Literature DB >> 29385270

Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins.

Isabella L K Clegg1,2, Fabienne Delfour1,2.   

Abstract

Many animals display a suite of increased vigilance and/or activity responses in relation to upcoming events, termed "anticipatory behavior." Anticipatory behavior toward positive events has been suggested as a cross-species measure of affective state as it likely reflects the balance of the reward-sensitivity system: various studies suggest that animals in poorer welfare situations show higher or excessive levels of anticipation for positive events. Another tool for evaluating animals' affective state is cognitive bias testing, and although it has been attempted, a link has not yet been made between cognitive bias and anticipatory behavior levels. Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in captivity increase the performance of behaviors such as surface-looking and spy-hopping in anticipation of training sessions during which food is provided. In this study we measured anticipatory behavior frequency in bottlenose dolphins prior to positive reinforcement training sessions, and assessed whether frequency of anticipatory behavior correlated with their performance on cognitive bias tasks. We found that higher frequencies of anticipatory behavior for training sessions was significantly associated with more pessimistic judgements in cognitive bias tests, supporting previous findings linking higher reward sensitivity with negative affective states. Anticipatory behavior is an easily measured activity and could represent a welfare indicator in dolphins as well as other animals in captive environments.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; anticipatory behavior; bottlenose dolphin; cognitive bias; reward sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385270     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.

Authors:  Sarah Wolfensohn; Justine Shotton; Hannah Bowley; Siân Davies; Sarah Thompson; William S M Justice
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment.

Authors:  Isabella L K Clegg
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Anticipatory behaviour as an indicator of the welfare of dairy calves in different housing environments.

Authors:  Heather W Neave; James R Webster; Gosia Zobel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Helen Kabboush; Jennifer Weller; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Molecular Assessments, Statistical Effectiveness Parameters and Genetic Structure of Captive Populations of Tursiops truncatus Using 15 STRs.

Authors:  Rocío Gómez; Rocío M Neri-Bazán; Araceli Posadas-Mondragon; Pablo A Vizcaíno-Dorado; Jonathan J Magaña; José Leopoldo Aguilar-Faisal
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Effect of age on discrimination learning, reversal learning, and cognitive bias in family dogs.

Authors:  Patrizia Piotti; Dóra Szabó; Zsófia Bognár; Anna Egerer; Petrouchka Hulsbosch; Rachel Sophia Carson; Enikő Kubinyi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Increasing the Awareness of Animal Welfare Science in Marine Mammal Conservation: Addressing Language, Translation and Reception Issues.

Authors:  Isabella L K Clegg; Rebecca M Boys; Karen A Stockin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Affect-Driven Attention Biases as Animal Welfare Indicators: Review and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Gareth Arnott; Emily J Bethell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Assessing and Enhancing the Welfare of Animals with Equivocal and Reliable Cues.

Authors:  Jason V Watters; Bethany L Krebs
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Piglets vocally express the anticipation of pseudo-social contexts in their grunts.

Authors:  A S Villain; A Hazard; M Danglot; C Guérin; A Boissy; C Tallet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.