Literature DB >> 29385609

Dietary protein reduction on microbial protein, amino acid digestibility, and body retention in beef cattle: 2. Amino acid intestinal absorption and their efficiency for whole-body deposition.

L D S Mariz1, P M Amaral1, S C Valadares Filho1, S A Santos2, E Detmann1, M I Marcondes1, J M V Pereira1, J M Silva Júnior1, L F Prados1, A P Faciola3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the apparent and true intestinal digestibility of total and individual AA, and to estimate the efficiency of whole-body AA retention from individual and total absorbed AA. Four Nellore animals (241.3 kg initial BW) and four crossbred Angus × Nellore (263.4 kg initial BW) cannulated in rumen and ileum were randomly allocated in two 4 × 4 Latin squares. The experiment lasted four 17 d periods, with 10 d for adaptation to diets and another 7 d for data collection. The diets consisted of increasing CP levels: 100, 120, or 140 g/kg of DM offered ad libitum, and restricted intake diet with 120 g CP/kg DM (experiment 1). In experiment 2, forty-four bulls (22 Nellore and 22 crossbred F1 Angus × Nellore) with 8 months and initial shrunk BW 215.0 ± 15.0 kg (Nellore = 208.0 ± 12.78 kg; Angus × Nellore = 221.9 ± 14.16 kg) were used. Eight of those animals were slaughtered at the beginning of the experiment. The remaining 36 bulls were allocated in a completely randomized design with six replicates, in a 2 (genetic groups) × 3 (CP contents) factorial scheme. The amount of essential AA (EAA) and nonessential AA (NEAA) reaching the small intestine increased linearly (P < 0.05) in response to CP content. The apparent digestibility of EAA was not affected (P > 0.05) by CP content, with exception for histidine (P = 0.07, linear effect), leucine (P = 0.01, linear effect), and methionine (P = 0.05, linear effect). Differences existed among AA when compared the apparent digestibility of NEAA. The apparent digestibility of alanine (P = 0.05), aspartic acid (P = 0.07), glutamic acid (P = 0.02), glycine (P = 0.05), proline (P = 0.02), and serine (P = 0.04) responded quadratically to CP content increase. However, the apparent digestibility of cystine and tyrosine was not affected (P > 0.05) by increasing dietary CP. The true intestinal digestibilities of total, essential, nonessential AA, lysine, and methionine were 75.0%, 77.0%, 74.0%, 77.0%, and 86%, respectively. The true intestinal digestibility of total microbial AA was 80%. The efficiency of utilization of total AA for whole-body protein deposition was 40%. The efficiency of utilization of lysine and methionine was 37% and 58%, respectively. It was concluded that the AA flow to the omasum increases in response to dietary CP content. In addition, there are differences among AA in the efficiency that they are used by beef cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385609      PMCID: PMC6140959          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

Review 1.  Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows.

Authors:  J H Clark; T H Klusmeyer; M R Cameron
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Estimation of rumen outflow in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets by use of reticular sampling as an alternative to sampling from the omasal canal.

Authors:  S J Krizsan; S Ahvenjärvi; H Volden; G A Broderick
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Assessment of intestinal amino acid availability in cattle by use of the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.

Authors:  E Titgemeyer; N Merchen; Y Han; C Parsons; D Baker
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  The digestibility of amino acids in the small intestine of the sheep.

Authors:  M V Tas; R A Evans; R F Axford
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Amino acid profile and intestinal digestibility in dairy cows of rumen-undegradable protein from various feedstuffs.

Authors:  L J Erasmus; P M Botha; C W Cruywagen; H H Meissner
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 1. Large-scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen micro-organisms.

Authors:  E Storm; E R Orskov
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Omasal sampling technique for assessing fermentative digestion in the forestomach of dairy cows.

Authors:  P Huhtanen; P G Brotz; L D Satter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Markers for quantifying microbial protein synthesis in the rumen.

Authors:  G A Broderick; N R Merchen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Methionine as a methyl group donor in growing cattle.

Authors:  C A Löest; E C Titgemeyer; G St-jean; D C Van Metret; J S Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Rumen Degradability and Small Intestinal Digestibility of the Amino Acids in Four Protein Supplements.

Authors:  Y Wang; L Jin; Q N Wen; N K Kopparapu; J Liu; X L Liu; Y G Zhang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.509

View more
  9 in total

1.  Odd-chain fatty acids as an alternative method to predict ruminal microbial nitrogen flow of feedlot Nellore steers fed grain-based diets supplemented with different nitrogen sources.

Authors:  Letícia M Campos; Vinícius C Souza; Yury T Granja-Salcedo; Juliana D Messana; Jacquelyn M Prestegaard-Wilson; Maria Júlia G Ganga; Ana Veronica L Dias; Vladimir E Costa; Telma T Berchielli
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Dynamic Alterations in Yak Rumen Bacteria Community and Metabolome Characteristics in Response to Feed Type.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Hao Wu; Shujie Liu; Shatuo Chai; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  The Effects of Decreasing Dietary Crude Protein on the Growth Performance, Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality of Finishing Charolais Bulls.

Authors:  Martina Cortese; Severino Segato; Igino Andrighetto; Nicola Ughelini; Maria Chinello; Eliana Schiavon; Giorgio Marchesini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Residual feed intake divergence during the preweaning period is associated with unique hindgut microbiome and metabolome profiles in neonatal Holstein heifer calves.

Authors:  Ahmed Elolimy; Abdulrahman Alharthi; Mohamed Zeineldin; Claudia Parys; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-20

5.  Rumen Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Hao Wu; Wanbao Chen; Chang Liu; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-25

6.  Multi-Omics Reveals That the Rumen Transcriptome, Microbiome, and Its Metabolome Co-regulate Cold Season Adaptability of Tibetan Sheep.

Authors:  Xiu Liu; Yuzhu Sha; Weibing Lv; Guizhong Cao; Xinyu Guo; Xiaoning Pu; Jiqing Wang; Shaobin Li; Jiang Hu; Yuzhu Luo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Small Intestine Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Chang Liu; Hao Wu; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  The effects of Clostridium butyricum on Ira rabbit growth performance, cecal microbiota and plasma metabolome.

Authors:  Xiao Xing Ye; Ke Yao Li; Ya Fei Li; Jia Ning Lu; Ping Ting Guo; Hao Yu Liu; Li Wen Zhou; Shuai Shuai Xue; Cai Yun Huang; Shao Ming Fang; Qian Fu Gan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.064

9.  Microbiome and Metabolomics Reveal the Effects of Different Feeding Systems on the Growth and Ruminal Development of Yaks.

Authors:  Chun Huang; Fei Ge; Xixi Yao; Xian Guo; Pengjia Bao; Xiaoming Ma; Xiaoyun Wu; Min Chu; Ping Yan; Chunnian Liang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.