Literature DB >> 29385484

Life cycle efficiency of beef production: IX. Relationship between residual feed intake of heifers and cow efficiency ratios based on harvest, carcass, and wholesale cut weight outputs.

M E Davis1, P A Lancaster2, J J Rutledge3, L V Cundiff4.   

Abstract

Data were collected from 1953 through 1980 from identical and fraternal twin beef and dairy females born in 1953, 1954, 1959, 1964, and 1969, from crossbred females born as singles in 1974, and their progeny. Numbers of dams that weaned at least one calf and were included in the first analysis were 37, 45, and 56 in the 1964, 1969, and 1974 data sets, respectively. Respective numbers of dams that weaned three calves and were included in a second analysis were 6, 8, 8, 22, 33, and 33 in the 1953, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1969, and 1974 experiments. Individual feed consumption was measured at 28-d intervals from the time females were placed on the experiment at 240 d of age until three calves were weaned or the dams had reached 5 yr of age. Residual feed intake (RFI) and residual BW gain (RG) of heifers that subsequently became dams were determined based on ADG and DMI from 240 d of age to first calving. Various measures of cow efficiency were calculated on either a life cycle or actual lifetime basis using ratios of progeny and dam weight outputs to progeny and dam feed inputs. The correlation between RFI and DMI was large and positive (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001), and RG was highly correlated with ADG (r = 0.75; P < 0.0001). Correlations of RFI with cow efficiency ratios that included harvest weight, carcass weight, or weight of trimmed wholesale cuts as measures of output ranged from -0.05 (P > 0.10) to -0.17 (P < 0.10), indicating that heifers with better (i.e., more negative) RFI values tended to become slightly more efficient cows. Correlations of RG with life cycle and actual lifetime cow efficiency ratios ranged from 0.08 (P > 0.10) to 0.23 (P < 0.05), demonstrating that heifers with better (i.e., more positive) values for RG were somewhat more efficient as cows. The correlations were stronger when cow salvage value was included in the measures of cow efficiency. Correlations of DMI and mid-test metabolic BW (MMW) with life cycle cow efficiency ratios that did not include cow salvage value as output ranged from -0.15 (P < 0.10) to -0.22 (P < 0.01). Correlations of DMI and MMW with actual lifetime cow efficiency ratios varied from -0.20 (P < 0.05) to -0.36 (P < 0.001). Therefore, smaller heifers that consumed less feed had superior cow efficiency ratios. Correlations of RFI with carcass grade, backfat thickness, marbling score, and kidney fat of progeny indicated that heifers with superior RFI would tend to produce leaner offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385484      PMCID: PMC6140950          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Residual feed intake, body composition, and fertility in yearling beef heifers.

Authors:  K S Shaffer; P Turk; W R Wagner; E E D Felton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes.

Authors:  F C P Castro Bulle; P V Paulino; A C Sanches; R D Sainz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers.

Authors:  P A Lancaster; G E Carstens; D H Crews; T H Welsh; T D A Forbes; D W Forrest; L O Tedeschi; R D Randel; F M Rouquette
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.

Authors:  J J Crowley; M McGee; D A Kenny; D H Crews; R D Evans; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Life cycle efficiency of beef production: VIII. Relationship between residual feed intake of heifers and subsequent cow efficiency ratios.

Authors:  M E Davis; P A Lancaster; J J Rutledge; L V Cundiff
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Life cycle efficiency of beef production: I. Cow efficiency ratios for progeny weaned.

Authors:  M E Davis; J J Rutledge; L V Cundiff; E R Hauser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of breed composition on phenotypic residual feed intake and growth in Angus, Brahman, and Angus x Brahman crossbred cattle.

Authors:  M A Elzo; D G Riley; G R Hansen; D D Johnson; R O Myer; S W Coleman; C C Chase; J G Wasdin; J D Driver
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Efficiency of production and cow size in beef cattle.

Authors:  D D Kress; E R Hauser; A B Chapman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Relationships among performance, residual feed intake, and temperament assessed in growing beef heifers and subsequently as 3-year-old, lactating beef cows.

Authors:  T E Black; K M Bischoff; V R G Mercadante; G H L Marquezini; N Dilorenzo; C C Chase; S W Coleman; T D Maddock; G C Lamb
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; J A Basarab; Z Wang; C Li; M A Price; E K Okine; D H Crews; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  2 in total

1.  Residual feed intake in beef cattle and its association with carcass traits, ruminal solid-fraction bacteria, and epithelium gene expression.

Authors:  Ahmed A Elolimy; Mohamed K Abdelmegeid; Joshua C McCann; Daniel W Shike; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-24

2.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.