Literature DB >> 29382126

Erratum: Mei, Y., et al. Mechanics Based Tomography: A Preliminary Feasibility Study. Sensors 2017, 17, 1075.

Yue Mei1, Sicheng Wang2, Xin Shen3, Stephen Rabke4, Sevan Goenezen5.   

Abstract

The authors wish to correct Figures 12 and 14 in their paper published in Sensors [1], doi:10.3390/s17051075, http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/5/1075[...].

Year:  2018        PMID: 29382126      PMCID: PMC5855962          DOI: 10.3390/s18020384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


The authors wish to correct Figure 12 and Figure 14 in their paper published in Sensors [1], doi:10.3390/s17051075, http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/5/1075.
Figure 12

Shear modulus reconstructions with 0.1% noise. (a) Target shear modulus distribution with an elliptically shaped inclusion is defined to study detectability of the inclusion shape. (b,c) Reconstructed shear modulus distribution using 5 and 10 boundary displacement data sets, respectively (unit in the scale bar: kPa). Note: “SM” stands for shear modulus.

Figure 14

Problem domain with target shear modulus distribution is defined in the first column with varying shear modulus values in the inclusion from 7.5 (top row) to 100 kPa (bottom row) to test the feasibility range of stiffness detection. Columns 2 and 3 represent the shear modulus reconstructions with 5 and 10 boundary displacement data sets, respectively, using 0.1% noise.

The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers by these changes. The manuscript will be updated, and the original will remain online on the article webpage with a reference to this Erratum.
  1 in total

1.  Mechanics Based Tomography: A Preliminary Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Yue Mei; Sicheng Wang; Xin Shen; Stephen Rabke; Sevan Goenezen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.