BACKGROUND: Dietary factors, including sugar-sweetened beverages, may have adverse effects on fertility. Sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with poor semen quality in cross-sectional studies, and female soda intake has been associated with lower fecundability in some studies. METHODS: We evaluated the association of female and male sugar-sweetened beverage intake with fecundability among 3,828 women planning pregnancy and 1,045 of their male partners in a North American prospective cohort study. We followed participants until pregnancy or for up to 12 menstrual cycles. Eligible women were aged 21-45 (male partners ≥21), attempting conception for ≤6 cycles, and not using fertility treatments. Participants completed a comprehensive baseline questionnaire, including questions on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption during the previous 4 weeks. We estimated time-to-pregnancy from follow-up questionnaires completed every 2 months by the female partner. We calculated adjusted fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to intake of sugar- sweetened beverages using proportional probabilities regression. RESULTS: Both female and male intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with reduced fecundability (FR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.70, 0.94 and 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63, 0.95 for ≥7 sugar-sweetened beverages per week compared with none, for females and males, respectively). Fecundability was further reduced among those who drank ≥7 servings per week of sugar-sweetened sodas (FR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.95 for females and 0.67, 95% CI = 0.51, 0.89 for males). CONCLUSIONS: Sugar-sweetened beverages, particularly sodas and energy drinks, were associated with lower fecundability, but diet soda and fruit juice had little association.
BACKGROUND: Dietary factors, including sugar-sweetened beverages, may have adverse effects on fertility. Sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with poor semen quality in cross-sectional studies, and female soda intake has been associated with lower fecundability in some studies. METHODS: We evaluated the association of female and male sugar-sweetened beverage intake with fecundability among 3,828 women planning pregnancy and 1,045 of their male partners in a North American prospective cohort study. We followed participants until pregnancy or for up to 12 menstrual cycles. Eligible women were aged 21-45 (male partners ≥21), attempting conception for ≤6 cycles, and not using fertility treatments. Participants completed a comprehensive baseline questionnaire, including questions on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption during the previous 4 weeks. We estimated time-to-pregnancy from follow-up questionnaires completed every 2 months by the female partner. We calculated adjusted fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to intake of sugar- sweetened beverages using proportional probabilities regression. RESULTS: Both female and male intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages were associated with reduced fecundability (FR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.70, 0.94 and 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63, 0.95 for ≥7 sugar-sweetened beverages per week compared with none, for females and males, respectively). Fecundability was further reduced among those who drank ≥7 servings per week of sugar-sweetened sodas (FR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.95 for females and 0.67, 95% CI = 0.51, 0.89 for males). CONCLUSIONS:Sugar-sweetened beverages, particularly sodas and energy drinks, were associated with lower fecundability, but diet soda and fruit juice had little association.
Authors: Keri Horan Kalmbach; Danielle Mota Fontes Antunes; Roberta Caetano Dracxler; Taylor Warner Knier; Michelle Louise Seth-Smith; Fang Wang; Lin Liu; David Lawrence Keefe Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: T K Jensen; T B Henriksen; N H Hjollund; T Scheike; H Kolstad; A Giwercman; E Ernst; J P Bonde; N E Skakkebaek; J Olsen Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 1998 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Keewan Kim; Karen C Schliep; Elizabeth A DeVilbiss; Stefanie N Hinkle; Aijun Ye; Neil J Perkins; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Robert M Silver; Enrique F Schisterman; Sunni L Mumford Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: S Høyer; A H Riis; G Toft; L A Wise; E E Hatch; A K Wesselink; K J Rothman; H T Sørensen; E M Mikkelsen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Greg J Sommer; Tanran R Wang; Jon G Epperson; Elizabeth E Hatch; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Laura L Fredriksen; Ulrich Y Schaff; Barry Behr; Michael L Eisenberg; Lauren A Wise Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2019-12-15 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Sydney K Willis; Lauren A Wise; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Katherine L Tucker; Ellen Trolle; Elizabeth E Hatch Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jasmin Mahabamunuge; Meg Simione; Benjamin Hong; Chrissy Horan; Sujata G Ayala; Kirsten Davison; Susan Redline; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: F L Nassan; L Priskorn; A Salas-Huetos; T I Halldorsson; T K Jensen; N Jørgensen; J E Chavarro Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 6.353
Authors: E E Hatch; S K Willis; A K Wesselink; E M Mikkelsen; M L Eisenberg; G J Sommer; H T Sorensen; K J Rothman; L A Wise Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Makiko Mitsunami; Albert Salas-Huetos; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jill A Attaman; Jennifer B Ford; Martin Kathrins; Irene Souter; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.357