| Literature DB >> 29383878 |
Kirsi Kuismanen1,2, Miia Juntunen2, Nathaniel Narra Girish3, Heikki Tuominen4, Heini Huhtala5, Kari Nieminen1, Jari Hyttinen3, Susanna Miettinen2.
Abstract
Anal incontinence is a devastating condition that significantly reduces the quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of human adipose stem cell (hASC) injections in a rat model for anal sphincter injury, which is the main cause of anal incontinence in humans. Furthermore, we tested if the efficacy of hASCs could be improved by combining them with polyacrylamide hydrogel carrier, Bulkamid. Human ASCs derived from a female donor were culture expanded in DMEM/F12 supplemented with human platelet lysate. Female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups (n = 14-15/group): hASCs in saline or Bulkamid (3 × 105 /60 μl) and saline or Bulkamid without cells. Anorectal manometry (ARM) was performed before anal sphincter injury, at two (n = 58) and at four weeks after (n = 33). Additionally, the anal sphincter tissue was examined by micro-computed tomography (μCT) and the histological parameters were compared between the groups. The median resting and peak pressure during spontaneous contraction measured by ARM were significantly higher in hASC treatment groups compared with the control groups without hASCs. There was no statistical difference in functional results between the hASC-carrier groups (saline vs. Bulkamid). No difference was detected in the sphincter muscle continuation between the groups in the histology and μCT analysis. More inflammation was discovered in the group receiving saline with hASC. The hASC injection therapy with both saline and Bulkamid is a promising nonsurgical treatment for acute anal sphincter injury. Traditional histology combined with the 3D μCT image data lends greater confidence in assessing muscle healing and continuity. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:295-304.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose stem cells; Anal incontinence; Anal sphincter injury; Mesenchymal stem cells; Micro-computed tomography; Polyacrylamide hydrogel Bulkamid; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29383878 PMCID: PMC5827744 DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med ISSN: 2157-6564 Impact factor: 6.940
Figure 1Flow chart of the study protocol. *2 rats died presumably due to anesthesia complication. Abbreviations: hASCs, human adipose stem cells; μCT, micro‐computed tomography; NaCl, sodium chloride.
Technical details about the micro‐computed tomography imaging
| Voltage | 60 kV |
| Current | 166 µA |
| Source distance | 58 mm |
| Detector distance | 170 mm |
| Exposure time | 4 seconds |
| Imaging time | 2.5 hours |
| Pixel size | 17.0354 µm |
| Image volume dimensions | 1000 × 1000 × 1000 pixels |
Figure 2Live/dead staining of the human adipose stem cells in Bulkamid; dead cells (red), live cells (green). Scale bar 1.0 mm.
The rat baseline characteristics, functional results from anorectal manometry and histology
| 0.9%NaCl + hASC | Bulkamid+hASC | 0.9%NaCl | Bulkamid | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean/median | SD/ | Mean/median | SD/ | Mean/median | SD/ | Mean/median | SD/ |
| |
| Weight (g) | 268.0/270.0 | 12.1/260.0–280.0 | 263.6/270.0 | 18.6/250.0–280.0 | 275.4/280.0 | 15.7/267.5–290.0 | 285.3/280.0 | 11.4/280.0–300.0 | .002 |
| PreopARM ( | 15 | 14 | 14 | 15 | |||||
| Rest med | 9.1 | 3.4 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 7.8 | 2.4 | 8.2 | 2.3 | .640 |
| Peak contr | 97.5 | 25.2 | 88.5 | 29.6 | 81.3 | 22.1 | 85.0 | 23.3 | .349 |
| ARM 2 wk ( | 15 | 14 | 14 | 15 | |||||
| Rest med | 9.3 | 2.6 | 9.6 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 5.2 | 1.6 | < .000 |
| Peak contr | 74.6 | 16.0 | 74.0 | 13.6 | 44.6 | 20.6 | 47.8 | 14.3 | < .000 |
| ARM 4 wk ( | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | |||||
| Rest med | 10.1 | 3.0 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 6.1 | 3.4 | .005 |
| Peak contr | 79.5 | 16.4 | 76.2 | 21.3 | 52.4 | 27.2 | 46.6 | 26.7 | .014 |
| Inflammation | .003 | ||||||||
| gr 0 (%) | 0.0 | 21.4 | 28.6 | 33.3 | |||||
| gr 1 (%) | 20.0 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 46.7 | |||||
| gr 2 (%) | 40.0 | 42.9 | 21.4 | 20.0 | |||||
| gr 3 (%) | 13.3 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| gr 4 (%) | 26.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
Abbreviations: ARM 2 wk, anorectal manometry at 2‐week time point; ARM 4 wk, anorectal manometry at 4‐week time point; hASC, human adipose stem cells; NaCl, sodium chloride; Peak contr, peak pressure during spontaneous contraction; Preop ARM, preoperative anorectal manometry; Q 1–Q 3, 25 and 75 percentiles; Rest med, median resting anal pressure; Weight, preoperative weight.
Figure 3The trends of the four groups showed a significantly higher contraction pressures in both hASC treatment groups. Abbreviations: hASCs, human adipose stem cells; NaCl, sodium chloride.
Figure 4The histology stainings and examples of the inflammatory grading. (A): Picosirius red‐staining, 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) at 2 weeks; (B): Anti‐Desmin, Bulkamid at 4 weeks; (C): Immunohistochemistry staining CD68, Bulkamid+hASC at 2 weeks; (D): HE‐staining, Bulkamid+hASC at 2 weeks, inflammation grade 1; (E): HE‐staining, Bulkamid+hASC at 4 weeks, inflammation grade 2; (F): HE‐staining, 0.9%NaCl + hASC at 2 weeks, inflammation grade 4; (G): Perls Prussian blue‐staining for iron particles, Bulkamid+hASC at 2 weeks; (H): Combination of CD68 and Perls Prussian blue of the sample G showing that the iron particles localize at the rat endogenous macrophages. Arrow = Bulkamid+hASC‐injection. Scale bar Figures (A–F) 500 μm, Figures (G–H) 20 μm.
Figure 5Comparison of the micro‐computed tomography (A) and histology (B) images. Arrow = injected Bukamid hydrogel.