new imaging techniques or therapies. Tissue characterization has seen substantial growth since mapping techniques have become widely available. The advent of percutaneous valve techniques has coincided with the emergence of sessions dedicated to valve disease. Arrhythmias and CMR used to be mutually exclusive terms, but with real time techniques and recognition of the utility of CMR for defining the substrate for arrhythmias this area has blossomed. The “super growth” in the congenital category is not surprising, given the increasing role of CMR in this growing patient population. The category “Clinical Application to Special Groups” illustrates the growing application of CMR beyond traditional atherosclerotic coronary and vascular disease.

Conclusion

We’ve seen the programs evolve from very broad sessions with a focus on development and validation, to a wide breadth of sessions that build upon the past and focus increasingly on specific applications to patient scenarios and groups where CMR might impact clinical care and practice guidelines. In this context, a continued collaboration between non-clinician PhD scientists and engineers and physician researchers and clinicians coupled with interactions with other clinically oriented societies will be critical for the continued success of CMR. The evolution of sessions at the SCMR annual scientific sessions mirrors the growth and maturation of the science and clinical practice of CMR over the past 20 years.
  39 in total

1.  How we perform delayed enhancement imaging.

Authors:  Raymond J Kim; Dipan J Shah; Robert M Judd
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Meeting highlights of the 10th annual scientific sessions of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and 6th annual meeting of the Working Group for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of the European Society of Cardiology: Rome, Italy, February 2-4, 2007.

Authors:  Matthias G Friedrich; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel K Sodickson; Scott D Flamm; Peter Buser; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  MRI temporal acceleration techniques.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tsao; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of primary tumors of the heart: A review.

Authors:  David S Fieno; Rola Saouaf; Louise E J Thomson; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 5.  Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07

6.  Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.

Authors:  Damian J Tyler; Lucy E Hudsmith; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Peter Weale; Stefan Neubauer; Kieran Clarke; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Representation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the AHA / ACC guidelines.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Guenter Pilz; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Chirine Parsai; Rory O'Hanlon; Sanjay K Prasad; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  5 in total

1.  Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 2 and Extracellular Volume Fraction in Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shaomin Yang; Haixiong Chen; Kuan Tan; Fusheng Cai; Yongxing Du; Weibiao Lv; Qiugen Hu; Yunzhao Hu; Yuli Huang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.543

2.  Verification of threshold for image intensity ratio analyses of late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of left atrial fibrosis in 1.5T scans.

Authors:  Litten Bertelsen; Francisco Alarcón; Laura Andreasen; Eva Benito; Morten Salling Olesen; Niels Vejlstrup; Lluis Mont; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Sustainable low-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance in changing healthcare systems.

Authors:  Cathy Qin; Sanjana Murali; Elsa Lee; Vaishnavi Supramaniam; Derek J Hausenloy; Johnes Obungoloch; Joanna Brecher; Rongyu Lin; Hao Ding; Theophilus N Akudjedu; Udunna C Anazodo; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Orlando P Simonetti; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Thoralf Niendorf; Regina Mammen; Sola Adeleke
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

Review 4.  Radiotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: The Role of Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Tomaž Podlesnikar; Boštjan Berlot; Jure Dolenc; Katja Goričar; Tanja Marinko
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 5.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.

Authors:  Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.364

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.