Literature DB >> 29382615

Pain-Free Outcomes and Durability of Surgical Intervention for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparison of Gamma Knife and Microvascular Decompression.

Zachary S Mendelson1, Jayant R Velagala1, Gurkirat Kohli1, Gary M Heir2, Antonios Mammis1, James K Liu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for trigeminal neuralgia include microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife surgery (GKS). There is no consensus which option is more effective at providing immediate and long-lasting pain relief. This study evaluated the differences between these 2 options in terms of rates of complete pain relief and pain-free recurrence.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of published studies of MVD and GKS for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia from 2004 to 2014. Studies were selected using a MEDLINE/PubMed search and from subsequent inspection of references from articles found in the initial search. Common outcome measures reported in the studies were used for meta-analysis to make conclusions based on current available data.
RESULTS: The MVD group included 18 articles with 2650 patients, and the GKS group included 25 articles with 2846 patients. MVD was found to have a significantly higher rate of initial pain-free outcomes (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I) compared with GKS (92.22% vs. 61.46%, P < 0.0001). MVD was also found to have a significantly higher rate of long-term pain-free outcomes at last follow-up compared with GKS (79.37% vs. 41.62%, P < 0.0001). MVD was found to have a similar rate of pain-free recurrence compared with GKS (14.93% vs. 19.38%, P = 0.2536).
CONCLUSIONS: MVD may be a more effective intervention than GKS owing to higher rates of initial pain-free outcomes and long-term pain-free outcomes. There is a need for more consistent data reporting of outcomes for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma Knife surgery; Meta-analysis; Microvascular decompression; Pain; Systematic review; Trigeminal neuralgia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29382615     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

1.  Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Nerve Compression Syndromes in the Posterior Cranial Fossa.

Authors:  Jörg Baldauf; Christian Rosenstengel; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: Understanding Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management Through Clinical Vignettes.

Authors:  Michael K Racke; Elliot M Frohman; Teresa Frohman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia : Review and Update.

Authors:  Seunghoon Lee; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia with "Microvascular Decompression Plus" Technique.

Authors:  Ming-Xing Liu; Jun Zhong; Lei Xia; Ning-Ning Dou; Juanhong Shi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-05-19

Review 6.  Chronic Facial Pain: Trigeminal Neuralgia, Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain, and Myofascial Pain Syndrome-An Evidence-Based Narrative Review and Etiological Hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert Gerwin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.