| Literature DB >> 29382054 |
Kristián Máthis1, Klaudia Horváth2,3, Gergely Farkas4,5, Heeman Choe6, Kwang Seon Shin7, Alexei Vinogradov8,9.
Abstract
Twin roll casting (TRC), with a relatively fast solidification rate, is an excellent production method with promising potential for producing wrought semi or final Mg alloy products that can often suffer from poor formability. We investigate in this study the effect of the TRC method and the subsequent heat treatment on the microstructure and deformation mechanisms in Mg-Zn-Zr-Nd alloy deformed at room temperature using the in-situ neutron diffraction and acoustic emission techniques and ex-situ texture measurement and microscopy, respectively. Although a higher work hardening is observed in the rolling direction due to the more intensive <a>-type dislocation activity, the difference in the mechanical properties of the specimens deformed in the RD and TD directions is small in the as-rolled condition. An additional heat treatment results in recrystallization and significant anisotropy in the deformation. Due to the easier activation of the extension twinning in the TD given by texture, the yield stress in the TD is approximately 40% lower than that in the RD.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic emission; magnesium; neutron diffraction; twin roll casting; twinning; yield strength
Year: 2018 PMID: 29382054 PMCID: PMC5848897 DOI: 10.3390/ma11020200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Optical micrographs of the longitudinal surface of: (a) as-rolled; and (c) heat-treated specimens; and micrographs of the cross-section of: (b) as-rolled; and (d) heat-treated specimens. The draw indicates the particular directions and sections, from which the micrographs were acquired. The red circles in Figure 1c indicate the fine grain areas, whereas the black circles the coarse grains.
Figure 2Orientation image maps (OIM) of the as-rolled: (a) surface (600 × 1300 µm)—the white arrows indicate the fine-grained strips; (b) cross-section (600 × 1300 µm); and (c) the corresponding Kernel Average Misorientation map (KAM) for the surface; (d) OIM map of the surface of the heat-treated specimen (550 × 1400 µm). On the corresponding image quality map, the extension twin boundaries (marked in red color) and the grains size distribution are indicated; (e) KAM map for the surface of the heat-treated specimen. The KAMs were calculated as the average misorientation between the data point and all of its first neighbors while excluding misorientations higher than 5°.
Figure 3Evolution of and pole figures for: (a) as-rolled; and (b) heat treated specimens as a function of the sample orientation with respect to the loading direction (measured by X-ray diffraction).
Figure 4Stress–strain curves and dependences of the lattice strains and integral intensities of particular diffraction peaks in an axial and radial detector on the applied stress for as-rolled specimens tensioned in: (a) RD; and (b) TD directions; and heat treated (T4) specimens tensioned in: (c) RD; and (d) TD directions. The dash lines indicate the yield stress for the particular specimens.
Figure 5Acoustic emission response during tensile tests of the specimens in as-rolled condition along: (a) RD; and (b) TD directions; and after heat treatment along: (c) RD; and (d) TD directions.
Figure 6OIM maps of the longitudinal direction of the as-rolled specimens deformed in: (a) RD (550 × 1100 µm); and (b) TD directions (550 × 1100 µm).
Figure 7OIM maps of the surface of the heat-treated specimens, deformed in: (a) RD (550 × 1100 µm); and (b) TD directions (550 × 1100 µm). On the corresponding image quality maps, the extension twin boundaries are indicated in red color.