Literature DB >> 29385426

Outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement in acute Type A aortic dissection.

Hiroshi Tanaka1, Yuki Ikeno1, Noriyuki Abe1, Hiroaki Takahashi1, Takeshi Inoue1, Yutaka Okita1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term durability of aortic valves, we reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement with acute Type A aortic dissection.
METHODS: We included patients who underwent emergent aortic repair for acute Type A aortic dissection at our university hospital between 2000 and 2016. We identified patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement from the included cohort and assessed their survival and long-term valve durability.
RESULTS: We identified 24 of 328 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement (age: mean ± SD 49 ± 11 years; 17 men). All patients underwent reimplantation procedures and 2 had concomitant cusp repairs (central plication). Prolapsed cusps caused by detached commissures in 12 cases were noted and reattached with buttress sutures with or without glue. There was no in-hospital mortality. Median follow-up period was 84 months (range 1-202 months) and survival was 100% at 5 and 10 years. Freedom from moderate or greater aortic insufficiency was 82% ± 10% at 5 years and 65% ± 13% at 10 years. Freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 83% ± 9% at 5 years and 69% ± 12% at 10 years. Valve reoperations were indicated for endocarditis in 1 patient, perforation of the aortic cusp in 1 patient and redetachment of commissures that had been attached with gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue at the initial operations in 3 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The durability of valve-sparing root replacement in acute aortic dissection was suboptimal. The major cause of late failure was commissure detachment after primary repair with buttress sutures and glue. Gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue should be avoided for commissural resuspension in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385426     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

1.  Aortic root surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: indication might be the problem.

Authors:  Woon Heo; Suk-Won Song
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Outcomes of Liu's aortic root repair and valve preservation in patients with type A dissection and aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Hulin Piao; Yong Wang; Maoxun Huang; Zhicheng Zhu; Rihao Xu; Tiance Wang; Dan Li; Kexiang Liu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

3.  The David Operation Offers Shorter Hemostasis Time Than the Bentall in Case of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A.

Authors:  Ryohei Ushioda; Tomonori Shirasaka; Taro Kanamori; Atsuko Fujii; Makoto Shirakawa; Taro Takeuchi; Hiroyuki Kamiya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-30

4.  AORTLANTIC: French registry of aortic valve-sparing root replacement, preliminary multicentre results from western France.

Authors:  Clément Dubost; Jacques Tomasi; Antoine Ducroix; Kevin Pluchon; Pierre Escrig; Olivier Fouquet; Arthur Aupart; Alain Mirza; Imen Fellah; Eric Bezon; Christophe Baufreton; Jean Marc El Arid; Jean-Christian Roussel; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Thomas Senage
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.