| Literature DB >> 29384012 |
Shelley Spurr1, Carol Bullin1, Jill Bally1, Krista Trinder2, Shahab Khan3.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of new cases of blindness and is pandemic among Aboriginal people around the world. To reduce health inequities, accessible vision screening among these high-risk populations is essential. To assess cardio-metabolic co-morbidities associated with type 2 diabetes and the use of a portable fundus camera as a novel approach for convenient, earlier and more accessible vision screening for Aboriginal peoples living with type 2 diabetes in northern and remote Canadian communities. This quantitative pilot study screened participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for commonly associated cardio-metabolic co-morbidities using anthropometrical measurements, blood pressure and a A1c (HbA1c) blood glucose test, followed by vision exams conducted first by a trained nurse and then by an ophthalmologist to screen for signs of retinopathy using fundus photography. Large numbers of the participants presented with overweight/obese (84.8%), pre-hypertension/hypertension (69.7%) and an elevated A1C (78.8%). Inter-rater reliability demonstrated substantial agreement between vision exam judgements made by the nurse and ophthalmologist (k = .67). Nurse-led vision screening in remote or northern communities can improve the standard of care by extending access to health services, lowering the costs to families by reducing travel expenses and preventing vision loss in a family member.Entities:
Keywords: Aboriginal; Canadian; nurse-led vision care; retinopathy; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29384012 PMCID: PMC5795657 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2017.1422670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Circumpolar Health ISSN: 1239-9736 Impact factor: 1.228
Demographics.
| Male (N = 17) | Female (N = 16) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | N | % | N | % |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Aboriginal | 11 | 65 | 16 | 100 |
| Non-Aboriginal | 6 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| Age | ||||
| Under 30 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 30–39 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 13 |
| 40–49 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 |
| 50–59 | 6 | 35 | 4 | 25 |
| 60–69 | 6 | 35 | 6 | 38 |
| 70+ | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Years of diabetes | ||||
| <5 | 3 | 18 | 3 | 20 |
| 5–10 | 3 | 18 | 4 | 27 |
| 11–15 | 3 | 18 | 3 | 20 |
| 16–20 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 33 |
| >20 | 5 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
Weight, A1C and blood pressure classification by sex.
| Variable | Male, N = 17 | Female, N = 16 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight classification | N | % | N | % |
| Average weight | 2 | 12 | 3 | 19 |
| Overweight | 6 | 35 | 4 | 25 |
| Obese | 9 | 53 | 9 | 57 |
| A1C classification | ||||
| Normal | 3 | 18 | 4 | 25 |
| Increased | 14 | 82 | 12 | 75 |
| Blood pressure | ||||
| Normal | 5 | 29 | 5 | 31 |
| Pre-hypertension | 5 | 29 | 9 | 56 |
| Hypertension | 7 | 41 | 2 | 13 |
Figure 1.Weight and blood pressure classification for those with elevated A1C by sex.
Figure 2.Diabetic retinapathy.
Retinopathy as assessed by a physician and nurse.
| Yes | No | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rater | N | % | N | % |
| MD | 25 | 83 | 5 | 17 |
| RN | 24 | 80 | 6 | 20 |