Literature DB >> 29384721

Risk of Synchronous Distant Recurrence at Time of Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Stage II and III Breast Cancer (AFT-01).

Heather B Neuman1, Jessica R Schumacher1, Amanda B Francescatti1, Taiwo Adesoye1, Stephen B Edge1, David J Vanness1, Menggang Yu1, Daniel McKellar1, David P Winchester1, Caprice C Greenberg1.   

Abstract

Purpose National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend systemic staging imaging at the time of locoregional breast cancer recurrence. Limited data support this recommendation. We determined the rate of synchronous distant recurrence at the time of locoregional recurrence in high-risk patients and identified clinical factors associated with an increased risk of synchronous metastases. Methods A stage-stratified random sample of 11,046 patients with stage II to III breast cancer in 2006 to 2007 was selected from the National Cancer Database for participation in a Commission on Cancer special study. From medical record abstraction of imaging and recurrence data, we identified patients who experienced locoregional recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis. Synchronous distant metastases (within 30 days of locoregional recurrence) were determined. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with synchronous metastases. Results Four percent experienced locoregional recurrence (n = 445). Synchronous distant metastases were identified in 27% (n = 120). Initial presenting stage ( P = .03), locoregional recurrence type ( P = .01), and insurance status ( P = .03) were associated with synchronous distant metastases. The proportion of synchronous metastases was highest for women with lymph node (35%), postmastectomy chest wall (30%), and in-breast (15%) recurrence; 54% received systemic staging imaging within 30 days of a locoregional recurrence. Conclusion These findings support current recommendations for systemic imaging in the setting of locoregional recurrence, particularly for patients with lymph node or chest wall recurrences. Because most patients with isolated locoregional recurrence will be recommended locoregional treatment, early identification of distant metastases through routine systemic imaging may spare them treatments unlikely to extend their survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29384721      PMCID: PMC5877801          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival.

Authors:  M Clemons; S Danson; T Hamilton; P Goss
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials.

Authors:  Irene L Wapnir; Stewart J Anderson; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Charles E Geyer; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Bernard Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognosis following local recurrence in the conservatively treated breast cancer patient.

Authors:  B G Haffty; D Fischer; M Beinfield; C McKhann
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  CT staging of loco-regional breast cancer recurrence. A worthwhile practice?

Authors:  S Tennant; A Evans; D Macmillan; A Lee; E Cornford; J James; I Ellis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Local, regional, and systemic recurrence rates in patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy compared with conventional mastectomy.

Authors:  Min Yi; Steven J Kronowitz; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Barry W Feig; W Fraser Symmans; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Gildy V Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Staging in patients with locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: current practice and prospects for positron emission tomography.

Authors:  F J van Oost; J J M van der Hoeven; O S Hoekstra; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; L V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Prognosis after regional lymph node recurrence in patients with stage I-II breast carcinoma treated with breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  Eleanor E R Harris; Wei-Ting Hwang; Farshad Seyednejad; Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Stewart J Anderson; Irene Wapnir; James J Dignam; Bernard Fisher; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Added value of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in FDG-PET/CT node-negative patients with ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  R Haarsma; A A van Loevezijn; M L Donswijk; A N Scholten; M T F D Vrancken Peeters; F H van Duijnhoven
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Restaging Patients With Locoregional Relapse: Is There Any Benefit? : Commentary on "Radiological Staging for Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients with Confirmed Local and/or Locoregional Recurrence: How Useful are Current Guideline Recommendations?" by Elfgen, Constanze et al.

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  ESR1 mutations are frequent in newly diagnosed metastatic and loco-regional recurrence of endocrine-treated breast cancer and carry worse prognosis.

Authors:  Adi Zundelevich; Maya Dadiani; Smadar Kahana-Edwin; Amit Itay; Tal Sella; Moran Gadot; Karen Cesarkas; Sarit Farage-Barhom; Efrat Glick Saar; Eran Eyal; Nitzan Kol; Anya Pavlovski; Nora Balint-Lahat; Daniela Dick-Necula; Iris Barshack; Bella Kaufman; Einav Nili Gal-Yam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Spatiotemporal Patterns of Loco-Regional Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Fei-Lin Qu; Rui Mao; Zhe-Bin Liu; Cai-Jin Lin; A-Yong Cao; Jiong Wu; Guang-Yu Liu; Ke-Da Yu; Gen-Hong Di; Jun-Jie Li; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prognostic Factors and Surgery for Breast Cancer Patients With Locoregional Recurrence: An Analysis of 5,202 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Jiahui Huang; Yiwei Tong; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.