| Literature DB >> 29383256 |
Madhanlal Udhayarasu1, Kalpana Ramakrishnan1, Soundararajan Periasamy2.
Abstract
Periodical monitoring of renal function, specifically for subjects with history of diabetic or hypertension would prevent them from entering into chronic kidney disease (CKD) condition. The recent increase in numbers may be due to food habits or lack of physical exercise, necessitates a rapid kidney function monitoring system. Presently, it is determined by evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that is mainly dependent on serum creatinine value and demographic parameters and ethnic value. Attempted here is to develop ethnic parameter based on skin texture for every individual. This value when used in GFR computation, the results are much agreeable with GFR obtained through standard modification of diet in renal disease and CKD epidemiology collaboration equations. Once correlation between CKD and skin texture is established, classification tool using artificial neural network is built to categorise CKD level based on demographic values and parameter obtained through skin texture (without using creatinine). This network when tested gives almost at par results with the network that is trained with demographic and creatinine values. The results of this Letter demonstrate the possibility of non-invasively determining kidney function and hence for making a device that would readily assess the kidney function even at home.Entities:
Keywords: CKD epidemiology collaboration equations; South Indian population; artificial neural network; biological organs; chronic kidney disease; diseases; glomerular filtration rate; health care; neural nets; skin; skin texture
Year: 2017 PMID: 29383256 PMCID: PMC5761315 DOI: 10.1049/htl.2016.0098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthc Technol Lett ISSN: 2053-3713
Fig. 2Skin images of normal subjects
a Original image
b Enhanced image
c Directional gradient
Fig. 1Skin images of CKD subjects
a Original image
b Enhanced image
c Directional gradient
Fig. 3Mean of texture values for different random processors
(1 – contrast, 2 – correlation, 3 – energy and 4 – homogeneity)
Mean of random processors
| RP | Level | Mean of process | Deviation from level 1, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| RP1 | level 1 | 0.835 ± 0.012 | — |
| RP2 | level 2 | 0.80 ± 0.019 | 4.19 |
| RP3 | level 3 | 0.6903 ± 0.02 | 17.329 |
| RP4 | level 4 | 0.6058 ± 0.025 | 27.449 |
| RP5 | level 5 | 0.3508 ± 0.034 | 57.98 |
Fig. 4GFR obtained through MDRD, CKD-EPI, proposed method for a sample of data
Fig. 5Architecture of neural network used for classification
Classification accuracy as obtained through the two networks constructed
| Classification result | Network 1, % | Network 2, % |
|---|---|---|
| false positive | 0 | 3.33 |
| false negative | 3.33 | 3.33 |
| true positive | 80 | 76.66 |
| true negative | 16.6 | 16.66 |
Fig. 6Distribution of P-value with age and CKD level
Fig. 7Skin texture as ensemble of RPs