Ernest Chan1, Shawna L Boyle1, Jeffrey Campbell1, Patrick P W Luke1. 1. Western University, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry and Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The relative impact of preoperative and perioperative variables on renal function following partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. To further investigate, we assess the effects of tumour complexity, warm ischemic time (WIT), and volume of resected renal parenchyma on ipsilateral renal function (IRF) outcomes following minimally invasive PN. METHODS: Of patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted PN between 2002 and 2011 at our institution, 99 met our inclusion criteria. The effects of preoperative tumour complexity (using RENAL nephrometry score), perioperative WIT, and pathological tumour volumes on ipsilateral renal function preservation (%IRF) were analyzed. %IRF was defined as the proportion of postoperative to preoperative ipsilateral renal function calculated using MAG3 nuclear renography. RESULTS: Increasing RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) and WIT were independently predictive of inferior %IRF at 6-12-week postoperative followup in univariate and multivariate analyses. Of RNS properties, masses that were endophytic, near the collecting system, or central in location were associated with inferior %IRF, with nearness to collecting system as the strongest predictor; however, RNS was no longer predictive of %IRF in cases requiring more than 30 minutes of WIT. CONCLUSIONS: In renal masses amenable to resection by minimally invasive PN, longer WIT was the most important predictor of inferior %IRF. Although increasing RNS score influenced %IRF, the overall clinical significance of RNS is limited and should not influence operative decision-making in efforts to preserve renal function. Furthermore, small volumes of renal parenchyma can be safely resected without impairment of long-term IRF.
INTRODUCTION: The relative impact of preoperative and perioperative variables on renal function following partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. To further investigate, we assess the effects of tumour complexity, warm ischemic time (WIT), and volume of resected renal parenchyma on ipsilateral renal function (IRF) outcomes following minimally invasive PN. METHODS: Of patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted PN between 2002 and 2011 at our institution, 99 met our inclusion criteria. The effects of preoperative tumour complexity (using RENAL nephrometry score), perioperative WIT, and pathological tumour volumes on ipsilateral renal function preservation (%IRF) were analyzed. %IRF was defined as the proportion of postoperative to preoperative ipsilateral renal function calculated using MAG3 nuclear renography. RESULTS: Increasing RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) and WIT were independently predictive of inferior %IRF at 6-12-week postoperative followup in univariate and multivariate analyses. Of RNS properties, masses that were endophytic, near the collecting system, or central in location were associated with inferior %IRF, with nearness to collecting system as the strongest predictor; however, RNS was no longer predictive of %IRF in cases requiring more than 30 minutes of WIT. CONCLUSIONS: In renal masses amenable to resection by minimally invasive PN, longer WIT was the most important predictor of inferior %IRF. Although increasing RNS score influenced %IRF, the overall clinical significance of RNS is limited and should not influence operative decision-making in efforts to preserve renal function. Furthermore, small volumes of renal parenchyma can be safely resected without impairment of long-term IRF.
Authors: Giuseppe Simone; Inderbir S Gill; Alexandre Mottrie; Alexander Kutikov; Jean-Jacques Patard; Antonio Alcaraz; Craig G Rogers Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Eugene K Cha; Casey K Ng; Bryan Jeun; Allison Dunning; Jennifer E Reifsnyder; James R DiPietro; Madhu Mazumdar; George Shih; Yong H Auh; Joseph J Del Pizzo; Shahrokh F Shariat; Douglas S Scherr Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-05-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Maria C Mir; Rebecca A Campbell; Nidhi Sharma; Erick M Remer; Matt N Simmons; Jianbo Li; Sevag Demirjian; Jihad Kaouk; Steven C Campbell Journal: Urology Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: A Ari Hakimi; Reza Ghavamian; Steven K Williams; Philip H Kim; Ling Chen; John P Sfakianos; Gal E Keren-Paz; Alexander Sankin; Natasha Ginzburg; Jonathan A Coleman Journal: J Endourol Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Thu Tran; Chandru P Sundaram; Clinton D Bahler; John N Eble; David J Grignon; M Francesca Monn; Novae B Simper; Liang Cheng Journal: J Cancer Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Shahid Aquil; Daniel Olvera-Posada; Roshan Navaratnam; David Mikhail; Max A Levine; Patrick P Luke; Alp Sener Journal: Curr Urol Date: 2020-03-20