Literature DB >> 29385601

Feed preference of weaned pigs fed diets containing soybean meal, Brassica napus canola meal, or Brassica juncea canola meal.

Jose L Landero1, Li Fang Wang1, Eduardo Beltranena1,2, Clover J Bench1, Ruurd T Zijlstra1.   

Abstract

Brassica napus and Brassica juncea canola meal (CM) may replace soybean meal (SBM) in pig diets, but differ in fiber, glucosinolates content and profile. Preference of weaned pigs provided double-choice selections to diets containing 20% SBM, B. napus CM, or B. juncea CM was evaluated in two studies. In experiment 1, 216 pigs (9.4 ± 1.6 kg initial BW) were housed in 27 pens of 8 pigs (four gilts and four barrows). In experiment 2, 144 pigs (8.9 ± 1.1 kg) were housed in 36 pens of 4 pigs (two gilts and two barrows). Pigs were offered three dietary choices: B. napus CM with SBM as reference (B. napus CM [SBM]), B. juncea CM with SBM as reference (B. juncea CM [SBM]), and B. juncea CM with B. napus CM as reference (B. juncea CM [B. napus CM]) in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square. Diets were formulated to provide 2.4 Mcal NE/kg and 4.5 g standardized ileal digestible Lys/Mcal NE and were balanced using canola oil and crystalline AA. Each pair of diets was offered in two self-feeders per pen as mash (experiment 1) or pellets (experiment 2) during three test-periods of 4-d, followed by a 3-d non-test period when a common diet was offered in both feeders. Feeders with different diets were rotated daily among pens during preference periods for both experiments, and feeder positions (right or left) were switched daily in experiment 2. Prior to the study and between periods, pigs were fed non-test diets containing SBM (experiment 1) or without test feedstuffs (experiment 2). Overall in both experiments, pigs preferred (P < 0.001) SBM over B. napus and B. juncea CM diets, and preferred (P < 0.001) B. napus over B. juncea CM diet. Dietary choice did not affect (P > 0.05) growth performance in both experiments, except for greater G:F (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the B. juncea CM [B. napus CM] diets than pigs fed the B. napus CM [SBM] or B. juncea CM [SBM] diets in experiment 1. In conclusion, weaned pigs preferred SBM over CM diets when given a choice, and preferred B. napus over the B. juncea diet that contained more total glucosinolates especially gluconapin. Weaned pigs fed the B. juncea CM [B. napus CM] diets in the double-choice selection did not reduce feed intake, weight gain, and G:F compared to pigs fed the B. napus CM [SBM] or B. juncea CM [SBM] diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385601      PMCID: PMC6140913          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

1.  Nutritional evaluation of low glucosinolate mustard meals (Brassica juncea) in broiler diets.

Authors:  R W Newkirk; H L Classen; R T Tyler
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Feed preference in pigs: effect of selected protein, fat, and fiber sources at different inclusion rates.

Authors:  D Solà-Oriol; E Roura; D Torrallardona
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The voluntary feed intake of pigs given feeds based on wheat bran, dried citrus pulp and grass meal, in relation to measurements of feed bulk.

Authors:  I Kyriazakis; G C Emmans
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 4.  Food preferences in farm animals: why don't they always choose wisely?

Authors:  J M Forbes; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.297

5.  Diet preference and meal patterns of weanling pigs offered diets containing either spray-dried porcine plasma or dried skim milk.

Authors:  P M Ermer; P S Miller; A J Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Semiquantitative analysis of 3-butenyl isothiocyanate to monitor an off-flavor in mustard seeds and glycosinolates screening for origin identification.

Authors:  Nancy Frank; Mathieu Dubois; Till Goldmann; Adrienne Tarres; Elke Schuster; Fabien Robert
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Determination of Sinapic Acid Derivatives in Canola Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Authors:  Rabie Khattab; Michael Eskin; Michel Aliani; Usha Thiyam
Journal:  J Am Oil Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 1.849

8.  Low-fiber canola. Part 1. Chemical and nutritive composition of the meal.

Authors:  Bogdan A Slominski; Wei Jia; Anna Rogiewicz; Charles M Nyachoti; Dave Hickling
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Effects of diet form and feeder adjustment on growth performance of nursery and finishing pigs.

Authors:  J E Nemechek; M D Tokach; S S Dritz; E D Fruge; E L Hansen; R D Goodband; J M DeRouchey; J C Woodworth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  The effect of protein source on the diets selected by pigs given a choice between a low and high protein food.

Authors:  I Kyriazakis; G C Emmans
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.