Literature DB >> 29385839

Examining sensory ability, feature matching and assessment-based adaptation for a brain-computer interface using the steady-state visually evoked potential.

Jonathan S Brumberg1, Anh Nguyen2, Kevin M Pitt1, Sean D Lorenz3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated how overt visual attention and oculomotor control influence successful use of a visual feedback brain-computer interface (BCI) for accessing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices in a heterogeneous population of individuals with profound neuromotor impairments. BCIs are often tested within a single patient population limiting generalization of results. This study focuses on examining individual sensory abilities with an eye toward possible interface adaptations to improve device performance.
METHODS: Five individuals with a range of neuromotor disorders participated in four-choice BCI control task involving the steady state visually evoked potential. The BCI graphical interface was designed to simulate a commercial AAC device to examine whether an integrated device could be used successfully by individuals with neuromotor impairment.
RESULTS: All participants were able to interact with the BCI and highest performance was found for participants able to employ an overt visual attention strategy. For participants with visual deficits to due to impaired oculomotor control, effective performance increased after accounting for mismatches between the graphical layout and participant visual capabilities.
CONCLUSION: As BCIs are translated from research environments to clinical applications, the assessment of BCI-related skills will help facilitate proper device selection and provide individuals who use BCI the greatest likelihood of immediate and long term communicative success. Overall, our results indicate that adaptations can be an effective strategy to reduce barriers and increase access to BCI technology. These efforts should be directed by comprehensive assessments for matching individuals to the most appropriate device to support their complex communication needs. Implications for Rehabilitation Brain computer interfaces using the steady state visually evoked potential can be integrated with an augmentative and alternative communication device to provide access to language and literacy for individuals with neuromotor impairment. Comprehensive assessments are needed to fully understand the sensory, motor, and cognitive abilities of individuals who may use brain-computer interfaces for proper feature matching as selection of the most appropriate device including optimization device layouts and control paradigms. Oculomotor impairments negatively impact brain-computer interfaces that use the steady state visually evoked potential, but modifications to place interface stimuli and communication items in the intact visual field can improve successful outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAC; Brain-computer interface (BCI); SSVEP; feature matching; steady-state visually evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385839      PMCID: PMC6068003          DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  44 in total

1.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates.

Authors:  Ming Cheng; Xiaorong Gao; Shangkai Gao; Dingfeng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain.

Authors:  M M Müller; S Andersen; N J Trujillo; P Valdés-Sosa; P Malinowski; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  F Lotte; M Congedo; A Lécuyer; F Lamarche; B Arnaldi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Brendan Z Allison; Dennis J McFarland; Gerwin Schalk; Shi Dong Zheng; Melody Moore Jackson; Jonathan R Wolpaw
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Performance variation in motor imagery brain-computer interface: a brief review.

Authors:  Minkyu Ahn; Sung Chan Jun
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Toward independent home use of brain-computer interfaces: a decision algorithm for selection of potential end-users.

Authors:  Andrea Kübler; Elisa Mira Holz; Eric W Sellers; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  A practical, intuitive brain-computer interface for communicating 'yes' or 'no' by listening.

Authors:  N Jeremy Hill; Erin Ricci; Sameah Haider; Lynn M McCane; Susan Heckman; Jonathan R Wolpaw; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  The diagnosis of stupor and coma.

Authors:  F Plum; J B Posner
Journal:  Contemp Neurol Ser       Date:  1972

Review 9.  Motor imagery and EEG-based control of spelling devices and neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Christa Neuper; Gernot R Müller-Putz; Reinhold Scherer; Gert Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Attention and P300-based BCI performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Angela Riccio; Luca Simione; Francesca Schettini; Alessia Pizzimenti; Maurizio Inghilleri; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Donatella Mattia; Febo Cincotti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Human visual skills for brain-computer interface use: a tutorial.

Authors:  Melanie Fried-Oken; Michelle Kinsella; Betts Peters; Brandon Eddy; Bruce Wojciechowski
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 2.  Guidelines for Feature Matching Assessment of Brain-Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Workshops of the Seventh International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Not Getting Lost in Translation.

Authors:  Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Erik Aarnoutse; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Steven Bedrick; Walter Besio; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Jennifer L Collinger; An H Do; Christian Herff; Matthias Hohmann; Michelle Kinsella; Kyuhwa Lee; Fabien Lotte; Gernot Müller-Putz; Anton Nijholt; Elmar Pels; Betts Peters; Felix Putze; Rüdiger Rupp; Gerwin Schalk; Stephanie Scott; Michael Tangermann; Paul Tubig; Thorsten Zander
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2019-12-10

4.  Considering Augmentative and Alternative Communication Research for Brain-Computer Interface Practice.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg; Adrienne R Pitt
Journal:  Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits       Date:  2019

5.  Optimising the classification of feature-based attention in frequency-tagged electroencephalography data.

Authors:  Angela I Renton; David R Painter; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 8.501

6.  Behind the Scenes of Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Review of Electroencephalography Signals, How They Are Recorded, and Why They Matter.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg; Jeremy D Burnison; Jyutika Mehta; Juhi Kidwai
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-11-09

7.  A systematic review of research on augmentative and alternative communication brain-computer interface systems for individuals with disabilities.

Authors:  Betts Peters; Brandon Eddy; Deirdre Galvin-McLaughlin; Gail Betz; Barry Oken; Melanie Fried-Oken
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.473

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.